“In a free market economy, individuals whose work provides the value should reap some of the rewards. If I made a lot of money for my company, I 'd expect to be compensated for it” (College athletes deserve more compensation). Is it shocking that most high profile colleges make billions of dollars off athletic programs, and not a dime is restored to the athletes who make it? A college is a business, and these businesses are extremely money hungry, that will not change, but there needs to be a more equitable partnerships between colleges and the athletes. Most collegiate athletes spend a fair amount of their time with schooling and trying to perfect their craft, which can be painfully stressful and overwhelming. Every ounce of their energy …show more content…
Stressed out people block off their basic communication skills and become unreceptive to ideas, suggestions and even tender, loving care”(Sydney). Stress is unhealthy; the negative effect stress puts on the body can affect how an athlete’s perform. When athletes are performing at their peak it makes for a much more exciting game, which essentially would lead to colleges making more money. Athlete 's from any sport, at any level of play put their bodies on the line time after time. Too many colleges view the athlete 's body as an asset, a way for them to make more money. These students love the game so much, they allow the risk to outweigh the reward. What 's different about college is, by the time you 're in college you 're almost fully developed, so collegiate athletics is the start of more severe, high risk injuries that could change your life. There aren 't many high risky none paying jobs in the world today, this is important for the athletes who are talented enough to go professional because this is their future. Going pro is just some people’s destiny so they make short, well paid career out of it. This information alone should be enough to pay the athletes. After all they pay students for internships to help with their …show more content…
“On average colleges make about 871 million dollars a year off athletics" (Scholastic News). Some more, some less. In the business world, colleges will continue to thrive and here 's one of two reasons “The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) will make hundreds of millions of dollars through ticket sales, advertising, and TV deals” (Scholastic News). Another being education is too vital, and many believing that it is key to having a successful life. “Many people think that college athletes--especially football and basketball players--deserve a real paycheck. Those sports are billion-dollar businesses, so many people say it 's unfair that the players don 't get part of the profits”(Scholastic News). Where does this money these colleges are making go ? How much of it really goes back toward athletics ? These are questions many people are asking, but not many truly knows. What we do know is, the money will not be in the hands of the athletes. The highest paid college sporting event of 2015 has been “The NCAA basketball tournaments, or "March Madness," have become a huge business. As Forbes ' Chris Smith wrote, CBS and Turner Broadcasting make more than $1 billion off the games, "thanks in part to a $700,000 ad rate for a 30-second spot during the
Prior to this, there’s a more authentic comparison when a company builds a factory in an efficient unformed country; paying its workers pennies but making millions while claiming to be doing them a favor by providing a tremendous opportunity they wouldn't otherwise have, stated by Ethan Thomas. The average annual pay for coaches in this year’s NCAA tournament field is around 1.47 million which is based on 62 out of 68 schools in the field on that the U.S today was able to achieve compensation. Thus far the NCAA continues to oppose paying college athletes to which is a hypocritical case. Some people in our society are yet so naïve that they tend to believe on the reason why the NCAA won’t pay college athletes due to their 100 percent commitment to the monetary worth on education and intellectual insight. Perhaps some college athletes might not qualify for scholarships to which they have to endeavor to support themselves through schooling wise.
However when the college sport industry is said to be generating over $11 billion in annual revenues, and refusing to share any of these profits with student-athletes who prompt these profits, is that really in the best interest of the student-athlete? The NCAA has attempted to explain their ban on the payment of student-athletes with several
With the internet allowing up to date stats and scores, TV station fighting to show games, tickets sales and the selling of merchandise, there are millions of dollars being poured into the NCAA and colleges annually. Turner Broadcasting and CBS signed a 14-year $10.8 billion deal to be able to broadcast the NCAA national championship tournament (Nocera, Let’s Start Paying College Athletes). Now some colleges even have their own TV stations to broadcast games. ESPN has also signed a deal with Bowl Championship Series (BCS) for $500 million over 4 years (Wildon). College athletes are the only ones not seeing any of the billions of dollars that their efforts are bringing in.
Annotative bibliography: Should college athletes be paid? Due to National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules and regulations no college athlete is allowed to receive any compensation or endorsement while participating in college athletics. It is very problematic rules and many people and professional do not agree with these rules. Despite all the researches that suggested that NCAA the Universities makes multimillions dollars a year from college’s sport, the NCAA still insisting on applying the rule that no college athletes should be compensated about their effort and time.
