Disparities in development, power, and technology highlight the role of success and dominance that shape the course of history. The theme of the book seeks to understand the significant disparities and prompts exploration of factors, geographical, environmental, and historical circumstances that led to the unequal distribution of power. Lack of resources, inborn differences, social distinction, and the limited opportunities many indigenous people had were among the many challenges they faced. Diamond's narration is factual while both explaining the context and events that shape the course of history. The tone is neutral while still emphasizing each aspect of causation and effect when explaining native societies and European motives. Diamond …show more content…
This way of writing immerses the reader in the event from the ones who had the motive to concur and can better historians' understanding of causation. Diamond shares a primary account from Pizarro. He was inconsiderate of the locals when traveling through a foreign region. With more than 80,000 indigenous soldiers, Atahuallpa was the largest and most advanced state in the New World, while Pizarro only had 168 soldiers. Pizarro shares the fear the Spaniards felt after seeing the beauty in Atahuallpa, but they continued their plan to attack without showing fear and used their advantage of guns to eliminate most of the population. European societies, like Spain, made technological advancements and started to improve long-distance travel, which resulted in a broadening of influence. Diamond explains these aspects that led to conquest and victory for the Spanish - guns, germs and steel. The difference between Eurasian and societies in the Americas, Africa, and Australia regions is that these places lacked suitable domesticated species, faced many geological barriers, and remained isolated to their lifestyle never significantly expanding nomadically or regionally. This made them more vulnerable to diseases. Diseases was the biggest factor that wiped out the indigenous societies in Inca. Diamond did well explaining the detrimental effects of the Incan empire but I wish there was more perspective from actual indigenous people then just
Over the course of the essay, the writing did bounce around from topic to topic, but at the same time it did follow an order of events that demonstrate, “how native’s peoples used porous borderlands to project power in ways that preserved their independence and limited the influence of encroaching empires” (Wigmore,
Rarely is the voice of the Indian heard. The pre-European occupant of the land was classified only as a hindrance to the spreading of American civilization to the West Coast. In this book, Brown seeks to remedy the historical injustice
Similarly to the isolation from diseases that were spread by europeans, the geography of the western continent averted the Incas and Aztecs from exchanging ideas and technology with others, which left both civilizations with roadblocks in their journey to advancements within society. Simultaneously in Eurasia, unlike both Incas and Aztecs, the Spanish easily exchanged ideas and technology with others in the continent. An example of the allocation between the Spanish and neighboring civilizations, is the acquisition of the musket, cannon, and gunpowder technology from the east, to be exact, China. In addition, the use of steel along with other metals for weapons stemmed from the Fertile Crescent, in the Middle East. Subsequently to the Little Ice Age, the Spanish acquired cattle and domestic animals for agricultural purposes and in result, required less people to work in the farming industry.
Similarly to what Brown does for our understanding of gender and power in colonial Virginia, Daniel Richter attempts to do by calling for a new perspective of Native American history with regards to westward expansion. In Facing East from Indian Country, he acknowledges how the difficulties presented by a lack of historical sources and distances of time make it impossible to see the world through the eyes of Native Americans. The best historians can do is to “capture something of how the past might have looked if we could observe it from Indian country.” Richter calls for researchers to break with tradition and examine colonization looking from the west to the east. In doing so, the author forces Native Americans to the front, and views Europeans
The colonizers “thirst for expansion” lead to various “encounters” with the Iroquois people, resulting with dramatic changes in territory, population, social and economic development. By examining the relationship between the colonizers and the Native American Iroquois Tribes,
Gabby Ryals SPAN 322 Prof. Ebacher Mini-essay 1 Columbus We must acknowledge that indigenous peoples inhabited the land for thousands of years before Christopher Columbus "discovered" it. Acknowledgement is the necessary step to construct a more equitable and just society. We must accept the consequences of colonialism, including indigenous peoples' displacement. We must acknowledge this truth in order to move forward and ensure the preservation of the land's and its people's history. We must take action to improve societal equity and justice.
Collision at Cajamacra One of the greatest impacts on modern human history was the shift in the population which was essentially caused by the Europeans colonization of the New World. As the Europeans venture out to explore what to them meant to look at unknown and unclaimed land, they soon found out that the land was not without their inhabitants. This ultimately led to the meeting between Old World and New World which set in motion to conquer and claim the land and their people as their own. The effects had created the destruction and diminish of several thousand Native Indians groups whose contact of the New World had change everything they once knew.
The conquistadors had many factors that had helped them conquer the large Native American civilizations that had already inhabited the Americas, but the greatest factors working in their favor were disease, technological advances, and tactics they used against the Native Americans. When the Europeans arrived to the Americas, they were set on their conquest to explore and to hopefully gain more wealth from conquering the Native American civilizations. The overall arrival of the Europeans would change the course of history and lead to devastating effects for the Native Americans. One of the first things that the Native Americans were affected by was the diseases that the conquistadors brought over from Europe.
However, it would all soon be destroyed and be in pieces. Even though the Aztecs, Incas, and Mayas had advanced technology the Europeans brought different technology and livestock. These improvements cost a lot of money, though. Spanish invaders known as conquistadors destroyed religious structures and slaughtered non-Christians while enslaving indigenous. Cultural items were permanently gone and cities were destroyed.
One of the biggest and main reasons due to why the Aztec civilization collapsed was because when the Europeans arrived and brought deadly diseases such smallpox, measles and influenza. These diseases were introduced in Mexico and Peru at the year September-November 1520 and was deadly and bad enough to kill 80% of the Aztecs which is approximately 15 million people. Not only did the disease kill people but they also destroyed their land and culture, this caused the Aztecs to struggle a lot. The topic of this essay is about how the Europeans brought the diseases to the Aztecs and caused them to fail and collapse.
When the English arrived the Natives were “bold and audacious as they dare [came] unto [the English’s] forts, truck and trade with [them]...” (Strathcey 21). The Native Americans from the individual people all the way to their hierarchy, justice system and willingness to adapt set them in the same category of eliteness and intricacy as all other foreign societies at the
The Colonisation of Latin America had a major negative impact on these indigenous people as the arrival in Latin America collided with 12,000 years of isolation from Eurasia which imposed many diseases on the natives. The natives were unable to fight of these diseases as they did not have the immune system for these types of sickness nor the appropriate medicine so many of them died as a result. These diseases included small pox, measles and influenza, bubonic plagues, cholera and tropical
Native Americans flourished in North America, but over time white settlers came and started invading their territory. Native Americans were constantly being thrown and pushed off their land. Sorrowfully this continued as the Americans looked for new opportunities and land in the West. When the whites came to the west, it changed the Native American’s lives forever. The Native Americans had to adapt to the whites, which was difficult for them.
Losing one’s cultural knowledge, and therefore the reality of their culture, allows others to have control over their collective and individual consciousness as well as their destiny. In this case, it is clear that the United States government has had the dominant relationship over the Native
In contrast, the Spanish were able to conquer the Aztecs and Incas much quicker. Some of this was due to help they received from other groups of Natives and the situations that were present in these societies when the Spanish arrived. Most of this was due to the debilitating effects European diseases had on Native Americans. Another difference between the two groups’ interactions is the different ways the Africans and Native Americans reacted to the Europeans’ presence. Since the Americas had been isolated from the rest of the world before 1492, they did not know how to react to the arrival of the Europeans and were frightened by how different they were.