Frank Deford spent over forty years writing for Sports Illustrated, commentating sporting events regularly on NPR, and has written over eighteen books. On March 13 of 2013 Deford published, “School Bands Should Not Be Entertainment Adjunct for Sports,” on the NPR website. He addresses the middle aged, educated readers of National Public Radio. His motivation for the article comes from the response from the late president of the NCAA, Myles Brand. Deford was flabbergasted by Brand’s remark that students involved in musical extracurricular received genuine scholarships, not only athletes. Frank Deford has numerous opinionated claims in his article; however, he lacks organization, proof to his claims, and a professional tone. Deford first reminds the audience of the speech he gave in the past about collegiate athletes being the only students to receive genuine scholarships. Next, He explains Brand’s stance on the issue. Brand …show more content…
In his opening argument Deford references Myles Brand, but he never quotes or gives a full view of the response from Brand. Brand responds to a previous piece Deford wrote, but Deford fails to addresses the text Brand is commenting on. The reader questions the previously written information and why no account of the previous article exists. Also, Deford fails to provide statistics of the numbers of scholarships awarded to collegiate athletes and to band members. The reader does not understand how substantial the difference in numbers of scholarships awarded. Finally, no decisions or significant details from the court case decision of the high school band members are included. Deford lacks all forms of legitimate proof to his claims and fails to back up his statements with statistical information. Without credible evidence backing up his claims the reader begins to question Deford’s
Strachan appeals to ethos in his article by including the opinion of a political figure. President Obama Expressed some frustration with the way universities treat student-athletes -- suggesting that universities guarantee four-year athletic scholarships for students in good standing -- but said paying athletes would lead to “bidding wars” that would “ruin the sense of college sports."
In an interview, former University of Connecticut (UConn) basketball star Shabazz Napier voiced his opinion on student athletes not getting paid to play. The interview was conducted just after UConn won a National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) championship, in which Napier won the “most outstanding player” award. The interview, conducted by Fox News was only one minute and thirty-five seconds long, however in that short time frame Napier skillfully used rhetoric to support his claims. An analysis through the lens of Aristotle’s three proofs, Ethos, Pathos, and Logos, reveals Napier’s aptitude to galvanize his audience to support his stance on student athletes getting paid to play.
The great contradiction is that everyone sees and complains about these issues that plague college football and take away its amateur status, but nobody does anything about it as long as the benefits are still there for their team or program. Oriard makes the biggest turning point for big time college football being the enacting of the one-year scholarship In 1973. The one-year scholarship came at the discretion of the coach, and it gave the coach complete power of the athlete. “The one-year scholarship, backed by the mindset that it represents, exposed so-called student-athletes to the mounting pressures of an increasingly commercialize sport while denying them a share in its new bounty,” (Oriard,
Over the past few decades, Americans have gained a new regard for college athletics. This has resulted in increased profits for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), which has sparked a debate of whether college athletes should be rewarded beyond their athletic scholarships. Getting paid in college for your athletic skill is something various collegiate athletes would want since the saying goes around that college students are broke. Taylor Branch, a writer for The Atlantic and author of the article “The Shame of College Sports” seems to have his own opinion. According to The Atlantic, “Branch is the author of, among other works, “America in the King Years”, a three-volume history of the civil-rights movement, for which he won
College football, as an “amateur” sport, produces nearly $3.5 billion dollars a year, but the young men who play the game, primarily African American, don’t see a penny of revenue. Yes, student athletes get tuition, room and board, and lots of Nike, Adidas or Under Armour gear, but they’re really free labor. The world refers to them as “student athletes,”. There are three different levels of competition under the NCAA. Division I, Division II and Division III are the three levels associated with the NCAA.
A Rhetorical Analysis of “The Education of Dasmine Cathey” Writer, Brad Wolverton, in his article “The Education of Dasmine Cathey” first appearing in The Chronicle of Higher Education, conveys the journey of a former University of Memphis football player who was poorly educated and how he struggled to be academically eligible. Wolverton’s purpose is to illustrate the widespread of educational shortcomings of NCAA athletes and the complicated ways athletes struggles gets brushed under the proverbial carpet. (Wolverton) In this article Wolverton utilizes a straightforward tone by using pathos to appeal to the readers with Mr. Cathey’s difficult situation also utilizing logos and ethos etc. to help make a presentable argument to which I will be analyzing.
When you think of sports, marching band is not necessarily something that comes to mind but should definitely be included in the category of a sport. First, marching band fits the definition of a sport by being physically exerting and requiring skill. A marching band not only consists of band members that play instruments, but also include the color guard. The color guard is a section of the band that does not play an instrument but uses props, flags or other items to enhance the visual appeal of the performance. Most times they can do as much, if not more, work than the members that play instruments.
All around the world college accept athletes to play at their school. They have amazing skills and do not get rewarded or the publicity they deserve. Athletes represent and show lots of love to their schools. Colleges and governments agencies need to recognize the importance part that college athletes play in the status of their institutes of higher learning. College athletes perform at an very high level.
College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.
In his article “Should College Athletes be Paid? Why, They Already Are”, Seth Davis is able to effectively argue why Branch’s argument in “The Shame of College Sports” is incorrect through his use of rhetorical strategies to the Sports Illustrated audience. Davis’ use of ethos addresses Branch’s trustworthiness in what he includes or does not include in his article. Through his use of logos Davis is able to point out why Branch’s logic does not add up. Finally, Davis’ accusatory tone asserts his opinion of Branch’s writing, which tears down why Branch’s own article is flawed.
Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.
A alternative to preserve existing sport opportunities while increasing opportunities for women, “states could assist financially-strapped institutions to increase opportunities for women by providing tuition waivers for female athletes, thus enabling schools to free up scholarship dollars to fund new programs for women.”
Amateurism in college athletics is an exploitation of the athletes who participate in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) sports. The amount of work that is done by these athletes to help their respective institutions generate millions of dollars in revenue, goes seemingly unnoticed when identifying the substantial amount of money flow in NCAA sports and the amount of people, from stakeholders to alumni, that benefit from this source. Amateurism, the foundation of NCAA sports, has been in place for over a century of time dating back to the early 1900s. Any athlete who is making money for work they’ve done outside of their institution is not being exploited, however, an athlete can easily be placed on the other end of the spectrum when he or she is withheld from recognizing the true monetary value of their talents and likeness that are being used for the profit of the school or others. The NCAA is understandably satisfied with the continuous growth of its’ revenue each year, yet the problem they face of having people accept that “student-athletes” are just amateurs is growing as well.
Steven Salzberg takes a debatable position in “Get Football Out of Our Universities” by guarding reasons on why he considers football should not be prioritized over education. Although I am not a fan of football, I found Salzberg’s inflection and style to be arrogant and displeasing. To persuade his readers, his tone is solid in note to his dislike towards football players. I felt that for his writing to be an argumentative piece, he should have used more logic to support his argument. College football is very important to the lovers of football.
Student Attendance at Sporting Events The University of Illinois at Springfield provides students with a top-notch education and is one of three schools under the University of Illinois school system. While education is the main purpose of attending college, gaining a sense of school pride, bonding and making everlasting memories is also a very important part. Attendance and comradery at sporting events is a problem at UIS that has been brought up by students, faculty, and community members. Sporting event attendance has been documented as a problem by photos, comparisons to other schools and through fan testimonies of their experiences at games.