This week I read the Federalist No. 1 [Alexander Hamilton]. The purpose of the Federalist is to persuade reluctant New Yorkers to adopt the proposed new Constitution. In the Federalist No. 1, Hamilton mainly reveals the motivations and ambitions of a certain class of men who support separate confederacies and introduces the following papers he proposes to defend the Union. Since the Federalist is such popular collection of America, I start this week reading with great curiosity and passion. However, Hamilton’s No. 1 really chills me out, because the complexed sentences’ structures and the vocabulary part is uncommon to me. Although it takes me much time to understand Hamilton’s basic opinions, it is worthy of reading this text and I find that
In 1787 the future of the United States of America remained unclear as the founding fathers attempted to find a form of government to satisfy the nation. At the Constitutional Convention the men gathered formed an idea for a new government. However, not everyone present agreed with the newly proposed constitution and two groups formed, the federalists, who were pro-constitution, and the antifederalists, who opposed the constitution. Because the Constitution needed to be ratified by nine of the thirteen states to become law the two groups wrote essays to defend their stance and persuade the people to join their ideology. Hamilton used a relatable rhetoric with simple language that involved the readers in a personal relationship to persuade them
Student’s name Professor’s name Course number Date The Virginia and New Jersey plans 1 The Virginia plan had various characteristics as proposed by Mr Randolph. He suggested in accordance to the wishes of the committee that the national government should be created and that it should consist of a supreme legislative, Executive and Judiciary. According to Mr. Patterson in the Virginia plan which he drew from Mr. Randolph’s propositions, proposed that revision of the articles of confederations was paramount in order to render federal constitution adequacy to the demands of both government and the union in preservation.
Federalist Paper 69, written by Alexander Hamilton in 1788, addresses the topic of the presidency. Its purpose was to illustrate to the people of New York what the real character of the executive would be. The subject matter and time period of this essay allow for speculation that the people of that time were concerned that ratifying a constitution with a president at the head of government would have been willingly putting themselves beneath a tyrannical ruler, after having recently gained independence from tyrannical King George III. Throughout this essay, Hamilton adamantly stressed the fact that the president would not be likened unto the king of Great Britain, but rather unto the governor of New York. The president would be an elected
Federalist No. 1 Analysis Alexander Hamilton was one of the Founding Fathers of the United States. He was born on January 11th of 1755 or 1757 in Charlestown, Nevis and died July 12th, 1804. Hamilton is best known for his interpretations of the Constitution resulting in the Federalist Papers. He wrote this piece in order to address the conflicting views for the newly introduced Constitution; being the Federalists and anti-Federalists. This piece was written in 1788, after the Constitution was released, George Washington was elected as the first president and John Adams as vice president Hamilton is trying to convince readers that Federalists, those in favor of the states being united under one overarching government, were in the right and
(1).” This group did not the Constitution did not properly state the rights and powers of the three branches of government, states’ rights, etc. In order to please the Anti-federalists, the Preamble was put into place to allow American citizens know the central government’s rights, and states’ rights. Lecture 15 “Questions to Consider #1”: In what ways does the modern American economy resemble the plan set out in Hamilton’s three great reports?
The 9th Federalist Paper emphasizes Alexander Hamilton 's thoughts in which he states that the way the form of union was being presented by the proposed constitution was not the ideal form of union for America. He says that they need a firm union to prevent domestic faction and insurrection from happening. Hamilton includes five "improvements" in which he says that they were "either not known at all, or imperfectly understood by the ancients". These improvements include a legislative checks and balances, a separation of powers, an independent judiciary, scheme of representation, and the "enlargement of the orbit". He believed that He concludes with the fact that the use of a Confederacy is not anything new, but that it has been used in other countries
Why doesn’t our country suck; Federalism. The Federalist Party began in 1788. There was a major argument between two groups of people that provided a strong government and later led to what we know as the United States to form and become the united country as a whole. Alexander Hamilton was the leader in this large scheme. This party was a debate against the anti-federalists to form a government that made the states and the country stronger.
