The election of Andrew Jackson in 1828 marked a significant change in American politics. Jackson represented the emergence of a new middle and working class America. A war hero, tobacco chewer, and a defender of his wife, Jackson portrayed the life a true southerner. As president, Andrew Jackson embraced the role of protecting "common men" his decisions in the matters such as the war on the US National Bank, the Indian Removal Act, and abuse of the spoils system were acts of tyranny. Andrew Jackson saw his decisions as and advancement for democracy, but the rest of America saw it as a reason to rid him from democracy. Andrew Jackson's enemies declared him a tyrant, yet represented the people that elected him and certainly advance the cause …show more content…
As a growing country America needed a strong trustworthy bank that could lend and borrow money as if it was a daily routine. Jackson denied the idea of a bank because it supported the national power which was not "common man" which was he stood for. Letting his hate for the national bank overcome his mind he tore it down like a savage. George Washington and Alexander Hamilton had instilled the National Bank to serve as a safe haven for federal funds, but Jackson saw it as a privilege for the rich. Jackson, being narrow minded, never thought about the rich or how his action towards the National Bank could hurt not only the rich but the poor. He made it clear that he planned to challenge the constitutionality of the bank. After Congress agreed that the bank was indeed constitutional , the obstinate president vetoed the attempt to draw up a new charter for the bank. Biddle, who was in charge of the bank, was infuriated and publicly criticized him saying, "Just because you have scalped Indians and imprisoned Judges does not mean you are to have your way with the bank." Jackson ignored the ruling of Congress and the serious negative effects destroying the national bank could have, and removed all federal funds from the Second Bank. Impulsive and self centered choices lead to his tyrannical ruling of shipping the Native Americans out of their …show more content…
Andrew Jackson wanted to "purify" the corruption and arrogance that was becoming of the government officials. This was a substantiate thought and could have beneficial results except it awarded people based on favors rather than merit. High-ranking government officials were swept from their positions and followers who championed and supported Jackson's cause came in for special favor. The post office was the largest department in the federal government, and had even more personnel than the war department. In one year four hundred twenty three postmasters were rid from their positions, most with extensive records of good service. It then became evident that loyalty was better than competence leading to a long term negative effect on the overall effectiveness of the federal
Especially when he defied the supreme court and did not take no for an answer when it came to the Trail of Tears or when he threatened South Carolina and even when he killed a man for insulting his wife. Andrew Jackson had a fulsome flattery which lead him into presidency. Many bad things happened with Andrew Jackson. He was well known for his involvement in forcing the movement of the Cherokee Indians that wanted to live in peace with the white people who lived close by in Florida and Georgia.
This leads to the topic, why did Jackson want to destroy the bank? Well first I need to tell you what the second bank was and what kind of roles it played in the economy. They had the power to act exclusively as the federal government's financial agents. The bank did many other things like half federal deposits, made transfers to federal funds between states, and dealt with payments or receipts involving the federal government.
Andrew Jackson hated the National Bank just like Thomas Jefferson however he took it to a whole other level. Jackson - “He believed that an economy built on credit was inherently unstable and a person who made his money through speculation rather than the production of something real—like a crop or a manufactured good—was less independent and less virtuous. He believed that an economy that rested on the circulation of paper—inflated bank notes, stock certificates, and bonds —was unstable and morally suspicious.” Jackson’s opposal and killing of the National Bank caused an economic depression within the States. The Panic of 189 - “Banks throughout the country were unable to make good on customers' claims for specie and were forced to close their doors.
He set up “pet banks” in order to actively try to take the bank down. It took many years for Jackson to successfully dismantle the Bank of the United States, and in 1833 he finally destroyed it. Today, a bank where the federal government is controlling it is non-existent. This major change is due to Andrew Jackson’s persistence in successfully dismantling the institution. Overall, the elimination of the National Bank marked a turning point in American political life because it gave the Federal government less power and more power to the
Jackson despised the Second Bank of the United States, as he believed it favored the wealthy, it was privately owned, and he lost his own money once with a bank. He thought his hatred for the bank would be used against him in the next election, which was the plan, but it did not work out in the way Clay expected it to. As Jackson was attempting to end the bank, Clay tried to recharter the it, hoping that when Americans saw Jackson’s veto, they would be furious and he would lose the election. While Clay thought this plan was foolproof, the bank was never a legitimate concern for most citizens, so Jackson won the election for the second time. Once he had been re-elected, Jackson killed the bank by taking federal money out of it and giving power back to the states, but this inflated the price when the money is not backed.
