Are psychology research findings valid? I returned to school in the early 2000’s to change careers for one last time and revisit by interest in psychology. Planning on getting post graduate degrees, it was advised that I return and take the psychology undergraduate requirements again, as things had changed significantly in the field since the late 60 and early 70’s that had been the setting of my last foray. Being more mature, and experienced in administration and management, a few of my professors encouraged me to assist them in studies they were conducting. This was both flattering and interesting and my early inclination was to directly pursue a PhD after completing the undergraduate requirements. I worked on studies assessing efficacy …show more content…
Not a new concern, it has been discussed for years that study findings many not truly represent things as they are in many fields. In 2005, John Loannidis wrote an article, for the Public Library of Science (PLOS) titled “Why most current research findings are false.” In this 2005 article, Loannidis defined many of the problems that have been validated as impactful. From his perspective, there are problems in both power and bias. Correlating smaller sample with effect size errors, greater number of variables studied, as well as the possibility of financial and political rewards for concentric findings , he also noted that the more current and “hot” the field, the more likely that significance will be found. He continues that research finding are often the result of the prevailing bias of the …show more content…
None-the-less, he also recognizes the value of hypothesis testing without high pre-study odds. In 2012, Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman used strongly worded admonitions that to restore credibility, scientists need to create a replication ring. He specifically referenced the inability of new research to validate priming effects. To address what he terms significant credibility issues, Kahneman has proffered the idea that social psychologist create a “daisy chain” of replications being extremely careful to detail all experimental procedures and protocols (Yong,
Since his doesn’t have solid scientific or statistical reasoning he has to use the credibility of other authors, psychologists, and credible authorities for the basis of his argument. Lastly, he establishes his credibility by means of identifying himself as a writer starting in the third paragraph of his essay. He explains how he used to be able to read long sections of prose but now struggles to get past a few paragraphs. He used to go through books of research to find an idea for his writing and now it’s so easy to simply google the information we are looking for we don’t have to exercise our patience and concentration to find
Marsha McMillen Unit 1 Psychology Discussion If I had to deal with a patient that believed a pseudoscience. I would explain to them that pseudoscience is a non-proven science, that makes claims that make them seem true but they don’t have any proven fact that can back these claims that are being made. It has not been studied in depth such as medical science. I would also tell them that they should consider that science is focused on helping people to acquire a better understanding of the world.
In the book "Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking", the author Malcolm Gladwell explores the world of intuition and snap judgements, which he refers to as "thin-slicing". In order to support his thesis, Gladwell implements a variety of examples pulled from real experiments conducted by psychologists around the country. Gladwell's thesis of the book is that often snap judgements are far more accurate than well though-out, carefully analyzed reasoning. Gladwell supports his thesis with the use of experiments conducted by other psychologists, or instances that agree with his claims, such as the Coke-Pepsi experiment, or the kouros statue incident. His thesis has an abundant amount of support, due to the fact that he gives several experiments and incidents as evidence.
Throughout my academic life, every question and concept that has derived from human interrelations has been answered by scientific research. In my social research class, we have
Goldman discusses the lack of importance for publicity in scientific measures. Currently, psychology emphasizes statistical measures and public forms of measurements
The article provided no detail on how the studies were done, it only included the conclusions. C) The article does not say how many subjects were in the studies that universities conducted. It is unsure whether the studies from the universities can be valid. I would assume the populations that were used in the studies were college students.
(Rosati 332). This researcher describes how it is challenging to prove the accuracy of studies that are testing mental
This shows that as scholar- practitioners we are continuing to learn and be educated. Within the field of psychology, the role of a practitioner-scholar is to build their ability to synthesis theory and application with an emphasis on application. Practitioner-scholars study and obtain research and knowledge to understand the current and previous studies
” Using facts about what Einstein, a well known scientist who has earned ethos, helps Barry characterize scientific research. Once again the reason Einstein is such an effective person to compare your findings to is because of his
Many times researchers doing reviews end up with a chronological catalog of all of the relevant sources reviewed instead of an evaluation that integrates previous research together explaining how it integrates into the proposed research program (Wang et al., 2015). Poor literature review fails to capture all sides of an argument and tends to be bias, avoiding to critically mention areas of agreement and disagreement (Shipman, 2014). Such a review is merely a collection of quotes and paraphrasing from other sources (Willig, 2013). Sadly enough most researchers undertaking psychological research are not skilled in doing a quality
Throughout her essay, Chitwood uses strong sources to strengthen her credibility and to build her argument. Some sources include, “researchers Dalton and Crosby,” “a study by Craig and Graesser at the University of Memphis,” “psychologists Erik Erikson and Lawrence Kohlberg,” and “psychologist and educator Nevitt Sanford.” Citing these sources
When it comes to the science of psychology psychologist are looking deeper into what affects ones behavior and mental health. Looking at the environment, health issues, cognitive, learning, and etc… How does everything affect the overall mental health of a person? 2. Distinguish between a theory, a hypothesis, and an operational definition.
A recent article written by Donna Flagg in the popular psychology journal
Is how believable the results of your research from the perspective of participants and how positive the researchers are of the gathered data if it reflects a truthful information and usually questions with “How do you know that your findings are true and accurate?”. It’s not all about quantity of the data gathered but rather in the quality and content of the findings on hand. In this phase, the authors are doubtful and questions too many things. (Shenton 2004) and another quote stated that to help to eliminate the possible invalid findings, is to cross-reference similar techniques used by the previous researchers (Porter 2007). By the use of these techniques, we are able to evaluate the validity, how genuine the findings are and the completeness of the procedures we have used.