During the 20th century, Russia was experiencing turmoil in war and the country was deeply affected with Tsar Nicholas’s wrong decisions and lack of experience in politics. After the 1917 revolution in Russia, Lenin became the ruler of Russia and the USSR and proved to be the best Russian ruler of the 20th century. Before then, Tsarism dominated and Nicholas II was in power until he foresaw many revolutions against his methods of ruling. He remained as the supreme ruler and did not take actions for reforms. However, after the 1917 revolution, which Lenin masterminded, the Tsar was overthrown and the Bolsheviks established a stable government which took control in Russia. 20th Century Russia had a massive transformation from being an Autocracy …show more content…
As a matter of fact, Lenin was able to perceive the massive defeat and the consequences they would have to pay later on, so he brought it to a stop with the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. Unlike the Tsar who just ordered army troops to the battlefront, not caring if the army troops died, Lenin waged both choices: lose support from France and Britain or watch Russia get overrun by another power. This lead to Lenin knowing it was over for Russia and started having peace talks with Germany at Brest-Litovsk, a German border. Lenin had to get a plan ready because the German army were entering Russia at 100 miles every 4 days, so he sent Leon Trotsky, Russia’s Commissar, near the German border to sign the Brest-Litovsk Treaty. He dragged out talks for as long as he could hoping that the 2 countries would make a fair deal, but this didn’t happen. This treaty was one of the important treaties signed in Russian history, as it would mean that the war between Russia and Germany would come to a stop. Germany decided to turn down taking over the country, hence leading Lenin to pay a high price. Germany had high demands from Russia. Nonetheless, Lenin knew he had to save Russia from mass murders he decided to sign the treaty at any cost. Russia gave away 74% of iron ore and coal, 26% of railways, 27% of farmland, and 26% of the …show more content…
Nicholas II was not the one fully to blame for his lack of experience and bad judgement. His father, Alexander III, thought his son was too immature to train for becoming a leader. Here is a quote by Alexander III being recited: “Nicholas is young and strong although he is too immature to handle the rigorous training needed to become the next ruler.” Due to no training being applied to Nicholas, he rose to power after taking over his father’s power in 1894 as a very inexperienced ruler. He also did not make a good impression on the people of Russia as his wife, Princess Alix of Hesse was German, and she was not accepted amongst the Russian people. Furthermore, Nicholas allowed his country to enter two wars, the Russo-Japanese war and WWI, Russia being ill-prepared for the wars both times. The battles did not go well in either of the wars and his actions dealt great suffering to the people of Russia, especially the minority, or lower class. Although his country was in peril and he knew it, he refused to implement reforms. Tsar Nicholas II truly wanted to aid his country although his inexperience did not allow him to do so. Hence, this led to the murder of his family and the end of 3 centuries of Romanov ruling when the Bolsheviks took power of Russia. Unlike Lenin, Tsar Nicholas II did not have any experience in any of the governmental fields thus making him
Following the death of Vladimir Lenin in 1914, Joseph Stalin took up his position as leader of the Soviet Union. After rising to power, Stalin made drastic changes to Russia that was still torn from war at the time. With his power, Stalin aimed to bring Russia to the top of the world. In the end, while he pushed the Soviet Union’s economy to new heights, his methods were cruel and had negative impacts. After the war, Stalin was determined to turn Russia into a great industrial power.
Similar to the Tsars before him, Stalin caused the death of anyone who opposed his way of ruling, especially the Kulaks. He violated the rights of the people by launching an extensive campaign on deporting ethnic groups that opposed his leadership. Stalin’s years of “great terror” through much unneeded purges caused him to more and more act as a “Red Tsar”. The only difference was Stalin was ruling under Marxist ideologies with communism being the end result as opposed to adherence to the Russian Orthodox Church. However, just like Stalin, Alexander II was very similar in that the secret police was at the centre of dealing with outside issues towards his power.
Peter the Great came barreling through Russia as tsar from 1721 to 1725, bringing with him a slew of economic, social, and political reforms that are argued to have made Russia a great nation once again. Prior to his reign, Russia had endured many difficulties, from Ivan the Terrible’s chaotic reign to the great Raskol to the time of troubles. Peter the Great is credited with prompting Russia to rise once again as a great nation through great institutional reforms, particularly surrounding military-based industrialization. Despite how highly regarded Peter the Great is in Russian society, historians like Marc Raeff argue that Peter the Great’s reign “was to tear Russian society apart, leaving behind a legacy of uncertainty and insecurity that
Throughout Russia’s history, there have been many rulers that tried to manage their country in different ways. Even though, all of these rulers had their own unique ways of ruling, all of them were seen as terrible by the people. This eventually led to a tipping point for the Russian citizens and the Russian Revolution took place. The goal for these people was to gain freedom from their oppressive czar but instead, they got an even worse leader. Joseph Stalin was a leader of the Soviet Union from 1929 to 1953 and he was known for his ability to strike fear into people.
