The Fight for Gun Rights In 2015, a man named Chris Harper-Mercer shot and killed eight of his fellow classmates, and injured nine others. All throughout his life Mercer had mental and emotional issues, yet in the aftermath of the massacre, people put more blame on the gun than on Mercer himself (Healy and Lovett). In the past few years gun laws have become more strict because people believe they are a danger to society. That, however, is not always true. Despite the idea that firearms create a more violent environment, guns should be allowed on campuses because they themselves are not the issue. Gun-free zones are not necessarily safe, and guns are not the only potential weapon. In today’s society, guns themselves are not the issue, people are. Guns are “inanimate objects, chunks of metal with no will of their own” (Medred 3) that are not capable of doing anything unless a person takes control. When the person who wields the gun is unstable problems start to arise. According to a study done by the New York Times, “of 100 rampage murderers … 47 were mentally ill” (Kopel 2). In the past few years there has been an increase in the number of mentally ill people in society. It seems as though the government is less willing to admit people into mental institutes, which in turn, explains why …show more content…
When taking into consideration the fact that a gun is just an object, it can be seen that guns themselves are not dangerous, the people wielding them are. Also, despite places saying they are a gun-free zone, it does not mean they are safe. Lastly, guns are not the only potential weapons students are exposed to in their daily life. Albert Einstein once said, “The world is a dangerous place to live; Not just because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who do not do anything about it.” So let us come together to fight for our
No school is genuinely safe if I gun, concealed or open, is present on campus. Many pro-gun believers promote the vitality of arms on school grounds, arguing that if a shooter came into a classroom, a civilian could fight them off with a personal firearm. In reality, there have been zero mass shootings stopped by armed civilians in the past thirty years (Gilson 2013). Theoretically, if a masked gunman were to stampede into a classroom, a teacher or student would heroically whip out a hand held pistol, shoot off the attacker, and save the day. In practice, successful combat interventions are extremely rare: in the only documented attempts of citizen intervention of mass shootings, “those civilians not only failed to stop the shooter but also
Teachers should not be allowed to carry weapons on school campuses because students will feel uncomfortable, it would be expensive for teachers and will require training and students could find the gun and start a shooting.
But this much is clear: guns do nothing to help universities attain the kind of safety they desire and need -- the safety that enables intellectual and political exploration. Guns by their very nature dampen speech -- they chasten it. Colleges simply cannot tolerate
Students today live their day-to-day lives in constant fear of what seems inevitable. The United States has one of the highests rates of school shootings in the world. Society has become so desensitized to these shootings that they are no longer shocked to hear about another school falling victim to it. Even when students take a stand against gun violence, the only solution offered to them is a proposition to arm teachers. However, bringing more guns into a school will only further deteriorate the situation.
The presence of a gun makes an act of domestic violence much more likely to end in death. We need to ensure that college are a sanctuary untainted by gun violence. We believe gun do not make place safer people do. Students can be protected in campus in some other ways than being allow to carry gun. College should have more police officer to keep things safe.
“Taking a gun into a school creates a security risk that wasn't there before, gun control advocates say. What if a child gets hold of a teacher's gun and thinks it's a toy? What if a student or teacher gets angry and knows a gun is in reach? There is no time to cool down (OneFile 16).” There are so many questions that go along with this country wide argument.
There has been some bad history with guns, (especially in the wrong hands). There was an incident at a school in Newtown, Connecticut, where a boy named “Adam Lanza” went into an elementary school and starting shooting at all the kids and staff at the school. When the first call to 911 was sent out it took police 3 minutes and 21 seconds for the first officers to get there. The gun rights are from
Guns on college campuses has been a rising topic since the 2007 Virginia Tech Massacre. Before the Virginia Tech Massacre there were not many laws about guns on campuses or about the precautions that should be taken when selling handguns. Since then there have been many laws and gun buying restrictions implemented in order to keep crime down. However, there is still debate on what else can be done in order to protect students and faculty. One debate is whether or not guns should be allowed as protection for students and faculty.
I do too agree with Dickerson’s arguments. Her use of statistics helps see this issue from a scientific point of view. Some people think that schools shootings are every day events, when in fact American schools are amongst the safest places in the country. Thank you for sharing your experience with us about the time you were at a store and someone had a fire gun. Even though, guns are allowed in certain places, is almost impossible do not feel threaten by it.
Furthermore, allowing guns on campuses will make it easier to criminals and will increase crimes. In other words, holding a gun doesn’t prevent accidents. Guns on Campuses: Flying Bullets Family feud is a long running TV competition show where people are
Second, it is not teachers’ jobs to protect students, as they already have so many responsibilities. They are hard working at school and don’t need more stress from having more to worry about. They are other forms of protection that schools can utilize. Lastly, fear would come upon students because of the deadly firearms in their presence. These reasons most certainly show why educators should definitely not have firearms on school
Gun control has been a controversial issue for years and numerous solutions have been proposed and enacted. The debate sparked after tragic civilian attacks, like school shootings. An example, is the tragedy in 1999 at Columbine High School. Two teens attacked the school, killing 13 people and wounding more than 20 others before killing themselves. Following this attack, numerous solutions have been argued and purposed.
Mental health issues and suicide risks are also important reasons why guns shouldn’t be allowed on campuses. College is a vulnerable time for students. If they are going through a dramatic event and can’t seem to find a way to cope with it, they may have thoughts of suicide. Allowing guns on campus would increase their availability to students who are thinking about taking their own
Guns on campuses make the vulnerable even more vulnerable. Even though having guns on campus would improve response time, having guns on campus would also increases the chances of a confrontation escalating and turning lethal. Keywords: (guns, violence, schools) It’s very disheartening how easily it is to obtain a certification to own a gun. Here in the United States it is easier to get a permit to carry a concealed weapon than it is to obtain a driver’s license.
13,286 people were killed by guns in America in 2015. These numbers haven’t gotten better- and when we look past the thoughts and prayers, nothing is being done by the government to lower the rates of gun brutality in the United States. Current legislation prioritizes the individual’s access to guns over a society’s need to reduce gun violence, often using the second amendment as justification. There is no good reason not to fix American gun laws and make them more restrictive- the second amendment cannot be applied, many other countries have found than gun deaths are lowered and gun violence almost eliminated by stricter gun laws, and guns are easily accessible to those who are mentally ill or otherwise unfit to own a firearm in America.