Stories of our own and the stories of other people – real people we see around us every day – are the foundation of all fiction. Fabrications or blends of exaggerated events make up the creative writings that come from a mixture of elements taken from the lives of real people and real events. Unless a person’s reputation is personally harmed or professionally injured, it is acceptable to write a portrait of a real person. Author and attorney Helen Sedwick cautions “…if what you write about identifiable, living people could be seriously damaging to their reputation, then you need to consider the risks of defamation and privacy and how to minimize those risks” (2014). A clear understanding and knowledge of the law, as it pertains to fictional writing, is the best way to avoid and prevent all these risks completely.
This paper
…show more content…
Libel requires a false and defamatory statement of fact, ‘of and concerning’ an identifiable living person (or business entity)” (1). He supports his claims with 29 years of professional experience that he shares on his legal blog writing specifically about writing and the law. Fowler’s credibility is further strengthened working with book and magazine publishers, newspapers, broadcasters, media companies, and online publishers, among others, adding related legal experience and examples of historical court cases, including relevant advice from one of two leading authors of defamation treatises, author Rodney Smolla. Fowler’s purpose of this article is to offer specialized knowledge and critical legal advice, in order to, help writers avoid rare, but costly and unnecessary risks and lawsuits. Given the legal language used in this article, Fowler writes to an audience in need of expert and legal advice writing
He also supported this tort as using some justice opinions. Responding to the public figure argument, Grutman noted that being a public figure should not take away someone’s rights as a human being. If libel could not protect public figures from verbal assault, then the Court should support the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress to protect
As in the United Kingdom the burden of proof in a libel case lies with the
The article, “Alabama Republicans Defend Roy Moore: ‘It Was 40 Years Ago’ goes over how people of the state are attempting to defend Moore, saying he did nothing “immoral or illegal”. Others went on to say he was not guilty of “forcible rape” (Bromwich). 2. Application: The Article, “Alabama Republicans Defend Roy Moore: ‘It Was 40 Years Ago’” by Jonah Engel Bromwich, is a textbook example of the civil liberty of the First Amendment: Freedoms of Speech and the Press.
This article talked about Trump complaining about the nation’s libel laws on a book "Fire and Fury." This book supposedly has false statements about Trump’s troubles with his presidency. He is trying to sue the publisher Michael Wolff. President Trump is trying to sue him because he didn’t like what he saw in the book about him. He thinks they are defamatory and are not true.
The detectives reveal that Gilman Ross, the author being targeted, had previously faced controversy due to his expressed opinions. This created an atmosphere of animosity, which led to his stigmatization. The attacker's motivations remain unclear, but his act represents the dangerous culmination of societal divisions and the potential for violence that lurks within (Richter). By incorporating the concept of societal divisions and resentment from the additional text, we deepen our understanding of the attacker's motivations and the underlying social discontents that contribute to such
First, the words were defamatory materials as to lower victim’s reputation. Second, the defamatory materials were referred to the victim and published by the tortfeasor. Last, the defamatory materials were published
When discussing documentary filmmaking, a common argument that arises is one of ethics. Many argue that it can be the ethical responsibility of the filmmaker to make an effort to portray their subject in the most accurate and “true” way possible. These types of ethics become controversial in such documentaries as Lauren Greenfield’s Queen of Versailles, wherein the editing of the film depicts the Siegel family in an accurate yet subsequently negative light. In Queen of Versailles, editing is used to portray the frivolity and unsustainability of the lifestyles of the incredibly rich and powerful.
(Emanuel and Fuchs, 2005). References Emanuel, E. & Fuchs, V. (2005). Solved! Washington Monthly, Vol.
Printing a private person's name or likeness in a way that is highly offensive and untrue has opened up some of these papers to large damage awards. Invasion of Privacy - Public Disclosure of Embarrassing Private Facts Public disclosure of embarrassing private facts is an invasion of privacy tort when the disclosure is so outrageous that it is of no public concern and it outrages the public sense of decency. In this invasion of privacy tort, the information may be truthful and yet still be considered an invasion if it is not newsworthy, the event took place in private and there was no consent to reveal the information. Divorce situations and relationship breakups may involve this kind of invasion of privacy
In the case “Taste in Photojournalism”, the ethical question is whether the Bakersfield Californian should have published the photo or not. The editor of the paper, Robert Bentley, felt the need to run the emotional picture to remind parents to watch their children at the lake and that tragic drowning accidents still happen. This case addresses the ethical issue of right to privacy of the grieving family versus the paper's right to publish such a shocking photo. Kant’s formula of humanity should be applied as we should treat people always as an end in oneself and never merely as a means. Publishing the picture was ethically wrong, therefore; Harte and Bentley should have thought about the consequences from taking a photo and publishing such
Due to ill health, Mr Jenkins had to return to Australia along with his wife in 18 months. Mr Jenkins contention was that if normal circumstances prevailed, they would have applied for an extension after the three years elapse. There was no fixed date on which to return to Australia as well. Though, there was another contention that, three years cannot be regarded as temporary if a longer duration won’t sensibly be regarded as such. The intention here is a major determinant of the outcome of the
When one allows another person to tell their story, the potential for misrepresentation is enormous, and the same goes the other way. Why has it become so undesirable for most writers to write or tell their own story to make it authentically theirs? As a result of the monopolization of the creative arts sector by Western influence, the number of African creatives that are producing art that is relevant to their continent has diminished. It just so happens that when somebody else then decides to tell our narrative, it follows up with a social media backlash by the people of that culture accusing somebody else of cultural appropriation.
I also believe this is important information to remember for every aspiring journalist. If I wasn’t informed of this I may have unintentionally harmed myself in a future unforeseen libel case. In class we were taught that our notebooks can help us prove quotes are accurate in libel cases. Now I’m aware that our notebooks are able to help the plaintiff prove we had malice towards them.
In addition, I have appeared in significant cases before the High and Lower Courts, the Labour Court, Equality Tribunal, Employment Appeals Tribunal, Judicial Reviews and Statutory Appeals. I chair several professional organisations, speak at events and legal briefings, while being an author, co-author and/or a contributor to a great many legal publications. I am a member of the Editorial Board of Employment Law Report and Employment Law Journal, editor of the Employment Law Report, copy and legal Editor for Round Hall Sweet and Maxwell and a reporter for the Incorporated Council of Law reporting for Ireland. Well qualified with a Master of Laws, a Barrister-at-Law and a Bachelor of Civil Law, as a skilled communicator and negotiator accustomed to the resolution of complex disputes, recognised for first class research, writing and drafting skills in addition to change>a total commitment to organisational excellence, integrity and ethics, insert a line quoting matching your experience to the keywords mentioned in the advert’ or job spec’ provided by the employer.