Life or Family? In the movie Death of a Salesman and The Crucible, Arthur related the movie in many ways. While watching both movies, you come to know that both men strongly believe in a certain thing. In Death of a Salesman, Willy Loman cares about his family a lot and is set on the idea of the “American Dream.” He tries to become a great salesman and to be successful. In “The Crucible”, John Proctor also cares about his family and is strong in his religious belief. He believes in being a good man in the eyes of god and a respectable man to others. In both movies, the men commit adultery and end up betraying their families. They regret it because it hurts the people they love and care about. Arthur Miller was trying to show the consequences …show more content…
This is where his reputation meant so much to him, because he wanted to be remembered. He had the mindset that he could achieve this and provide for his family and give them everything they want. As he gets older, having flashbacks and almost seeming crazy, his obsession with achieving the american dream is what leads to driving him to lose sight between his real life and his dream. Another thing he felt was abandonment after his father left him and ben when they were very young, and when biff didn’t live up to what his father expected him to be. This sense of abandonment also comes around with each of his failures. He sees one of his failures as not being able to raise his sons to be “perfect”, like when biff didn't becoming successful in business. He feels that biff is betraying him by not following out what he wanted, and it really takes a toll on Willy when Biff walks out on him after discovering Willy with another women. When this scene comes up in the movie, Willy feels like Biff betrayed him all based on that, while Biff feels betrayed because of the multiple times Willy lied to him and his …show more content…
If he would have lied and lived, the people in the town could have potentially tried to harm him or his family, and he would have lived the rest of his life being unhappy with the fact that his good name was now and lie and his was no longer respected. In the end, Reverend John Hale is begging Goodie to stop John from admitting and wants her to convince him to lie. He says’ “Woman, plead with him! Woman! It is his pride, it is his vanity. Be his helper! What profit him to bleed? Shall the dust praise him? Shall the worms declare his truth? Go to him, take his shame away!” She won't do this because she doesn't want to take away what he truly believes. She says,“He have his goodness now. God forbid I take it from him!” She knows doing this would leave him living an unhappy life, based on a lie. This part of the movie brought about many questions. Will dying really help his family? Of course not. His wife and three children going to survive on their own is difficult, but Goodie does not see this as a way of him escaping, or killing himself. She views it as his way of dying honorably. She knew if he lied, he would live his life to go to hell. But if he died a Martyr's death, which was by not blackening his name, he would go to heaven. Although Hale faces a good point with asking her to keep him alive for the sake of their family, Goodie also had a good
In the vindictive play, The Crucible, Arthur Miller writes about accusations of witchery, unfaithfulness and assumptious judges that lead to undeserved deaths. There are many different characters with many different motivations for what they did. John Proctor is a tormented man because he cannot forgive himself for the things he had done to his wife. Preceding the actual play, John Proctor and his servant, Abigail, had an affair.
In a time of hardship, he looks for an easy way out. He lets the Devil tempt him into committing adultery with his servant Abigail. During this time, his wife was sick. Goody Proctor noticed how John seemed fancy Abigail and dismissed her. She questioned John, but
In the Death Of A Salesman and The Crucible, Arthur Miller is saying anyone would do anything from for there family. Through the actions of John proctor and Willy Loman, Miller shows us that two men that are going through rough situations can try and improve their family situation and make family better even if it worsened their punishment. In the play crucible John Procotor cheated on his wife with Abigail Williams and messed his family situation up and made his home life and kids lives a little harder by dealing with that. The same thing happened in the Death of Salesman when Willy Loman cheated on his wife with a random person and was caught by his son and John proctor was caught by his wife.
The poem "To My Dear and Loving Husband", and parts of the play "The Crucible" have many similarities. In the poem Bradstreet states her love for her husband, and how she'd rather not live than live without him. For example, she says, "That when we live no more, we may live ever." This statement shows how much love she has for her husband, and how she couldn't go without him. This relates to "The Crucible" because both of the stories show their love for their significant other.
