Austin Barnes
Mrs. Simon
English 12
14 March 2023
Defunding The Police is a Bad Idea
Defunding the police has been a raging outcry ever since the death of George Floyd occurred in 2020. Naturally as people panic they don’t know how to deal with incidents properly and handle emotions and their first thought is to defund the police completely as a whole. As I do understand the frustration of the people over bad and unprofessional police work resulting in a death, I believe defunding the police is an impulsive response and a rather spur of the moment idea. People that support defunding of law enforcement don’t realize the consequences of this action. Just 3 reasons why this is a bad idea are, less training to deal with incidents which result in
…show more content…
Defunding the police means a lot of crimes go unsolved or not prioritized. Police wouldn’t have enough funding for resources like crime investigation tools and well trained officers. Less training means officers will not know how to properly pursue investigations and arrest suspects. Defunding the police also means less officers at work in the field. Departments will not have enough money to pay employed officers, so the amount of officer staff shrinks. This causes a lot of officers to have to work forced overtime with less pay. Due to decreased budgets as a result of defunding police departments, many officers work a second job to support their families. Police officers working a second job means less time and experience in the field which leads to violent events as a result of a lack of on the job experience. Officers working a second job will definitely add extra stress and fatigue in their daily lives and as a result makes officers not as alert and oriented. In conclusion I believe every law enforcement officer must receive proper pay to support their families and not have to work an extra job to due so, a full time job let alone a protector of the public should be able to support you financially enough to live in a decent home and have enough money for daily needs and …show more content…
Helfgott(June 9th 2020 at 4:26
“...Much of the recent crime increase threatens the vitality of America’s cities–and thousands of lives–it is not, in itself, the greatest danger in today’s war on cops. The greatest danger lies, rather, in the delegitimation of law and order itself’ (Mac Donald). In the book “The War on Cops: How the New Attack on Law and Order Makes Everyone Less Safe,” published in the year of 2016, author Heather Mac Donald provides credible evidence to expand on her viewpoint of our country’s current criminal crisis. In addition to “The War on Cops, Mac Donald has written two other books. Her works “Are Cops Racist?”
When facing this issue, some people are to believe that cops have more important things to do, whether it be a larger, full-scale crime, or them just not caring. It is apparently believed that those working to fix issues regarding crime, have no taste for the smaller, “irrelevant” ones that face society frequently. Whereas the distrust in our safety system stems from is without reach of comprehension, but the fact of the matter still stands behind the fallacies. Cops, although given a bad reputation through movies and society, have a job to prevent and fix any crimes that come their way, large-scale or small-scale. The small misbehaviors that
Jason Ke ENG2D1 Ms.Doak 11 March 2022 Racism and police brutality As humanity progresses, we become more inclusive of those who are different from us, but there are still many communities around the world that hold heavy discrimination, and if you add some police corruption on top of that, you end up with Starr’s life from "The Hate U Give" by Angie Thomas. Have you ever heard of racism? Or uncontrollable police violence? Have you ever witnessed racism?
In America, the issue of the defunding of the police is a serious issue that affects the police themselves and the people the defunding is supposed to help “The police are the first responders to a broad range of public safety issues and serious crime. Crime will not end if we abolish or defund the police. If the police are defunded, there will be delayed response when people who are in need call 911, fewer police on the street in neighborhoods and communities…If we defund the police, those most affected will be the poor and the marginalized”. The defunding of the police which is meant to help the poor and marginalized will hurt them more than anyone. All of the criminals that the police take in and the public service they do will all go away and that will hurt society greatly.
This caused more crime to go unsolved which forced officers to work lengthy amounts of overtime (Weichselbaum and Lewis). Allowing this to continue will only cause more and more officers to quit because of the hard work they are putting in with very little pay to show. Working overtime is an extra role to take on if you need the money or have the time. Being forced to work should never be the case for any job, especially for the men and women that try their best to keep us and the people around us safe. Defunding the police and using that money for any other matter is and will always be the wrong choice.
In Law Enforcement and enforcing the law there is six areas in which police departments have been found to be defective or deficient. This is a very difficult topic for me to agree with because police officers are put in to very stressful and unknown circumstances on a daily bases. In many cases these scenarios require a decision to be made in a split second or it could be life or death. This split second decision has months and months to be twisted and picked apart by lawyers, jury, and mostly the media. Another reason police receive such attention is because it is their job to be in the view of the public at all times and today’s technology is making it even more difficult for them to effectively and efficiently do their jobs.
