I profoundly agree with Chavez as she talks about, “Repealing the birthright citizenship is a terrible idea” (596). If we as Americans take the joy and pride of people that come to this land for freedom and a new life, what make us any better than Great Britain when we first started to build this country. We settle here for a change of mind and also a change of heart. By that being the case, us trying to take away the birthright citizenship to those who wasn’t born on this soil is absolutely wrong. Firstly, when Will said ‘To end the practice of “birthright citizenship,” all that is required is to correct the misinterpretation of that amendment first sentence’ (601). How could anybody say it was a misinterpretation on something that someone else wrote? We as a nation should look at immigrants not as a threat, but for an opportunity for a friendship. Some people might not have been able to go anywhere, so they came to America to feel relived from the stress that was put a pond them. Thus, many might not like people coming over to the “land of the free”, but what …show more content…
Our nation say we are here to help people. We say we are here to give people a chance to be free. We say we that we will help our neighbor. Many might think like Will when it comes to not have immigrants in the county. One can see what he is saying. We need to put a setting on thing. We need to say this for people want do this. People that come over to America might be having a child and want their child to have a better future. Who are we to take that away from them? Who are we to take the lives of others? Some people might can’t read or know our language, but we will kick them out of the county. This isn’t fair to the people who really would like to do some good for the nation and its
The book “Harvest of Empire” (chap. 11 ) States that “Immigration policy has provoked fierce public debate in the United States for more than twenty years.” However, when this theme is touched, so many mixed emotions are heard, felt, even seen, and this is because this issue deals with everything from consideration for another human being to the country’s safety.
In every way the clause is discriminatory, it prevents 12.8 million Americans including 700 Congressional Medal of Honor recipients (Herlihy) from having the same opportunities of any naturally born citizen. A citizen who is born in the U.S. moves to another country at 7 years old and comes back at 35 and runs for president at 49 is more qualified than a foreign child adopted by Americans at 2 months old, brought up in U.S. schools, taught U.S. values, and remains a U.S. citizen the rest of their lives. The reality of it, in the eyes of supporters, is that it is unjust and discriminatory in an increasingly divided country of “us and them”. Along that vein of thinking, the world is becoming increasingly more globalized, more people have access to travel and immigration. As more and more immigrants come to the United States this clause excludes more and more legal citizens.
A book "Dear America: Notes of an Undocumented Citizen" is written by Jose Antonio Jose, an undocumented immigrant and at the same time Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist in 2011. In the book, Jose describes his personal story of growing up in the Philippines and coming to the United States as a child at the age of 12 without legal documentation. He writes about how he constantly went through the complexities of hiding his status and maintaining a false identity in order to fit in and avoid detection. Considering the topic raised in the book of 'What does it mean to be an American' and who is considered a citizen of the United States, first of all, the definition of what it means to be an American can be subjective and can depend on various factors such as culture, ideology, and political beliefs.
The United States is a nation of immigrants. In both colossal and small ways, immigrants have contributed to American culture, to its economic and physical growth, political power, and reputation of freedom and opportunity to the world. However, debates about illegal immigration have become more heated and contentious as some have argued that the 14th amendment should only grant citizenship to those children who have at least one legal immigrant parent. I, on the other hand, do not believe that the 14th amendment be interpreted in such a way that only the children of legal immigrants be granted citizenship due to multiple reasons.
“Should American Citizenship Be a Birthright” is a debate about immigrants coming over and having kids to give them citizenship in the USA. Many immigrants have “anchor babies” so that they can live in the USA freely along with their newborn child. In this debate they discuss how many undocumented immigrants live here. Also, it is explained that if the country changes the 14th amendment it will not be right, because the USA is made up of immigrants. In Chavez, Linda’s article “The Case for Birthright Citizenship” it is explained how America’s citizenship policy is different than most countries.
