In most recent discussion of the Chicago Blackhawks logo of the Native American head, one controversial issue has been that the Native American head is not racist. On the other hand, multiple resources argue that the logo is racist because it promotes a poor understanding of Native American cultures and negative stereotypes. I believe that the logo is not racist because it is remembering and honoring the Native American named Blackhawk. The Chicago Blackhawks were founded in 1926. The Blackhawks were founded by Major Frederic McLaughlin. McLaughlin named the team after the Blackhawk division, which was a unit he helped lead as an officer in the Army. The Blackhawk division was formed during World War I. The unit was named for a Sauk and Fox American Indian leader who fought against the United States government in the War of 1812 and in 1832. The Chicago Blackhawks logo represents a war …show more content…
The NCAA, National Collegiate Athletic Association, declared 10 years ago that using native imagery to promote sports teams is hostile and offensive and put 18 schools on a notice that a change would be required to participate in the NCAA. The Washington Redskins also face several protests, political stress, and legal involvement over their logo but the Chicago Blackhawks are unbothered. There is no doubt that the Chicago Blackhawks logo is one of the most recognizable logos in America. It is unfair that other organizations have had to change their logos or are under the process of changing their logos and the Blackhawks have not. However, some people need to realize how costly it would be to change the logo. It would approximately cost 9 million dollars to reproduce a new logo. The Blackhawks' logo was named the best logo in hockey, it would be too costly and complex to
He influenced the NHL to allow him an establishment for Boston, which happened on November 1, 1924. With the Montreal Maroons, the group was one of the NHL's first development groups, and the principal NHL group to be situated in the United
The 1961 blackhawks were one of the few Blackhawk teams that have won the Stanley Cup but may be considered the best. This team had many great aspects to winning the Stanley Cup that year but there were three that really stood out especially during the playoffs. These players were Bobby Hull, Stan Mikita, and Bill Hay. These players each had 50+ points during that season. After this team won that Stanley Cup it was thought that it was going to be the start to a new era of Chicago hockey.
Not supporting a disrespectful team, is what the Cleveland Indians organization needs to see from people from all over. Maybe if people inside of the management of the team would just remove this offensive logo, no problems would be seen. We could all enter back into the stadiums, and finally continue to support the Cleveland Indians. With a small group of people who protest against the Chief Wahoo logo, it is crazy that the Indians haven’t removed the logo from the uniforms. Although a large majority of people sees no problem with the logo, it truly makes no sense why the logo is still present on the uniforms of the Cleveland
Jacksonville Jaguars was organized in 1989 and joined the NFL in 1995. The owner of the jaguars is Shahid Khan and Gus Bradley is their head coach. The team 's colors are to be teal, gold and black accents. The uniform set includes black and white pants with the Jaguars logo on the hip and a tri-color pattern. The team’s logo is a snarling jaguar head with a teal tongue.
He goes on to speak about how there have been many changes in the Redskin’s logos and names, and that the history and pride for the team still remains the same, much like it would if we removed Confederate flag from the South. These two reasons together creates Schalter’s final claim: That because the Confederate flag is a racist symbol and it wouldn’t change the South’s history or pride, it should be removed from public. Marshall, and that he, a strong opposer to integration in the South, was also responsible for changing the beloved NFL team’s name to the slur it is now. This brings Schalter to his second point: the removal
The Washington D.C football team has started a controversy with many people that are from the American Indian background. The “indian” sports mascot, logos, or symbols show an image of the Native American people that is not true. To some this may concerning, but to others this is no big deal. I think that this is something that people and teams should care or think about.
These are all teams that have stereotypes. If a team name, mascot, or insignia is offensive, then just change it; it is just a sports team. Even if a team changes it, it is not like every jock, or sports fan is not going to know theyour new name, mascot, or insignia. Using Native American images and names in professional, collegiate, and high school sports teams do reinforce and perpetuate stereotypes because the mascots and team names give stereotypical features. These stereotypes are mainly coming from mascots.
The Indian mascot was originally designed to render tribute to Native Americans, not as a racial symbol. In the past forty years, changing the name backfired, and citizens began taking offense to the name because they felt like the name represented the color of Native American’s skin. Nevertheless, many fans, including Native Americans, do not consider the name or the mascot to be degrading or racial. Fans of the Washington Redskins participated in a poll that reveals, “77 percent reject changing the name” while in another poll “71 percent of NFL fans did not find the Redskins name offensive” (Lingebach 2). Clearly, from the results of the two polls, many fans would be unhappy if the Redskins’ name were to be changed.
In the movie The Great Debaters in the second debate (Wiley College Vs Oklahoma City College) logos was mostly present. The colleges were debating about if Negroes should be admitted to state universities. The very first argument is logos. The debater Samantha Booke (from Wiley College) said the Negroes hold America together.
In the article "Indian Mascots - You're out" that was written by Jack Shackley appeared in L.A. Times on August 25, 2011. The author argues that college and professional teams should remove negative or derogatory images of ethnic groups as mascots. He wrote this article due to the fact that Native Americans began to protest at the stadiums in which they felt were being stereotypical. This article can be divided into four sections.
"Appropriating Native American Imagery Honors No One but the Prejudice" by Amy Stretten shows the art of a woman who honored her culture and race and refused to continue being offended by a mascot. The essay is to target those in the community that feels offended of what may be occurring in their school also. Student's in the community are the ones who mostly have an opinion in what is hurting them and causing distress at school. This essay uses various techniques to prove its opinions towards how offensive a person may feel toward a mascot. Examples of these type of various techniques come out as ethos, pathos, and logos.
Other teams around the nation have gotten rid of the symbols that are offensive. According to the Syracuse University archives the athletic teams used to be named after an offensive Native American stereotype called the Orangemen . After decades of criticism the university decided to change it’s name to just simply the Orange. The school rebrand was seen as an attempt to remove the negative and stereotypical depiction of Native Americans . Despite this the school continues to uphold their traditions without the name.
“Redskin” is an extremely derogatory term used to describe the reputed color of a Native American 's skin tone. Along with the simply disrespectful terminology, the phrase has a history of being used alongside bounty for the scalping of Native Americans, so it is without a doubt offensive to many people. Washington 's choice to continue using the word as a name for their popular sports team has been the cause of much controversy. Despite the pleas of millions of people, advocacy groups and even government officials to change the name, the sports team remains unchanged. Even the United States Patent and Trademark Office has refused the renewal of their name, logo and likeness, citing the combination as “disparaging to Native Americans" National public opinion polls have found that 60 to 83 percent of the general public supports the teams ' decision to continue using the name, yet only a small majority of fans think the term is offensive to Native
Couple teams that carry names that are very offensive to the natives are the Atlanta Braves, Chicago Blackhawks, Cleveland Indians, Kansas City Chiefs, and arguably the most popular of them all, the Washington Redskins. These teams carrying such names bring offense to all the native
The Tampa Bay Skating Academy website uses a numerous number of rhetorical devices throughout their web site to show their services, programs and information they have to offer. This web site uses these rhetorical devices to show interest to visitors of this site. In addition, I will discuss how Tampa Bay Skating Academy uses logos, pathos and ethos to communicate and advertise to the customers who visit the web site. Logos Through many images and words, Tampa Bay Skating Academy attempts to persuade their customers on their web site to display their programs and activities that they provide. The Tampa Bay Skating Academy even states: "Our coaching staff even includes USA Hockey certified coaches and Olympic and World instructors!"