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible aims to place characters in such difficult positions that they begin to consider death, just as Hamlet did before ultimately realizing “conscience makes cowards of us all.” By this, Hamlet implies that knowledge of the horror of death can persuade a human to do anything, as they are almost subconsciously obligated to avoid the premature coming of this inevitable end. Hamlet’s statement is relevant to The Crucible in that the townsfolk will seemingly do anything to avoid “social suicide” or the destruction of their carefully constructed reputations in the small community. In the play, John Proctor, Abigail Williams and Reverend Hale all experience the unrelenting pressure of preserving their image and weigh this
This shows that John is using his integrity and taking responsibility for his actions. He saw that he had to do this if wanted any chance of living . John is being the bigger person because he knew what he did was wrong. The author writes,“How may I live without my name? I have given you my soul; leave me my name...”(Hill).
The Reverend's passion in urging Elizabeth to convince John to falsely confess highlights this danger: "Life, woman, life is God‘s most precious gift; no principle however glorious may justify the taking of it. I beg you, woman—prevail upon your husband to confess. Let him give his lie" (Act II, Scene 3). The use of the word "beg" highlights the urgency and desperation of Hale's plea, while the phrase "Let him give his lie" underscores the willingness to sacrifice moral principles for the sake of survival. Despite his good intentions, Hale's actions show the dangerous consequences of prioritizing self-preservation above fundamental beliefs.
During Arthur Miller’s life span from 1915-2005, he wrote works such as “The Crucible”, “A View From the Bridge”, ” Incident at Vichy”, “The Price”, “The American Clock”, “The Creation of the World and Other Business” , and “Broken Glass”. Though his writing in “The Crucible” was based on a time before his life. So why Miller wrote the piece has to do with the factors of what was going on around him in America and his personal life relationships that were influences of and in his writing of the piece in 1953. Miller’s playwrights were transcendent to others writing, reflective of the time, giving people a frank view of the events happening, and changed American theater.
The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, demonstrates that all actions have reactions. A simple undertaking can have many unexpected consequences. There is no way to predict what will happen in response to an effortless act. John Proctor is a serious man who tends to speak his mind in any situation.
This showed that he was trying to keep his name clean by telling the truth. When John was in prison, they give him another chance to be freed of charges. They tried to persuade him
Crucible Final Essay Based on what I read in the Crucible and what we know about him, if Arthur Miller were alive today, I believe he would not advocate limiting the entrance of Muslims into our nation. Arthur Miller is the type of person that disagrees with judging one particular person by their race, religion, and what others say about their “kind”. Therefore, we can’t be afraid of everyone that belongs to a certain religion like Muslim just because of the acts of the radical Muslims. This would be like, in the Crucible, if everyone in the towns surrounding Salem thought that all of the people of Salem had to be witches because of a few that were accused.
Proctor’s Opposition to His Society In the book, The Crucible, Arthur Miller introduces us to John Proctor. Proctor is married and simple, yet he's argumentative toward his town for the persecution of “witches.” Proctor faces conflict throughout the town, his morals are challenged and his view on ethical implication are changing.
The Crucible also known as the Salem witch trials and the duke lacrosse case were both a turning point in history for America. Both of the events harmed many people in a number of ways. Although the crucible was a lot harsher, they both compare and differentiate in a plethora of ways. For example, they compare because of the lack of evidence used and the false accusations told upon the people. They contrast because of the way the accusers were treated at the end of it, and because of all the lies told.
Arthur Miller’s exposure of psychological and social issues is seen through his various recurring themes in many of his plays. Some of the themes that Miller uses in his writing can be linked back to events that occurred in his life. For example, in The Crucible majority of the people are accused of being witches because others want wealth and power. Tragedies generally show the sort of impulses, connected to current and past social issues, that drive people. The Crucible reflects social issues such as corruption, greed, or excessive desire for power (Miller).
Arthur Miller, the author of The Crucible, once said, “Guilt is un-freedom. Freedom without any guilt is the ultimate freedom.” Miller introduces the concept of a tragic hero played by the central figure in the play, John Proctor. Proctor is a tormented individual; he presumes that his affair with Abigail perpetually damaged his reputation in the eyes of God, Elizabeth, his wife, and himself. Even though Proctor recognizes his faults and sins by committing to adultery, he lacks the capacity to forgive himself.