In the short story “Tell-Tale Heart”,by Edgar Allen Poe, a man is overwhelmed by many different problems which makes him do terrible things.If the narrator is guilty of premeditated murder, then many things can be held against him that could get him arrested. To begin with, he lied to the police when they asked him if anything was wrong. That could be used against him because lying to the police is a serious crime. A common counter argument that could be brought was that he was just trying to defend himself. This argument is not valid because the narrator violated the law when he lied to the police. Next, he dismembered the body which breaks many laws and could be used against him in law. There would be no counter argument that could help the narrator be proven …show more content…
This would not be a valid argument because he murdered the man while he was there, and he dismembered the body. In addition to this, he hid the body from anybody that was trying to solve the case. This could be used against him because he was keeping all of this a secret, which took the case longer to solve. No valid counter argument would work in this situation because there is no other evidence that could support the argument. To follow up with, he murdered the old man while he was sleeping. This is the instance in the case where he could be charged with a very long sentence, There is no counter argument because they already have all of the evidence that he is guilty of this murder case. Next, the narrator had no reason to kill the old man. The narrator told the people that he hated the eye, so he decided to kill the old man to be free of it. A counter argument that is often used in this instance is that he is insane. This could help the narrator in court, but he would still be charged with murder. To follow up with, he went to the old man’s house at midnight every night for twelve
A. Re Opening Statements: The Prosecution has the job of proving that the defendant, Jordan Bratton committed murder in the first degree by killing the victim, Preston Balmen. The evidence that they have which supports their case is as follows. The police found that there were tire tracks behind Preston Balmen’s house, which matched the tires on Jordan Bratton’s car: a maroon 1990’s Buick Century. It was determined by a medical examiner that Preston Balmen had been strangled to death with a cord-like object and that a microphone cord found in Jordan Bratton’s car is most likely the weapon that was used to strangle the victim. The examiner also determined by the way the victim was strangled, that the suspected murderer stood at a similar
Based on the experiment, it revealed that it was literally impossible for someone to have shot themselves from the distance stated at trial, even for a tall person, who tends to have longer arms. The defendant’s primary challenge to the government was that there was insufficient evidence of his wife’s arm. This argument could be used to defend him, the accused one because in reality, there is no evidence
The smell in the trunk of the car was tested and contained a large amount of chloroform and key compounds of human decomposition. Evidence is evidence but not all evidence is good, but the “smell of death” that was in the trunk could have been used as good evidence to the case. Why? Because they did not have any other good evidence to prove that she killed her daughter, but that one piece of evidence alone could have convicted her of murdering her daughter.
In Edgar Allen Poe’s “The Tell-Tale Heart” suspense is created through the reoccurring use of repetition which, conjures up feelings of unease in the readers. The speaker is clearly unstable. The speaker who is “nervous-very,very dreadfully nervous”(1) throughout the story repeatedly asks the reader “How, then, am I mad?”(1), then goes on to justify his actions. The reader understands that the fear in the speaker is building up, but do not know the reason why. With an unstable speaker the readers are not certain if what is being told is true or just in the speaker’s mind.
The story “Tell- Tale Heart” by Edgar Allen Poe, there are many reasons that the killer could be proved that this was a premeditated murder. Some of these reasons that make this a premeditated murder are he planned the murder, he also dismantled the man’s body and hid it, he watched the man in his sleep, and lastly he admitted the nasty deed. The first reason that the man could be proved that he is guilty is that he planned the murder and waited eight long nights before he kill the innocent old man. The reason that this would be a part of premeditated murder is because the killer knew what he he wanted to do and when he was going to do it. This will refute the opposition because it was planned and when you plann the murder it is a premeditated
They have told you the true story of what happened that fateful night on June 17, 2016. Their testimonies show you that the defendant was not helpless and that she had many opportunities to leave her husband. In addition, their testimonies showed you that the defendant knowingly and premeditatedly murdered her unconscious husband. Unlike the defense, the prosecution and its witnesses have no gain by lying to
In The Tell Tale Heart by Edgar Allan Poe the narrator is guilty of murder because the narrator thinks the old man could never suspect that his caregiver would ever try to kill him, he claims he can recite the story calmly and healthily as he remembers every detail unlike an insane person , and he admits to killing the old man so he is aware he has committed murder. It is important to realize that the narrator is too presumptuous because the old man would never think his caregiver would try to kill him when he expresses this statement “So you see he would have been a very profound old man, indeed, to suspect that at every night, Just at twelve, I looked in upon him while he slept.’’ ( Poe 7).
The author of every book must have a climax. It is the part when all the pieces come together. The anxiety gets to you as you don 't know what’s going to happen next. You try to predict what might occur, however there 's a completely different outcome. You’re on an emotional roller coaster, full of uneasiness where your imagination controls you.
One sign of the narrator being insane is that he has impulsive behavior. For example, the narrator says, “First of all, I dismembered the corpse, I cut off the head, and the arms, and the legs, or … works as well” (12). This means that he cut off the body without thinking about it beforehand. Furthermore, the narrator also says that he did not just leave the body there, but hid it too. All of this matters because it was a very sudden action
In Edgar Allen Poe’s “The Tell-Tale Heart”, the narrator should not be guilty by reason of insanity. “Insanity Defense” states that a man is innocent by means of insanity if he has committed the crime because he is “unable to control his impulses” as a result of mental disease (“Insanity Defense” 1). Similarly, the narrator in “The Tell-Tale Heart” viewed the old man’s “pale blue eye, with a film over it” with hatred (Poe 1). When the old man’s eye looked upon the narrator, he would uncontrollably increase in fury and anger. This led the narrator to “[make] up [his] mind to take the life of the old man, and thus rid [him]self of the eye forever” (Poe 1).
The defense’s argument that the narrator is legally insane is flawed; it disregards the evidence and facts that prove that the narrator is not insane by legal definition. First of all, the narrator knew what he did was wrong. In his confession, the narrator states that, “You should have seen how careful I was to put the body where no one could find it. First I cut off the head, then the arms and the legs. I was careful not to let a single drop of blood fall on the floor.
We have the coincidence that the man was murdered just when the train was passing. Due to the proximity of the house and the noise the train emits the old man could not hear anyone scream. The man also argues that fifteen seconds after hearing those words and watching the father's body fall he watched the young man running down the hall. With the help of the building's plans the jury number eight showed that it was impossible for the man to see the young man running down the hallway only 15 seconds after hearing the scream according to the distance between him and the hall.
Throughout the story, three major details of the narrator’s psyche are confirmed. First, we learned of the narrator’s deceitfulness. Every morning he lies to the old man with the least bit of guilt. The next continues to prove the madness as the narrator feels utter joy from the terror of another. Lastly, the narrator fabricates that the old man is simply not home to assure the officers.
Do you know what your child or/ children read at school? Do you want your child or/ children reading about murder, dismember bodies, lying and acting phony? The Tell-Tale Heart is a story about a mad man with a lot of issues like, being mad, having a disease and murdering. The story encourages lying, murdering, and fakeness. Therefore, I feel tell-tale heart is not appropriate for middle school students.
Humanity commonly associates any man, women, or child into different categorizes of its form of conformity where individuals differing from the social norm are often placed under the category of a mental illness. Consequently, society categorizes human beings with different mental comprehensive knowledges under different medical forms of mental illnesses. In The Tell-Tale Heart, the author, Edgar Allen Poe, presents a narrator that is quite unique from the social norm that makes one wonder what is the possible logical reasoning behind his abnormal behavior. Subsequently, we, as human beings, commonly choose to follow the most logical explanation to believe that the narrator has a mental illness due to his actions and thoughts in the story.