Crossroads Juvenile Center Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Crossroads Juvenile Center In contemporary times, there is an increasing tendency for juvenile involvement in crime. The frequency and the severity of the crimes has increased so much that there are call for trial of delinquents as adults in extreme cases. The juvenile justice system however has a stronger emphasis on correctional activities and giving the under-age offenders a chance to change and make something useful of their lives. The Crossroads Juvenile Center is a detention facility in New York, it development and operations demonstrate the desire of the juvenile justice system to effects changes in the children admitted to these systems. The Crossroads …show more content…
The detainees at their two centers are between the ages of 10 and fifteen and they are held in these centers as they await the results of their trails. After the trial results are released, these Juvenile delinquents are passed on to the relevant facilities or released back in to the community. The center works closely with the related systems. For example, the management collaborates with the legal entities to provide the services in the context of the legal regulations in the state of New York and the federal government. For example, the requirements for confidentiality are a function of federal laws while the requirements for relaxation of the environment is a function of the local legislations. Crossroads Juvenile Center has to respond to the demands of the system because it derives its operating licenses from the compliance to these regulations. However, the compliance is also an ethical consideration because all systems are required to comply with the local and federal obligations(Phillips & Kliment, 2012). The Crossroads Juvenile Center does not merely comply for the sake of compliance and avoidance of legal trouble, it complies wholeheartedly and even invites the policy makers to make …show more content…
There are indication that most criminals have a juvenile records in the US, indicating that crime manifests from a tender age. Therefore, to reverse the incidence of crime, it follows that the best strategy is to reduce the criminal orientation in the juvenile offenders as opposed to hardening them and preparing them for criminal careers. The case of the Crossroads Juvenile Center demonstrates the willingness of the juvenile justice systems to make these changes on the children. References Day, S. (2014). Runaway Man: A Journey Back to Hope. New York: Library of Congress. Juvenile Resident Information. (n.d.). Retrieved December 8, 2014, from http://www.nyc.gov/html/acs/html/yfj/juvenile_resident_info.shtml Leland, J. (2014, June 28). For Young Offenders, a New Confidence Game. Retrieved December 8, 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/29/nyregion/for-young-offenders-a-new-confidence-game.html?_r=0 Phillips, T., & Kliment, S. (2012). Building type basics for justice facilities. Hoboken, NJ: John
According to the book, Lost Angeles County is the largest juvenile justice system in America; yet, the home for most of the youths who have committed grievous crimes. Home for those who seems to have a chance at rehabilitation but are sentenced to adult prison for no logical reason while some youth are freed with little consequences after committing a violent crimes. This is a shameful thing that needs to be corrected in the juvenile justice system. Two and half million children under eighteen are being arrested in the United States in a year, three out of four will be released as if nothing happened, their cases will be dismissed because they are too minor for the system to break-down or too difficult to try. The repeated offenders will receive a meaningful punishment when their offenses have progressed to a more serious level.
Since police police officers are the first point of contact with youth, Officer Rachel Guzman takes a different look on how to handle youth by using the context of her community to assess the norm (Professor J. Peck, The Police, February 4, 2016) Instead of writing citations against youth, Officer Guzman responds to the kids at school by talking to them and building a friendship, which is the preferred method and essentially comparable to a successful day (Professor J. Peck, The Police, February 4, 2016). Probation officers are at times known to spend more time preparing for a case than interacting with youth, but on the contrary, the probation officers in this film have taken a hands-on approach to build a future for the kids they’re responsible for. Rashaad Horton, a deputy probation officer of the Los Angeles County Probation Department provides intensive supervision to 17-year-old Bernie by using interpersonal skills to assess his day and prevent Bernie from recidivating (Professor J. Peck, Juvenile Probation, February 18, 2016). While the responsibilities of a probation officer consist of a few things such as supervising youth, providing assistance, and job related tasks; Tanesha Lockhart, the deputy probation officer of Christopher has met and exceeded those responsibilities.
The federal government’s “War on Crime” by the Johnson administration in the 60s made way for tougher law enforcement and surveillance (Hinton, 2015). However, with this came the separation of children and adults in the criminal justice system; then the separation of juvenile delinquents from status offenders. As mentioned, status offenders are different from juvenile delinquents because they had broken rules which apply to only children. Meanwhile, juvenile delinquents are youths under the age of 18, who committed offenses that would be punishable to adults as well. By the late 1960s, there became a growing concern that juveniles involved in the court-based status-offense system, were not getting their best interests met (Shubik & Kendall, 2007).