The NCCA has collected over 6 billion dollars in 2012 (U.S News). In many cases people would say the NCAA would go nowhere without the athletes, and that is correct. The issue is people think players should be compensated. These are students that have to go to class everyday. The purpose of college is education not athletics.
An article from Trine University states, “It is not uncommon for student-athletes to feel intense pressure to do well in both school and sports. As the pressure to win increases, athletes and coaches spend more time training and feel more stress, which sometimes leads to overtraining and burnout” (). With a huge amount of stress to do well in both school and sports, student athletes often feel exhausted and
If the NCAA can earn millions of dollars from student athletes, shouldn’t athletes retain their fair share? NCAA Student Athletes deserve to be paid because their hard work and time is the driving force behind the profit and popularity of the NCAA. All of the ticket and merchandise sales, television revenue, promotions, and other sources of income go to the NCAA, the schools, the coaches, the event staff, and others involved – except for the athletes creating the value of the NCAA. The NCAA finished the 2014 campaign with just under $1 Billion in revenue, which is more than the NHL and NBA.
College Athlete or Employee? According to the NCAA, more than 460,000 student athletes compete in NCAA sporting events every year. Could you imagine being one of those athletes? Picture devoting 40 hours or more of your week practicing to perform for the NCAA, an organization that pulls in an average of one billion dollars every year, knowing that every time you step on the field you could be risking serious injury. On top off all that, guess how much money you 're making?
The NCAA’s revenue is so immense, they are easily capable to pay the athletes in college. “Although the NCAA reels in over $800 million per year, 81 percent of which comes from television and marketing-rights fees, the organization continues to be non-profit” (Text 4, lines 55-56). With the ability to have a yearly income of over $800 million per year, and the coaches obtaining a salary of $1-7 million, there is no reason of why the NCAA cannot pay the athletes. In a way, it is peculiar on why that with all of the hard work and time put into training and performing, along with obtaining an education, they are not paid for their work. Overall, through the texts that were provided, it is apparent why college athletes should not receive pay for their part in college sports.
College athletes are not getting a full college education due to time spent sports, and they should be compensated for it. They are taking easier classes than their fellow peers, but it is possible for them to juggle both athletics and academics. In Sports and Athletes magazine there was an article with the quote, “Not only do typical athletes in big-time sports enter at an academic disadvantage, they often encounter a diluted educational experience while attending their schools. Coaches, under the intense pressure to win, tend to diminish the student side of their athletes by counseling them to take easy courses, choose easy majors, and enroll in courses given by faculty members friendly to the athletic department” (“College Athletes Should”).
According to Marc Edelman, “An average division one college athlete puts in about 43.3 hours per week, bouncing from the field/court, weight room, and film session, that is more about 3.3 hours more that the average full-time job and they receive a salary. “(2014, para 3) And yet all they can receive, is a pat on the back and a “good job” compliment. While these athletes are bringing in massive amounts of money into their schools on a daily basis, the athletes only get to see that the money goes to their coaches, facilities, and school, which is not terrible but still could be better for the amount of money they bring in.
Are they students or employees? They spend more time with the sport than in school. Student athletes should be acknowledged for their performances. College athletes should be paid to play because they bring money into the school, advertisement, and they perform the same tasks of pros. College kids bring in thousands of dollars every game day.
Paying College Athletes Athletes all over the world struggle to decide what college they want to attend for its sports reputation. The colleges with better reputations like Clemson and Alabama are more likely to have professional recruiters come to their games and recruit young talented athletes. “For instance, nearly half of women’s basketball teams produce less than $100,000 in revenues, while 10 percent exceed $1 million and only two programs topping $4 million”. (Robert & Todd)
I plan to research several questions in an attempt to further my knowledge on this issue in hope to find a better solution. First, a question that must be addressed is how would the payment of student athletes affect the universities? Do all universities generate enough money to pay these student athletes? By comparing revenue between smaller and larger universities, it would help reveal the details of the universities financial statuses and their ability to pay student athletes. To find this information, I will look for university financial records from credible online sources.
In conclusion, college athletes should be paid because they bring in a ton of revenue for their schools while risking injury and yet are unable to afford the cost of living. The time that is put into the sport is the equivalent, if not more, than the time that is put into a full time job. Only thirty-three percent of students receive scholarships, most of them partial. Also, only one percent of all college athletes will play professional sports after their college tenure is served. The NCAA and Division One Colleges generate profits that do not trickle down to the athletes.