After a fiercely fought revolution, the newly independent American nation struggled to establish a concrete government amidst an influx of opposing ideologies. Loosely tied together by the Articles of Confederation, the thirteen sovereign states were far from united. As growing schisms in American society became apparent, an array of esteemed, prominent American men united in 1787 to form the basis of the United States government: the Constitution. Among the most eminent members of this convention were Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr, James Madison, and Thomas Jefferson. These men, held to an almost godly stature, defined the future of the nation; but were their intentions as honest as they seemed?
In Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton lays out his vision for how the Supreme Court of the United States should function. In it, he assures that one of the key roles of the Supreme Court will be to check the constitutionality of congressional legislation in order to protect the individual rights of the people. However, in his opinion for the Marbury v. Madison case in 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall interprets the power of judicial review from Article III of the constitution, in a way in which the court becomes a powerful branch of government. With Marshall’s interpretation, the court is able to “strike down” legislation by the command of the people which is embedded in the Constitution (O’Brien 173). Hamilton intended for the court to
He was born in january 22,1782 in albany new york. He was in the u.s. Secretary. From the time he is dressed in the morning till nine o'clock the time for breakfast excepted he is to read law. Certain evenings and weekend afternoons were apparently the only time the young man had to himself. And it was on the Friday evening of November 20, 1801 that Philip Hamilton's tragedy began.
Alexander Hamilton Alexander Hamilton was born on Nevis a small island in the British West Indies to Rachael Faucette originally of St. Croix a half British, half French Huguenot who was married to Johann Michael Lavien a Danish plantation owner and a man in his 30’s who Faucettes mother had married her off to in her teens. Lavien had made terrible financial decisions, frequently beat her and they experienced unending misfortunes. Faucette had no love for her husband and was actually thrown into prison for adultery and called a whore after a fight with Lavien. Once released from prison she left her young son and husband and escaped the marriage to St. Kitts with her mother.
Antoni Saade Mrs. Deborah Sprenger Dual United States and Virginia History 12 October 2014 Alexander Hamilton: Politician, Lawyer, Soldier Few figures in American history have influenced the United States in as many aspects as Alexander Hamilton. Born in the British West Indies in 1755, Hamilton came to the colonies as a teenage boy and quickly embarked on a momentous career. He came to be a notable member of the Continental Congress, an author of the Federalist Papers, a champion of the Constitution, and the first secretary of the Treasury, where he helped found the first national bank, the U.S. Mint, and a tax collection bureau that would later become the U.S. Coast Guard.
Numerous thoughts were proposed amid the drafting of the constitution however maybe none as vital as that of balanced governance. This thought is exemplified in James Madison's The Federalist. He additionally does this by demonstrating that the legislature must have fundamental measures to control itself. Both of the thoughts he bolsters in his paper show that he was an extraordinary supporter of the endorsement of
Good day, gentlemen, We are gathered here today to discuss the Articles of Confederation and issues pertaining our federal government. I, Alexander Hamilton, come from the state of New York. Before the revolution, I planned to attend the King’s College in New York but was not capable of finishing my studies as the Revolution prevented me from doing so. During the progress of the war, I had been promoted to the rank Lieutenant Colonel and worked alongside General Washington as aide-de-camp and his personal secretary. After my time in service, I pursued a career in law, but eventually, I decided that I wanted to work for the public.
Following the ratification of the United States’ Constitution, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison compiled a list of letters to provide more information to the American public. These letters, also known as the Federalist Papers, detail the specifics regarding branches of government, status of citizenship, and the democratic role of the people. Federalist Paper No. 67, titled the Executive Department and written by Alexander Hamilton, focuses on the powers of the executive branch and calms the fears of the doubtful citizens. In addition, it provides information on the executive branch’s responsibilities and ways to increase the overall effectiveness of running an admirable government for the newly-independent United States of America.