ipl-logo

Andrew Jackson Persuasive Essay

465 Words2 Pages

Andrew Jackson’s presidency is very much like that of a monarch. He abuses his presidential powers and forced things to go his way even if it means he has to use the military. These power-hungry qualities define him as a bad president, and good that he has done for the United States is outweighed by his cruel and unfair actions which are morally irredeemable. Firstly, during his presidency he instituted the spoils system, which he rewards his supporters with jobs. More importantly, these jobs were government positions. When he was in power he replaced 10% of government officials with people who loved him. What makes this so bad is that it was an unfair system where the government was biased in Jackson’s favor. Andrew Jackson could have appointed …show more content…

Georgia Supreme Court case. The court ruled that the Native Americans were its own individual community, so they have the right to their own territory. Andrew Jackson, however, hated this ruling. He and Congress passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, which forced the Native Americans to move out of their rightful home to westward of the Mississippi, a place unfamiliar to them. Natives Americans who defied Jackson were forced out by his military, which then brought upon the Trail of Tears. The Trail of Tears eliminated generations of Native American families and culture all because of Andrew Jackson’s intolerance of them. His racist decisions were unforgivable. Even though Jackson may have expanded democracy by increasing the voting pool to the “common man”, he only expanded it to all white men. Which is ultimately, unimpressive since white men were already considered to be superior to everyone else. Anyone else could have opened voting to all white men and be praised for it since their opinions are already so dominant. Also, even if Jackson has weakened the upper class by vetoing the corrupted National Bank, he has done it through the abuse of his powers. In brief, the good Jackson has done was just expanding voting to more white men and abusing his powers to veto a

Show More
Related

  • Andrew Jackson Dbq Essay

    187 Words  | 1 Pages

    It is clear from the documents that Andrew Jackson acted like a king/tyrant. One reason that Andrew Jackson acted like a king was because he didn't listen to congress and he went against the U.S. Constitution. Document four stated that he sent soldiers to force Native Americans out of their homes at gunpoint and into stockades. After a few months of living in the stockades, the soldiers forced the Native Americans into the Indian territory called Oklahoma.

    Read More

  • To What Extent Was The Age Of Jackson Dbq

    1886 Words  | 8 Pages

    Jackson received harsh criticism for acting without the consent of Congress since he had gone beyond the scope of his constitutional authority. During this era of his reign, he is behaving as though he is the king and is obstructing every other thing. Jackson was the first president to declare that the president is the most important democratically elected official in the country and to greatly expand executive power. Furthermore, Jackson had engaged in the Spoils System and Rotation of Officeholders during his presidency. The Spoils System addressed a method of having favoritism towards a person or group.

    Read More

  • How Did Andrew Jackson Choose The Other Government

    202 Words  | 1 Pages

    He was notorious for giving those jobs to his friends and people that voted for him. The way that Jackson chose his other government

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Dbq Essay

    224 Words  | 1 Pages

    Without question Andrew Jackson hd all the power and acted as he was the king. This form of monarchy makes one individual too strong and does not follow the Democrat way. Furthermore Jackson likes to do things independently without any help showing more of anti democrat views. Where a democrat would share power. According to the map in document 10 it shows the Indians being removed from their own land and home.

    Read More

  • How Did Andrew Jackson Abuse His Power

    423 Words  | 2 Pages

    Have you ever thought of the real impact Andrew Jackson had on the U.S. I think he was not the right fit for the office. Andrew Jackson’s presidency was terrible. My first point is that he abused his power and acted like a king. My second point is he caused rapid inflation and my final point is he spoiled people with jobs.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Dbq Essay

    399 Words  | 2 Pages

    Therefore, he initialized the Indian Removal Act, and Congress passed it in 1830. This forced Native Americans east of the Mississippi River to proceed to the west side of the river. The Cherokee were willing to change to the white man ways, but Jackson just pushed them away. When the Cherokee were in alliance with the U.S., Andrew Jackson acknowledged them as a nation. While Jackson was against the Cherokee, he said they were not a nation.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Dbq Essay

    657 Words  | 3 Pages

    Document 3 of National Bank Controversy is Daniel Webster’s reply to Jackson Message. He explains that Jackson is always against always having a higher class in charge. He also says Jackson Is always under the impression that under the higher classes' rule liberty will always fall. These two documents show that Jackson believed in the social and political views and equality of all people. He wanted others to have chances even if it meant implying that liberty may fall under the higher class.