The cost of creating and maintain juvenile detention centers is insane. During the 1990s “the juvenile justice system saw a 43% increase in spending, mainly as a response to the expenditures that accompanied the increased confinement of juvenile offenders” (Gaudio, 2010). It has been proven that juvenile’s brains are not as developed as adults and the threat of detention does not affect them as much as it would in an adult so it would not be as affective at deterring crime. Being incarcerated also may make a juvenile more likely to reoffend once they are released.
[CITE] Therefore, incarcerating young offenders is an ineffective way in preventing the juvenile rate. Instead, it increases their chance of recidivism. Although there is structure in correctional facilites, there is a lack of positive reinforcement
A compilation of 6 different studies provided by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention found that not only did juveniles have a higher recidivism rate, but they were also more likely to recidivate sooner and more often after being released (Scialabba). Recidivism shows the immaturity of juveniles and how sentencing them as adults will not rehabilitate them nor teach them a
Not only does Berstein call for an overall reform of this nation’s juvenile prisons, she goes as far as saying the practice of locking up youth is in need of a “more profound than incremental and partial reform” (13). The fact that Bernstein outlines the numerous failed strategies and goals of this practice with her compelling use of studies and statistics is enough to promote an audience to reject the practice of locking up youth. The statistic she shares that “four out of five juvenile parolees [will be] back behind bars within three years of release” as well as the studies she conducted on numerous instances when a guards abuse of power lead to the death of a child work to further prove her point: being that “institution[s] as intrinsically destructive as the juvenile prison” have no place in a modern society (13, 83). Bernstein refutes this false sense effectiveness further by sharing her own ideas on what she believes works as a much more humane solution to rehabilitating
Annotated bibliography Childress, S. (2016, June 2). More States Consider Raising the Age for Juvenile Crime. Retrieved from PBS: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/more-states-consider-raising-the-age-for-juvenile-crime/ More states are considering to raising the age for juvenile crimes before being tried as adult because young offender's mental capacity. The idea is to cut the cost of incarcerate young offender in adult prison and ensure offenders to receive proper education and specialized care to change their behavior. Putting children in adult prison does not deter crime.
Imagine being a child imprisoned for committing a crime for which you did not understand the consequences. Alone and afraid, with only hardened criminals and psychopaths as adult role models, you live in fear. Through a vicious combination of physical, sexual, emotional, and mental abuse, there is no option but to turn back to crime as an adult, and continue the cycle. This is a daily reality for thousands of American juveniles. Yet, we continue to call it the juvenile justice system.
The “Primetime: New Model for Juvenile Justice” video discusses that kids in Missouri commit crimes because the families are not supportive, kids are abused by the parents and feel abandon by their parents, and the new model of the juvenile justice system in Missouri. Most importantly is the fact that the model consisting of programs such the Rosa Parks Center and Waverly Youth Center should be followed or attempted as it shows it works to rehabilitate the kids. Both programs are not a jail but a place in which kids share their problems and feelings in a small group setting. Missouri Juvenile Justice system knew that the traditional juvenile jail did not work in Missouri so the creation of these youth centers to work with kids’ behavioral problems.
There are differences between a juvenile court and criminal court in the United States. The focus of the juvenile justice system is on rehabilitation, in hope of deterring the minor away from a life of crime so they will not commit a crime again as an adult. In contrast, the criminal justice system focuses on the punishment and often bases the sentencing outcome on the criminal history of the youth. In a study conducted, Butler (2011) showed that the participants’ experience with adult jails and prisons show that those facilities may instill fear but are otherwise emotionally—and often physically—dangerous for youth. Many of the adult prisoners, who were minors when they enter the adult institution, felt they were forced to “grow
Within the urban communities, negative perceptions are magnified. Adolescents are more prone to be a product of their environment, especially those whose parents are incarcerated. Because of this trend adolescents are being incarcerated at an alarming rate and sentenced to adult facilities. Lambie & Randall (2013) states, the United States have imposed harsher penalties on serious young offenders, and have consequently increased rates of incarcerated youth and made it easier for youth to be treated and incarcerated as adults within the justice
Nicole Almestica Community Corrections (Instructor: Kathleen A-Mickel) What Works (Position Paper) Wilmington University Abstract The juvenile programs that are discussed are Outward Bound, Phoenix Youth and Family Services (Southeast Arkansas), and Project New Pride. All three programs push towards improving the lives of juveniles who are troubled.
This concern is shared by federal, state, local government government officials, and the public. According to Siegel and Welsh (2011), an estimated 1.7 million youths, under 18 years of age, are arrested each year for committing crimes that rage from loitering to murder, and this number is expected to rise (p. 10). Additionally, more than 250,000 juveniles are arrested each year for committing a status offenses, and roughly 160,000 of these offenses are petitioned to the juvenile court (Siegel & Welsh, 2011, p. 22).
(1994). JUVENILE OFFENDERS: WHAT WORKS? A Summary of Research