Case #1: 1977 Murder of James Anagnos Victims: James Anagnos Suspects: Frank Wright How hair played a role in solving the case: The hair of Frank Wright was found clenched in the victim, James Anagnos, hand due to an earlier conflict between the two. Case #2: The murder of Elizabeth Ballard Victims: Elizabeth Ballard Suspects: Two unnamed men How hair played a role in solving the case: Follicles of both victims dogs were found at the initial place of the murder, directly linking them to the death. Case #3: The Disappearance of Melissa Brannen Victims: Melissa Brannen Suspects: Caleb Hughes How fibers played a role in solving the case: The fibers found in the backseat of Hughes car were similar to those on the outfit
Crime scene investigators noted signs of a struggle left under Estelle’s nails. After it was already too late, DNA testing determined the skin found under her fingernails was not a match to Blair but rather a match to the other suspect at the time of the original investigation. The expert DNA testimony at Blair’s trial consisted of fibers and hair found in his vehicle, on his person, and at an unrelated park was circumstantial and eventually disproven by DNA
Case 1- Name of case-1977 Murder of Rubidox Victim-James Anagnos Suspects-Frank Wright How the hair and fiber made a connection to the case. Anagnos was stabbed twenty times and hit in the head. Case
In the forensic investigation, there were 6 pieces of forensic finding used in Timothy McVeigh trial. The first set of the finding was the earplugs that he wore to silent the noise of the explosive. Meanwhile, there was a trace of residue found in his jean pockets along with two t-shirts and a knife with the sheath. Therefore, due to the positive mixture founded on McVeigh, the prosecutor believe that McVeigh was involved in making a bomb from a mixture of ammonium nitrate and fuel oil. It was believed after, Timothy McVeigh also participated in placing the barrel of bomb ingredients in the back of the rental Ryder truck.
In September of 1961, a woman from District of Columbia had an intruder break into her apartment. While the invader of the home was there, they had taken her wallet, and also raped the woman. During the investigation of the crime, the police had found some latent fingerprints in the apartment. The police then established and processed the prints. The prints were then connected back to 16 year old Morris A. Kent.
Wayne Williams was found guilty of the killing of two people. Even years after William’s still tries to persuade the idea of him being innocent. Just like fingerprints, hair analysis is following the same path. I think that DNA fingerprints will become bigger and more accurate of accusing killers, the use of hair analysis will decrease, but I do not think hair analysis should be taken away.
There was no blood. And so there was no way to conduct a conclusive DNA test. But there was that strand of hair. At a key stage in the 1992 rape and burglary trial.
The perpetrator left a fingerprint on the doorknob of one of the victim’s bedroom doors and a herringbone pattern tennis shoe print in one of the victim’s front yard near the front door. The police questioned about thirty to forty men in the area and focused on one main suspect, Hayes. The police went to Hayes home and requested a fingerprint, and Hayes
While they were waiting for the advances, they thoroughly checked the crime scenes to find incriminating evidence against him. “In addition to the traditional tasks of compiling a paper trail on suspects, detectives went to extraordinary lengths searching for any trace physical evidence. They collected birds’ nests and animal feces, searched on hands and knees with magnifying glasses and tweezers. They knew that the entire case might hinge on a microscopic fragment that could be easily overlooked” (Murderpedia, the encyclopedia
The fiber evidence presented in this case was so overwhelming and simply was the driving force leading to Wayne Williams conviction. I do not believe the prosecution would have been able to obtain the same results without it. The credibility of the FBI forensics investigators and their reputable crime lab made for excellent testimony concerning the fiber evidence at trail, which the defense was simply ill prepared to counter attack its merits (The Atlanta, n.d.). Other evidence was presented in this case, and much of this evidence while certainly impactful on the case and to members of the jury, this evidence alone without the fiber evidence would surely not have held up to the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.
Case: George Perrot Victim:78-year-old woman who lived in Springfield Suspects: George Perrot George Perrot spent almost 30 years in prison thanks to a single hair. It was discovered by an FBI agent on the bedsheet of a 78 year old woman who had been raped by a burglar in her home in Springfield, Massachusetts, in 1985. George Perrot was put on trial because of the hair, there was no physical evidence of semen and no blood, so the hair was the only way of tying him to this case. The FBI agent Wayne Oakes is an expert in hair and textile fibers. The FBI agent referred to the medulla, the cortex and the cuticle of hair to help with identifying the hair to George Perrot.
Name of the case: Case of James Anagnos Victim: James Anagnos Suspects:Frank wright Link between the hair and case: After being stabbed twenty times, and being hit in the head four times, the victim Mr. Anagnos was found dead with hair in his hand, thought to be from the suspect. In 2010 the hair sample was sent to a private lab in Texas to be examined, and this led to the hair being identified as the hair of Frank wright who was the murderer. Case Name: Case of John Joubert Victims: Danny Joe Eberle Suspects: John Joubert Hair Link: The fibers of the rope used to bind the victim was a rare type of rope and one that the suspect had, as well as hair from the boy that was bound in rope in his car. Name of the case: Evonitz Vs.
Name of the Case - James Anagnos 1977 Cold Case murder Victim- James Anagnos Suspects- Frank Wright How the hair of fiber made a connection for the case (what the analysis told them) In the October of 1977, James Anagnos was brutally murdered in his own bar.
The primary types of forensic evidence found at Ramírez’s crime scenes were fingerprints and bodily fluids. Unfortunately, DNA profiling for use in the criminal justice field was still very new in the mid-1980s (Waring) so bodily fluids found at the crime scenes were not as helpful as they would be today. However, Ramírez’s fingerprints proved to be very effective when presented to the jury as evidence and have largely been credited as key to his conviction
Forensic and Behavioral evidence pointed convincingly to Wayne Williams as the murderer of eleven young men in Atlanta. In 2010, a DNA test was conducted on the scalp hairs found on a body dumped down a wooded slope behind an office park on February 13, 1981. It was of 11-year-old Patrick Baltazar. Inside the boy's shirt, two human scalp hairs were discovered. Although the results were not conclusive, the FBI's DNA laboratory listed the odds of 130-to-1 against the hairs coming from any person other than Wayne Williams.
There was multiply evidence that, traced back to O.J. Simpson. His blood was recovered and fingerprints were local on the back fence. Later they found his hair in a knit hat at the crime scene, which the same kind of fiber was found on Goldman’s clothing. Fibers from simpson’s car were also similar to the knit hat. In his vehicle, he had blood from both victims and a pair of bloody socks in his house, along with the right glove that was missing from the crime scene.