There are many different perspectives of Andrew Jackson. Some people think that he is a hero, but others may feel that he is a villain. Despite starting out with a humble beginning and enduring numerous tragedies, Jackson grew up to be a fierce and merciless fighter who always succeeded. His many personalities included a strong will and an arrogant attitude. He didn’t care about the thoughts of anyone, he always did what he thought was beneficial to him proving that he was in fact a villain.
Ariana Jones Ms. Galvin APUSH Unit 3 Essay 28 October 2014 Andrew Jackson had many ideas about what could make democracy in America greater, which gained him a large group of supporters from all around the nation. The people saw Jackson as many things from the “Frontier Aristocrat” for his vast life experience to “Old Hickory” because of his toughness. The people loved his jack-of-all-trades persona, which many thought made him the personification of the west. He commanded fear and respect from his subordinates, and was known for his unflexing ways when it came to achieving what he wanted. The era of Jacksonian Democracy demonstrated the extensive power of the "common man" through the leadership of Andrew Jackson, a self proclaimed “common
The founders of the United States did their best to create a government that would not allow erroneous decisions to greatly harm the nation. They set a percent of presidents being politically sound and well-known; their beliefs for how the nation should be handled were essential to their campaign. President Andrew Jackson, however, did not follow this system, instead winning primarily by his personality and popularity amongst the common American. While his actions in office often appeared to be for the people, most had a hidden selfish side to them that he easily covered up. With the election of 1828, Jackson radically changed American politics, focusing them more on public appearance and personal character than on intelligence and political views, making personality just as, if not more important than the actual politics of a political term.
Andrew Jackson presidency focused a lot on small government and pleasing the common man. He attempted to shut down national banks to make government smaller. Jackson also enforces things like the Indian Removal Policy, which strengthened the bond between Jackson and the common man. Jackson was the first and only president to make the country debt too. All of these impacted are government today very much as well as other governments around the world.
Andrew Jackson promoted democracy well. This is true because he kept peace and stability between the nation and he provided people equal rights. Jackson
Because of these infringements on the rights of the people, Andrew Jackson was not a champion of the common man; the nickname “King Andrew,” from his opponents was accurate. When he was elected president, Andrew Jackson felt that he needed to remove John Quincy Adams’ appointees from office. To him, the clear answer was to replace them with his own followers and friends, creating a government where only one political party was effectively represented by presidential appointments. This use of the spoils system put people who were not qualified in powerful positions simply as a reward for supporting Jackson. He also had thirteen unofficial members in his cabinet to advise him.
From what I read and what he said, I thought it sounded like he didn’t want to shut down the United States Bank. And then in Document 5, Webster acted like Jackson should put an end to the bank by saying, “It manifestly seeks to inflame the poor against the rich, it wantonly attacks whole classes of the people, for the purposes of turning against them the prejudices and resentment of the other classes.”
One of the biggest thing that Jackson had done as a president was in 1832. Jackson vetoed a bill that would renew the second bank charter early. Jackson stated “I will kill it!”. He said this because he didn’t like the bank at all and he believed that it made the rich richer and the poor poorer. He said in his veto message “It is easy to conceive that great evils to our country and its institutions might flow from such a concentration of power in the hands of a few men irresponsible to the people.”
The bank was immensely beneficial to a small group of individuals, and harmful to the rest of the nation. Therefore, Jacksons action were due to his promise to defend and support the “common man” of the nation in order to withhold American values and his own ideals of
Andrew Jackson’s form of management was substantially disliked throughout the