Also, St. Cloud (MN) reported in March 2003 that almost 200,000 dollars was spent in a nine-month period on a variety of interpreter and translation services (Official English, Para.1). Another of his points is that he will instruct all law enforcement, hospitals, government agencies, and the public to identify all illegal aliens and immediately deport them with the guarantee of severe prison time if ever caught illegally being here again. I most definitely agree with this statement because it is unfair to any naturalized U.S. Citizen for one reason and it is also unfair for anyone born in the U.S. It is unfair for
The birthright citizenship has caused many problems for America. So, they country needs to take steps to help solve this problem. The next two years might be the best time to pass legislation like this because of the Republican control of the White House and Congress. They would do their country a favor if they abolished birthright citizenship because of all the damage it has done to America. The government needs to kill the incentive to break the law.
According to a study released last year by the Pew Hispanic Center, as of 2008, 11.9 million illegal immigrants lived in the United States, more than triple the 3.5 million who lived in the country in 1990 (Izumi). Immigration throughout the years has become a major issue in the U.S because of too many immigrants entering the country year after year. The U.S has come to a point whether they should deport the immigrants back to their country. Believe it or not, these immigrants are a big contribution to the U.S. If it wasn’t for them, the U.S economy wouldn’t be where it stands now.
3.4.17 What does the constitution say about birthright citizenship: Professor Edward edlard cal state – he testified before subcommittee 20 years ago, the framers of the constitution, the civil war amendments 13,14,15. Section 5 of the 4th amendment congress can to define the jurisdiction of the united states. Congress has exercised this same authority to define the jurisdiction of the US before in 1986 and later with the immigration reform act and with the illegal immigration reform of 1996. Senator Jacob Howard wrote the 14th amendment citizenship clause he defined who would fall under the citizenship clause jurisdiction when he wrote: “Every person born within the limits of the united states and subject to their jurisdiction is by virtual
Immigration reforms have recently been a brewing topic within the media and has caught many people’s attention. This issue has brought multiple political figures and opinions into the spotlight, each accompanied by a plan and part of a political agenda. Central American immigration into the U.S. still remains unsolved despite the efforts of President Obama, who had promised a comprehensive immigration reform. Some believe that America was built upon immigrants, and that smart immigration practices will benefit the economy and the nation as a whole. However, others feel that immigrants hurt the nation by limiting the number of jobs available to Americans, and bring crime and public insecurity.
America is only for Americans! This sentiment has been heard many times especially in this past election cycle. In the south, people often express their discontent with illegal immigrants. In fact, people all over the country debate whether the country should accept “aliens”. This debate over the years has caused several different laws to decrease the flow of illegal immigrants into the country.
There are a lot of controversial issues surrounding this country. Whitin all those controversial issues there 's the “issue” of illegal immigration. I 'm sure we 're all familiar with the term “illegal immigration”. We’re always told about how bad it is. Don 't get me wrong, it is bad but it 's not done with the intention of hurting someone else but to try and change their future.
The United States of America, being a country founded by immigrants, is known all over the world as the land of great opportunities. People from all walks of life travelled across the globe, taking a chance to find a better life for them and their family. Over the years, the population of immigrants has grown immensely, resulting in the currently controversial issue of illegal immigration. Illegal immigrants are the people who have overstayed the time granted on their US, visa or those who have broken the federal law by crossing the border illegally. Matt O’Brien stated in his article “The government thinks that 10.8 million illegal immigrants lived in the country in January 2009, down from a peak of nearly 12 million in 2007.”(Para, 2) While some argue that illegal immigrants burden the United States of America and its economy, others believe that they have become essential and are an important part of the US, economy.
Enoch Powell’s Rivers of blood cautionary speech against immigrants is perpetual and strongly impacted the British population in 1968, and still impacts us today, since immigration is once again an issue. For example, some text headlines from internet websites written in the 21st century read ‘Why Enoch Powell was right’. Rivers of blood focuses on the issues related to immigrants, such as integration, racial and religious differences, and their possible takeover of the country. Through the comparison of the immigrants from the 1960s and those of today, we can see that while both being from different centuries and still having their differences, they experience the same issues.
Additional possible fallacies of the speech is, once people vote against immigration, the people who oppose this act believe this will solve all economic, and social problems. The possible immigration reform is suggesting, the illegal immigrants are saved from everything, and that it was in good faith to enter the country illegally. The speech will persuade people to rethink the advantages and the possible effects for voting against illegal immigration