A voice for the muzzled farm workers, a civil rights activist, outspoken about the unfair conditions migrant workers are faced, and inadequate wage given, Cesar Chavez speaks out in his Address in 1984 Commonwealth club of San Francisco. Chavez describes the injustice and unfair conditions farm workers confront on a daily basis, and what the farm workers, as a union the farm workers, must collaborate and do together in order to suppress the companies - growers - unfair conditions. In the speech, Chavez utilizes statistics, testimony, and repetition to not only win justice for the farm workers, but implement the urgent change that needs to happen in the eyes of Americans towards farm workers. The primary purpose of Chavez speech was to gain …show more content…
For instance, in paragraphs twenty five through twenty seven he uses repetition to emphasize the understanding from the audience to on how the farm workers are going to progress through the life when they were expressed by the growers with complete disapproval to have pride and confidence towards oneself. Therefore, by using that repetition he uses a authoritative and sympathetic tone and gives the audience a strong connection with Chavez was discussing about. Another example, in paragraphs sixty through sixty three mentions how the promises for farm workers in after the election of Deukmejian, they were promised false hope, for instance they right to vote and the right to negotiate with the employer in a civilized manner was all a hoax. The farm workers were going to be thrown from their rights and the unjustful condition will continue for them with no mercy whatsoever. However, towards the end of the speech, Chavez speaks about the future, describes how the future will look like – that they will be growth of Hispanics and their children will be consisting purely of farm workers, and not dominated by growers. By addressing this hopeful glimpse to the audience he was able to raise the confidence of farm workers and Americans about the situation that was present at the time, and be seen realistic goal to overcome. In addition at the last three paragraphs, one hundred and
So that’s why now he was known for being a great labor leader. Chavez saw how fast did twenty-five days past to protest the increasing advocacy of violence within the union. Ever since then he had all the farm workers on his side and always had a chance to show them what was right and what wasn’t. Also he had become a Civil rights leader Chavez had always went against the people that were mean and also rude and had no heart how they would treat every single farm workers just because they didn’t know how to defend themselves doesn’t give any right for them to treat them like animals. Chavez also had promised to end the cycle of misery and exploitation and ensure justice for the workers.
Mr. Chavez worked tirelessly to organize peaceful movements, and stop violent actions from his supporters. Among some of his endeavors were organizing the march on Sacramento, the work strike on the grape growers, and the boycott on the grape growers. These tremendous efforts show his full commitment to La Causa and nonviolence. He would spend 8 years working and organizing movements to protect the lives and integrity of the Latinx community. However, despite Mr. Chavez's efforts to promote peace, his supporters grew frustrated and pushed back with violence.
In the moralistic article written by Cesar Chavez, he uses several exceptionally persuasive literary devices to convey his contempt of violence and his aspiration for nonviolent resistances. He expertly plays on pathos and logos by using sanguine diction, a cordial tone, and juxtaposition. Chavez’s entire emotional appeal is based on the optimistic diction he uses to show he desperately wishes for a peaceful conflict resolution to violent or unjust situations. For instance, he writes that “Dr. King’s entire life was an example of power that nonviolence brings to bear in the real world.”
Something that many other attempted leaders fail at is to develop a personal connection with the people who they want to represent. A farm worker himself, Chavez lived through the mistreatment that many other farm workers received from farm owners. He lived through what thousands of other migrants lived through at the hands of greedy farm owners. Chavez gave them a sense of comfort and trust because he was an ordinary person just like them. If Chavez was going to fight for the rights of farm pickers, he was going to do so by fighting with them.
" In a violent revolution, those seeking change pay a bigger price to pay than the change they receive. He further persuades the audience that violence is not the path they should follow by telling how it will result in a loss no matter what the beginning outcome may appear as. By providing historical examples, Chavez is further supporting his thesis in the minds of the audience that nonviolence resistance has more power than violent resistance does, and nonviolence should be the focus of the farmers'
Cesar Chavez fought for farm workers rights in the field. Cesar’s motto “ Si Se Puede” motivated people to keep fighting after his death. He fought for farm workers because he didn't like they way farm owners were treating them. He did that by boycotting grapes, protesting, strikes, hosting marches and fasts. The author wrote,” The coming years would bring much more adversity: Strikes and boycotts, marches and fasts, victories and defeats.”
Cesar Chavez was a great role model and activist for farmers with bad working conditions. He stood up to large fruit-growing organizations who would not provide well-paying jobs to local citizens. For his actions, he was given numerous awards. Cesar was born near Yuma, Arizona in 1927. He was the second of five children.
He went knocking on doors in poor neighborhoods, trying to persuade Mexicans, American to regard for a U. S. Citizenships and to vote. In the beginning, Chavez was apprehensive and his arguments were crummy, but as he went on he, became very good at public speaking and less nervous. Then, Chavez joined the Community Service Organization. He quickly rose in the ranks. Then, he started to talk to hundreds of people, to try to persuade to stand together and that change is possible.
The following year, he led a 340-miles march along the California coast in order to gain state government to unite the farm workers together. During the time, they also got involve in conflict with other organizations as well. But in the end they manage to sign a three-year contract for pay raise with the grape growers. Their achievement was not only for the Mexican-American workers but for all the migrant workers in the nation. Although during the time, Chavez’s organization got into a conflict with another organization called Teamsters over the jurisdiction.
A man of the people for the people. Cesar is a hero to many because he was a great leader, many even compared him to MLK. he knew what had to be done and exactly how to achieve the goal of getting it done. Cesar Chavez was a extremely effective leader because three main reasons. He had courage and bravery, he had a clear goal and a way to achieve said goal, he was also extremely persistent.
He successfully uses the three rhetorical appeals, allegory, and repetition to get his point across. His speech definitely shows the South it could be capable of amazing success, if the Whites and the African American realize they need each
Years back, migrant farm workers worked the fields of California in horrible conditions such as no breaks and pesticide exposure. Years before that, poor children had to work in factories and mills, losing fingers from accidents as they live off of stale bread and coffee. But two people were able to help these people from the unfair treatment they were up against, Cesar Chavez and Mother Jones. Both were able to give their people a better life to their people, later on or during their lifetime. “About Cesar” is a biography by the Cesar Chavez Foundation (CCF) about the life of Cesar Chavez when he learned the difficulties of migrant farm workers and later on creates a union, helping those farm workers stand up and fight for themselves and
Juan Naranjo Mr Nebeker Government 12-6 September 25, 2014 Cesar Chavez Imagine living a life full of backbreaking work for very small wages. This was the life for the farm workers. The work conditions were not great, illegal by todays standards. There were no work breaks, not clean drinking water unless you paid, and you were not protected by the exposure of harsh pesticides.
Therefore, powerlessness and poverty are knows for the workers in the fields. Chavez wrote his article to build an ethical, logical, and emotional appeal to not only defend the farmers in the union, but to persuade the farmers to react to violence with nonviolent resistance.
Cesar Chavez, known for founding the United Farm Workers Union, sought to improve the conditions of Latino American farm laborers, working predominantly in California and Florida. Chavez’s use of nonviolent tactics gained him nationwide support and eventual success as the UFW became a powerful bargaining agent with landowners. One critique of Chavez’s approach would be that although his calls for reform did improve the rights of farm workers, the change still was not enough to genuinely improve the lives of such laborers. Many still work difficult hours under extreme conditions for low pay. On the contrary, the Young Lords Party, organized as a coalition of Puerto Ricans seeking to improve access to health, food, housing, and education, took a more radical approach when it came to enacting change.