Post WWl, Russia was still not industrialized, suffering economically and politically and in no doubt in need of a leader after Lenin’s death. “His successor, Joseph Stalin, a ruthless dictator, seized power and turned Russia into a totalitarian state where the government controls all aspects of private and public life.” Stalin showed these traits by using methods of enforcement, state control of individuals and state control of society. The journey of Stalin begins now.
A revolution was sparked, and led to the abdication of Nicholas II. When he abdicated, meaning he renounced the throne, he hoped his brother would rule until Alexei, Nicholas II’s son, would be old enough to take over. When Nicholas II’s brother refused to take the throne, the power was turned over to the Provisional Government. The government soon became chaos, with people splitting into different sides. The Bolsheviks, a group led by Vladimir Lenin and Alexander Bogdanov, rose to power.
The Russians Fight Back Three outcome and causes of the Russian revolution were the large amount of peasant population, Russia joined the war when they knew that they couldn’t even pull their own weight, and communism took over Russia. The tsar joined the war thinking that he would gain nationalism and patriotism from the peasants.(doc.1).He thought that all the people would rush to sign up to fight for their country and support the tsar. The first months after joining the war were disastrous. The tsar had to steal from his people to give to the troops who had very little supplies.
In 1917, Tsar Nicholas ll is the current ruler of Russia. Russia’s economic growth is increased by the Czar’s reforms of the production of factories. During this era, Russia desperately needed to keep up with the rest of Europe’s industry. This reform worked perfectly, but the working conditions of these factories didn’t charm factory workers. After the events of the Russo-Japanese War, “Bloody Sunday”, and WW1, Russia was in utter chaos under the Czar’s ghastly leadership.
When the time came, and Lenin felt that it is suitable to take action, it can be argued that he did not look at Marx for answers, but due to his practical nature, preferred looking at the state that Russia was in, and based his actions on that. This was because Lenin felt that the world had changed since Marx’s time, primarily due to the development of
The Treaty of Brest - Litovsk resulted in quite a lot of land being lost to Germany, however Russia gained most of this land back once World War I ended due to the Treaty of Versailles. During the Russian Civil War, the produce of the crops were taken from the Russian people, but the land itself remained with its owners. After the Russian Civil War ended, people were free to buy and sell land. Lenin never permanently took land from the Russian people, and eventually allowed them to buy and sell their land, meaning that Lenin stuck to his original ideal of giving his people
However, his inability to compromise led to to dissolve the constitute assembly and consequently Lenin secure the Bolshevik party but arguably triggered the start of the civil war. His self confidence meant opposition to the Bolsheviks was destroyed and ultimately
Germany was to take from anything from this newly acquired territory what she felt was needed to fight the war at hand. This treaty may have cost the Russians a lot, but it gave Vladimir Lenin what he needed. What he needed was time, time which was spent on solidifying Russia. Vladimir Lenin also needed to introduce an economic system that was with his beliefs and one that would benefit those under Bolsheviks rule. This economic policy was to be called War Communism.
Furthermore, they wanted to start revolution against decisions made by their tragic excuse of a czar, Nicholas II. These transactions proposed as the idea of a revolution gained followers and grew greatly in hopes to create change. These transactions were right because they opposed what the people needed, which was equal treatment and protection for not only people of higher authority, but yet for everyone. Once Lenin gained control of Russia as new czar, great changes were created. As proposed, Lenin followed through with his wanted changes and made them present in Russian society.
“Is what you want? A miserable little bourgeois republic? In the name of the great Soviet republic of labour we declare war to the death on such a government!” (Bukharin, 1917) . The Russians were fed up of being poorly treated by their own country, so they decided to take a stance.
There are many different views and perceptions on leadership and what it exactly means. This is because there are many different types of leaders and many different views on them. But the basic meaning of leadership is an individual who can select the right group of followers and influence them through their distinct gifts, abilities, skills and knowledge. A leader focuses on the follower and puts out a roadmap to the overall mission and vision; hereby the follower is influenced to willingly and enthusiastically in achieving the mission and vision. The leader achieves this influence by humbly delivering a visionary perception of the future in clear terms that resonates with the follower in terms of their believes and values.