I unequivocally believe that Union General, Ulysses S. Grant, was by far the more competent commander compared to General Robert E. Lee. Although the North had more manpower, industrial factories, and revenue, it is because of Grant’s leadership that the Union overall triumphed in the Civil War. Compared to General Robert E. Lee, “Grant adopted the strategy of annihilation” (Carrol 2007, 50). This approach would do him well in the future, because unlike the timid generals before him, “Grant was determined to defeat the confederate army” (Carrol 2007, 97). Therefore, after conquering Vicksburg, Mississippi, he ordered General Sherman and his soldiers to invade Georgia (Carrol 2007, 95). Sherman’s atrocious march to the sea would live in infamy
After a series of correspondence between General Ulysses S Grant and Robert E Lee, they agreed to meet On April 9th, 1865, both Grant and Lee met at the Appomattox Court House to discuss the terms of surrender Grant and Lee remembered each other from the Mexican - American war Around four in the afternoon, General Lee officially surrendered Upon the surrender, General Grant allowed the Confederate soldiers to retain some freedoms He allowed them to keep their sidearms, horses, and other items He also allowed them to return to their homes under probation News of the surrender took time to travel to the rest of the Confederate soldiers
I read a book about Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant. It told a lot about their differences. I am comparing their personalities, their features, and their sides in the Civil War. The difference between their personalities are that Grant was more humble and didn't have much of a temper.
In the end, we see that through Thomas’s leadership skills on the battlefield of Chickamauga and the determination to never give up would inspire the Union after their defeat. Thomas’s brilliant stand would allow the Union Army to escape and regroup in Chattanooga which would lead to a victory and the tare of the Confederacy’s communication lines dividing the South. This would give the Union the upper hand to successfully pursue the Confederacy and ultimately lead to the great defeat of the South. Thus General Thomas and Chickamauga would be a great catalyst to the Civil War that would be often overlooked by many historians of our time. Thomas would not stop here he would continue to be a great impact on the Union by having a hand in the victory
Catton analyzes General Lee and General Grant from the stand point of how they are different in background, in personality, and in aspirations. As he continues, the distinct differences between the two Generals are very evident. Although the distinctions are clear, so are some of the similarities between them. Catton describes them as “two strong men, oddly different generals, and they represented the strengths of two conflicting currents that, through them, had come into final collision.” General Lee was an Aristocratic Man, a man who was brought up privileged.
I gathered that areas of focus within the analysis are centered greatly on the upbringing of both generals. While General Lee showed a more traditional, knightly, and privileged stance on how he was raised, General Grant portrayed a working man who has known harsh work as well as life overall. General Lee sought to preserve that which he already had, consequently paying no mind to the rest of the country. Conversely, General Grant wished for an ever-widening horizon as well as growth and prosperity for the nation. Unifying qualities, however, are less expected than one might initially consider.
General Ulysses S. Grant had a great impact on the United States both in his time as a war general and in his time as president. His role in the Civil War was instrumental to the Union victory and the strategies he employed saved many union troops and ended the war quickly. He had many wins, but also many losses and setbacks that were devastating. He learned and adapted through those setbacks and won the war and the American public. The United States would have had a much harder time winning the war and with recovery efforts afterward were it not for General Grant.
When looking back onto the great history of American leaders and generals, many names notably stand out. These American heroes helped to shape the future of our country, from the efforts of General Dwight D. Eisenhower in the Second World War, to General Douglas Macarthur of the Korean War, to even George Washington in the Revolutionary War. Regardless, each of these brave leaders allowed for their respective forces to attain victory, yet in this caveat, the legacy of many brilliant and skillful generals is lost. Victory does not determine skill, and such a notion has never attested to a military leader as much as it applies to General Robert E. Lee, of the Confederate Forces in the American Civil War. Lee’s proficiency in battle tactics and
The Diverse Politics of Slavery Key Words/ Terms Significance/ Definition Secession: Explain what secession means? Popular Sovereignty: How did popular sovereignty help to abolish slavery? Underground Railroad: What motive is there to use the underground railroads? Harriet Tubman: Who was Harriet Tubman?
Before and after the Civil War, people loved and respected Robert E. Lee. Not because of the side he fought for, but because he was an honorable man with strong beliefs; as a general he was a fatherly leader his soldiers looked up to; and he was a very clever tactician. Although Lee fights for the Confederacy, many people greatly revered him, even to this day. Robert E. Lee showed how honorable he was when he chose to fight for his home state of Virginia over the United States. He joined the Confederacy because his “mother” state would be fighting with the Confederacy.
Sherman´s March to the Sea was the most destructive campaign against a civilian population during the Civil War; it began in Atlanta on November 15, 1864, and concluded in Savannah on December 21.The purpose of this “March to the Sea” was to frighten Georgia 's civilian population into abandoning the Confederate cause. Sherman led more than 60,000 soldiers on a 285 mile march. Sherman wanted his march to be so secret that he cut telegraph line to avoid enemy reports of his location. When he was on his was he burned houses.
General Lee was a great strategic war general. He won many great battles for the Confederacy. The biggest battle he won was the Battle of Chancellorsville, which was against a larger Union army. Lee was brave and never lost faith in his
The Battle of Vicksburg and the War did not only affect the lives of men, but the women were majorly affected. Before the war women were only allowed to take care of the home, the husband, children, and work in mills and farms (Encyclopedia Britannica). Women were not given a tenth of the respect or rights that men received, but as the war progressed that started to change. During many battles including the Battle of Vicksburg women were doing the household jobs, taking care of children, and doing the work that their husbands, fathers, and/or brothers would be doing if they were not drafted. Some women even disguised as men and fought in the war or acted as spies.
Robert E. Lee’s (1807-1870) contribution to the United States as a war general and commander received positive connotations for his commitment, attitude and inspiration on the battlefield. However, it is debateable about his contributions because of Robert Lee’s association in the Civil War (1861-1865) to the Confederate Army that fought for the Southern States. Robert Lee lead many successful campaigns and battles including the following; helping defeat Mexican armies that lead to U.S land gains and westward expansion, battles against a more powerful army in the Civil War. Despite these achievements Lee’s loyalty for the Confederate Army that fought to uphold slavery undermines his success and is highly debateable about whether his contribution is justified or not. Robert Lee’s contributions to his nation begin before the Civil War in the Mexican-American War (1846-1848).
During the American Civil war, both the Union and the Confederacy faced disadvantages, however, it should not said that either said did not have their share of advantages as well. In the political aspect of things, the Confederacy had the upper hand, seeing as the Union was fighting the change and control a way of life while the Confederacy was trying to maintain a current way of life. Although the Union also had an advantage, the leadership of Abraham Lincoln, who is said to be insightful and tactical, the Confederacy still had the highest political leverage.
General Lee chose to surrender to General Grant. Even though he surrendered, he was still a great general and leader. After all, both General Grant and General Lee were very good examples of what it meant to be superior leaders. They both fought hard, and led very appropriately. Both men symbolized characteristics of what it meant to be a good human leader.