    Read More

  • Essay On Why Andrew Jackson Should Be Removed

    580 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the article Worchester v Georgia from pbs.org is says in the 1820s and 1830s, Georgia conducted a relentless campaign to remove the Cherokees. Then Marshall Worcester took Georgia to court. Congress voted in favor of Worcester. So technically no one could move them off their land. Andrew Jackson didn't listen to congress and when the Indian removal act was passed, he moved them off their land.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Dbq Essay

    1239 Words  | 5 Pages

    However harmless this may seem, he wanted to gain favoritism from the lower class by making it seem like he was doing good for them. But he was powering over the whole bank because of his high status, making his actions not democratic. Backing this up and arguing against Jackson's decision, Daniel Webster's response tells us that; "[Jackson’s message] extends the grasp of [the President] over every power of the government..raises a cry that liberty is in danger, at the very moment when it puts forth claims to powers heretofore unknown and unheard of"(Doc B). As Daniel Webster explained, Jackson is abusing his high

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson's Negative Impact On The United States

    153 Words  | 1 Pages

    Andrew Jackson’s presidency had a negative impact on the United States. He could be considered a villain. Andrew Jackson treated Native Americans in a very brutal way. He forcefully removed them from his claimed territory on the trail of tears. Due to the terrible conditions, many Indians died on the journey west.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Trail Of Tears

    277 Words  | 2 Pages

    Under influence of president Andrew Jackson, the congress was urged in 1830 to pass the Indian Removal Act, with the goal of relocated many Native Americans in the East territory, the west of Mississippi river. The Trail of tears was made for the interest of the minorities. Indeed, if president Jackson wished to relocate the Native Americans, it was because he wanted to take advantage of the gold he found on their land. Then, even though the Cherokee won their case in front the supreme court, the president and congress pushed them out(Darrenkamp).

    Read More

  • How Did Andrew Jackson Have A Positive Impact On Our Society

    406 Words  | 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson did many things while he was in office; he killed the bank, helped end the nullification crisis, expanded our land, and passed the Indian removal act. All these things can be seen as a positive or negative impact on our country. I believe that killing the bank would be a positive impact because by doing it he made the majority of the population happy and it was then considered more constitutional. Killing the bank can also be seen as bad because he abused his title as president by not looking at everybody's opinion before changing the system.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Tyrant

    790 Words  | 4 Pages

    He had a harsh temper and his personality was just not fit to be in the position of president. Jackson was said to be better for the Army and military and that he just wasn’t really capable of the duties of being president. He even said himself that he was not quite made for president. “I know what I am fit for. I can command a body of men in a rough way, but I am not fit to be president.”

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Good Or Bad

    516 Words  | 3 Pages

    He started by replacing many government jobs to officials with his supporters”. This is a major reasons why Jackson was bad. He would be considered an absolute Monarch or King. An example of this is when the Supreme Court sides with the Indians against the state of Georgia, and jackson ignores the supreme court’s ruling. The “spoils system” corrupted the government because no one had a chance to get good at their

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson A Hero

    1012 Words  | 5 Pages

    One of the biggest thing that Jackson had done as a president was in 1832. Jackson vetoed a bill that would renew the second bank charter early. Jackson stated “I will kill it!”. He said this because he didn’t like the bank at all and he believed that it made the rich richer and the poor poorer. He said in his veto message “It is easy to conceive that great evils to our country and its institutions might flow from such a concentration of power in the hands of a few men irresponsible to the people.”

    Read More

More about Andrew Jackson Persuasive Essay

Open Document