In addition to these notes, Hryniewicz has produced policy recommendations in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Violence & Victims, Society & Mental Health, Health Sociology Review, Contemporary Justice Review, and many more (“Danielle Hryniewicz” 1). On the other side of the debate, Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of Missouri-St. Louis, David A. Klinger, supports reform through the police force in his article, "Police Training As An Instrument Of Accountability," issued by the St. Louis University Public Law Review in 2012. Along with his specialization in policing, terrorism, and the use of deadly force, Klinger possesses the experience of a patrol officer for the Los Angeles and Redmond Police Departments ("David A. Klinger, Professor" 1). With Hyrniewicz’s perspective of police brutality as a social issue which can be prevented through civilian oversight, and Klinger’s belief that it is a psychological issue resolved by refining police training, the two authors also disagree on who should be responsible for the reform that reclaims police accountability and
Through the use of financial and administrative sanctions against police officers we can better deter illegal searches and seizures. If an officer makes an illegal search and seizure there can be a set fine that they would have to pay to the courts, the fine can adjust in value to match the severity in misconduct. Officers can face being removed from the case, suspension without pay, or even termination from their job depending on the severity of the violation. These alternatives provide real and motivating consequences to police officers and would act as a better deterrent than the exclusionary
After years of ungrounded criticism from the press and activists, after highly publicized litigation and the passage of ill-considered laws—such as the one making officers financially liable for alleged “racial profiling”—NYPD officers have radically scaled back their discretionary activity. Pedestrian stops have dropped 80 percent citywide and almost 100 percent in some areas. The department is grappling with how to induce officers to use their lawful authority again to stop crime before it happens. Garner’s death was a heartbreaking tragedy, but the unjustified backlash against misdemeanor enforcement is likely to result in more tragedy for New Yorkers” (36, Heather Mac Donald).” Here, Mac Donald makes me feel threatened by the criminal justice system.
Qualified immunity as it is in the United States has allowed for no consequences for police officers even if they keep repeatedly making the same “mistake.” A longer training period and better screening will allow for a more trustworthy police system. Crime prevention is another good reform. Crime prevention does not just mean arrest, jail time, and fines. It means researching the cause and taking steps to stop the cause from happening.
Abstract Police departments face increasing criticism from protesters, the media, and the federal government. Many negative personal encounters and officer-involved shootings have stimulated arguments about American law enforcement. These officer involved shootings have caused racial issues across the country. Is reform necessary?
Defunding the police is not a good idea for the public and everyone, from the consequences that will happen if it happens. Defunding the police will not grante safety or peace. Criminals will see the opportunity to do things they wanted to do more because the police won’t have much money to do things to stop them in time. In the article “Defunding police will not compromise public safety” it says “in 2018, for example, 4,135 people were charged with theft under $5,000, 3,345 were charged with shoplifting under $5,000, 996 were charged with fraud and 772 were charged with mischief”. This quote shows that crime will
We should defund the police departments and officers because we can use the extra budget for more effective things to help the community. Defunding police departments means to cut funds and stop providing a certain amount of money to one source. Defunding police would mean to take away money that they receive for their own benefits and salaries and use it to fund different places around cities and neighborhoods. Taking this money away from the police can be a good benefit to the community, we can use those funds to help support families in need, renovate parks or streets, the money can also go to helping schools with supplies or getting homeless people off the streets and somewhere safer. In other words, Defunding means to cut funds from going
There are many pros and cons when it comes to the use of police force. The use of force is strictly a part of the job requirement of protecting and serving our community. It is the everyday battles that force police to make decisions that may seem a bit harsh at times. The use of force is only acceptable under certain circumstances and should only be used when absolutely needed. There are cases when civilians are saved by the use of police force, and there are cases when innocent people are hurt or even killed by the use of police force.
Everyday Police officers are serving our nation, state, county, and city. Their duty is to help product and to provide a safe environment to the community. Often officer face dangerous scenarios and are at risk everyday. Depending on where an officer works, will usually determine how much he/she is paid and what they do on a daily basis. Well a question that often arises, should law enforcement officers be paid higher wages, because of what they do for the community?