The applicant did not properly annotate the enclosed application requesting a possible discharge upgrade. However, the Army Discharge Review Board considered, the applicant for a possible upgrade as instructed in pertinent part by Department of Defense Instruction 1332.28 which stipulates that a request for review from an applicant without an honorable discharge shall be treated as a request for a change to an honorable discharge unless the applicant requests a specific change to another character of discharge. The applicant states, in effect, she wishes for her Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) to accurately reflect her character of military service. The applicant further states, at the time of her discharge, she was under great duress, resulting from an abusive relationship with another Soldier. The applicant contends, fearing for her safety, she went absent without leave (AWOL). She contends, it was wrong to go AWOL, but fearing further abuse, the potential for bodily harm, she did not believe the chain of command could assure her safety. The applicant states, in effect, she was not afforded the …show more content…
The under other than honorable conditions discharge received by the applicant was normal and appropriate under the regulatory guidance. Her record documents no acts of significant achievement or valor and did not support the issuance of an honorable or a general discharge by the separation authority. Moreover, the record of evidence shows that the applicant, on 22 September 1999, having been advised by legal counsel of the possible effects of a discharge under other than honorable conditions if her request is approved. The applicant voluntarily request a discharge in lieu trial by court-martial under the provision of AR 635-200, Chapter
_ Good Cause document was very generic and did not clearly explain the good cause reason why the rep payee had submitted late filing of CDR hearing appeal. missing in good cause letter was rep payee was actively pursuing an appeal with section 301 and after further clarification from the office D47 she decided to request a hearing request with good cause.
As you know I have been trying to meet with you to discuss your case with you since January of this year. Specifically, you had appointments scheduled for January 20, 2017, January 24, 2017, February 9, 2017, February 24, 2017 and, March 21, 2017. You failed to keep any of these appointments. The reason I wanted to meet with you was to explain why I was not interested in pursuing this case.
Name of Case: LaChance vs. Erickson Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court Parties and their roles:. LaChance, director, Office of Personnel Management petitioner; Erickson et al Responded Relevant facts: Federal employees made false statements to agency investigators with respect to their misbehavior. The legal issue(s) raised: The legal issue raised was that the respondents, federal employees were charged by their agencies because each of them made false statements to the agency investigators with respect to their misconduct.
The appellant essential accommodation claim went to trial but court excluded evidence regarding to disability. The plaintiff’s is not estopped by her SSDI and long term disability claims. However the issue should have been decided by jury. The court foreclosed to grant the plaintiff was not a qualified individual.
The respondent then sought collateral relief in the state court on numerous grounds, specifically among them was his assertion that counsel had rendered ineffective assistance at the sentencing proceeding. The respondent challenged his counsel’s assistance in six respects. He claimed that counsel was ineffective because he failed to move for a continuance to prepare for sentencing, failed to request a psychiatric report, failed to investigate and present character witnesses, failed to seek a pre-sentence investigation report, failed to present meaningful arguments to the sentencing judge, and failed to investigate the medical examiner’s reports or cross-examine the medical experts. The respondent then filed a habeas corpus petition in Federal District Court seeking relief on numerous grounds, including the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The District Court denied relief and found that the counsel made judgment errors in failing to further investigate mitigating evidence, but the respondent 's sentence did not result from any prejudice from any of the counsel’s judgment errors.
Auburn Police Records department checked Oleg 's criminal history for prior order violations and it showed Oleg had two guilty convictions for order violations. Because Oleg had two guilty convictions for order violations, there was probable cause to arrest Oleg for Felony Violation of a DV Protection Order. I completed a Superform for Oleg. I included the form in the case jacket, copied it to the V:drive and faxed a copy to SCORE jail. Officer Lewis transported Oleg to SCORE jail to be
1-2. Mr. Rote was cautioned that “Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of all or part of his claims.” Id. at p. 2, ¶2. II. Factual Background.
Consol. School District the courts denied her claim of retaliatory discharge the reason being mutual trust and confidence between Procunier and Jennings were essential to the proper functioning of the workplace and Jennings’ discharge was based upon a loss of trust and confidence by Procunier, which was reasonable under the circumstances. 4. How do you legally defend your recommendation? a.
Mobile County DHR representative’s testimony revealed that the case is regarding the custodial parent (CP) Brenda Thomas, and her two Child Support Enforcement cases. The first case is with the non-custodial parent (NCP), Antroy Goff, and her two grandchildren. The second case is with the NCP, Raven Bernoudy, and two grandchildren. On June 19, 2017, the Child Support cases were opened with the NCPs Raven Bernoudy and Antroy Goff for the CP’s grandchildren, Antroy Goff date of birth July 8, 2013 and Zaccues Goff date of birth November 26, 2014. Also, an appointment letter was mailed to her at 321 W Main Street, Prichard Alabama 36610-3835.
Commitment, dedication, and motivation are the three most important values when joining the military. Background checks and months of training are required to ensure that the best is selected to stand strong as one for the best interest of all. Regardless of the requisites, hundreds of individuals devote their time to become part of the US military, unfortunately it is not meant for everyone. Even though the system tries to ensure that only the strong get chosen, it has been proven to be flawed. For example, ex-military personal, like Robert (Bowe) Bergdahl, have left base camps or leaked information to express their feelings towards the military.
When ask Mr. Byrnes about his employment history he replied that he was in the Army from 2002 to 2006 and was honorable discharge. He explained after the Army he stayed with a girlfriend for a little while and some friends however things never worked out because of his distrust of people and the government. He never lived independently so he does not know how it may feel to have his own home. He would feel safe however he might become paranoid or agitated and never leave the home.
Decision The trial court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a true course of action. Reasons
The plaintiff is not estopped by her SSDI and long term disability claims. However, the issue should have been decided by the jury. The court foreclosed to grant the plaintiff was not a qualified individual. The issue is whether the district court correctly granted summary judgment in the favor of the defendant because the shaker table rotation rule at issue was an essential function of the employee’s job.
• The case is determined by the payor to no longer meet the criteria for case management. • The case management assignment has been for
As time passed, I seemed caught in a rigid routine. When I woke, my crazies made it hard to shower. During the day, I worked as an accountant for two small businesses in town. After work I came home, got high, and sat alone in my house. At night I watched Johnny Carson, and on the weekends, I visited my Aunt Claudia.