Article Analysis
In my editorial, Ross Douthat criticizes President Donald Trump for his mistakes which alienate even some of his supporter base. Douthat focuses on two main problems Trump 's criticisms of Jeff Sessions and his mistakes in dealing with the Russia investigation.
The author is trying to convince the reader that Trump is not fit to be president given his periodic out lashes against those who anger him although it is mostly due to his seemingly unstable mindset.
The author uses pathos to emotionally draw in the reader by calling the president 's actions “an insanely stupid exercise”. This is because Donald Trump is a largely unpopular figure so attacking him in the first sentence would attract many readers who may not
…show more content…
5.1 In the first paragraph Douthat refers to Trump 's actions as “a multitiered tower of political idiocy”. What the reader is supposed to understand is multi means many and tiers mean levels so essentially one has to make the connection that Trump 's actions are basically idiotic on many levels. The author wants the reader to imagine how dumb the president 's actions are by describing them as a tower. 5.2 In the fifth paragraph Douthat refers to the problems plaguing Trumps administration as a “tower of folly”. Again Douthat is trying to say that there are many problems by saying that Trump 's poor decisions are as big as a tower. He does this to further show that there are more than a few problems getting in the way of Trump 's plans ironically Trump himself. 5.3 For the most part, most of the paragraphs are of an adequate length usually starting off with well-sized sentences. Douthat mostly uses the first sentence of every paragraph to use it as a metaphor for a level after which he proceeds to explain what the problems are in the said level. Thus the first sentence is usually a little shorter than the rest to open up the way for an explanation. 6. Douthat concludes the article by restating that Trump is not fit for office and implies that he should be impeached. Basically, he is asking people to impeach the president as soon as
In October of 2014, Bill Nye, of “Science Guy” fame, spoke at Lewis & Clark College as part of the Speaker Series sponsored by Campus Activities Board (CAB), President Glassner, and Dean Gonzalez. The advertisement for the events announced that Nye would “talk about his early history, the importance of science education, and “[inspire] others to change the world through it.” Expectations were incredibly high; Nye did not live up to them. His talk lacked a clear purpose and was hard to follow at points. Still, many students left the event reasonably satisfied with the talk.
An icy cold stare coming from a very influential individual would come across as an evil man making the wrong decision right? Richard Notkin creates an image of George W. Bush out of small tiles all put together in a piece called “All Nations Have Their Moments of Foolishness.” Originally I believed this image portrayed a connection to Bush’s decisions in Afghanistan and the horrific event of 9/11. These decisions then effected how he was viewed from society. Notkins article the “Artist Statement” analyzes the truthful meaning of the piece, which is truthfulness.
1. Author’s Primary Claim and Summary of Main Points: Recent hurricanes, such as Harvey and Irma, have caused much political unrest among the American people. • Hurricane Irma is one of 16 of the largest category 5 hurricanes that have hit the US • The author shows an astronaut in space looking at the hurricanes hitting Florida, and hurricane Harvey’s effect on Texas. • The phrase “Houston, you have a problem,” is a reference to the Apollo 13 expedition to the moon, where James Lovell called back to base and said “Houston, we have had a problem.”
There is no doubting when it comes to rhetoric that a strong emotional appeal by a credible influential figure is an incredibly effective rhetorical strategy. This is gloriously exemplified in Allison Grimes’ article, "'' Rigged' rhetoric wrong, destructive", wherein Mrs. Grimes asserts that Trumps questioning of the legitimacy of the current election cycle is dangerous, however, her usage of emotional appeal and appeal to authority underscores her failure to include logical appeal. Allison begins her article firmly, by stating "It's time to tell it like it is."
In addition, Wilson skillfully manufactures each group’s statements regarding their plans to seem ill-considered. By doing this, he shows how
Trump’s attack on China for unfair trade relates to Madison and Jefferson’s proposal of stopping trade. The accusations and comments Trump has made throughout the course of his campaign and now Presidency can be predicted to have a high possibility of coming true, but only time will tell if these proposals are finalized. The hopes and future of America has been affected and changed from time to time. The guidance and leadership of a President not only reflects the possibilities of the nation, but the citizens who carry the weight of the country’s prosperity. Therefore the people can only hope that Trump will lead with mindfulness and dignity of the
The author presents no real fact to the topic of Trump's victory, but merely speculates and implies his own outcomes based on how he feels about the candidate and the candidate's views. In continuation, the article published by The Christian Science Monitor showcases the other side of journalism. The author, Peter Grier, writes about the same topic as Mr. Harwood, yet he manages to convey the news to the reader without injecting much of his opinion. He states that Trump may win and then presents both
Lowry begins the column with exaggeration, stating that Trump crushed the board in New Hampshire, results presidential nominees usually receive. He moves on to insult the supporters of Trump saying he is being voted for due to their “lazy complacency”. Lowry places emphasis on Trumps current victories noting that the issue is not Trump fading out, it is him being stopped. He does this to show severity and point out the level of achievement Donald Trump has received. Trump is now true competition.
Over the past decades, America has been ruled by intelligent and ___ men. In my opinion, Donald Trump should not be elected as a president of United States of America because of his unfitting personalities as a president. There are evidences that show Donald Trump is incapable of leading and taking charge of a country. He has shown his disdain toward the environment, he has also been proven to be unintelligent and has no experience of being a politician, _____. First of all, Donald Trump shows very little respect to the environment.
His argument is noticeably confident and certain about his opinions on what predicaments the United States is facing due to the A.O.C. He maintains a consistent tone throughout the letter standing by his stated objections although in conclusion Hamilton does appear to ‘apologize’ for his intense mannerism and continues on to say, “You will perceive, my dear sir, this letter is hastily written and with a confidential freedom; not as to a member of Congress whose feelings may be sore at the prevailing clamors, but as to a friend who is in a situation to remedy public disorders. ”The letter positions clear justifications on why the A.O.C is defected and what steps need to be taken in order the remedy the problem. Hamilton organizes it in a way that identifies each drawback of the A.O.C and he assess it-- so that he is providing factual evidence to support his disputes with the system of
The effect of the parallelism in paragraph 14 is to show the different sides of the argument he shows in the paper. The first sentence shows how people “think with their party, not independently” (720). His main argument is presented in his first long sentence that everyone live in the midst of self-conformity. People are controlled by public opinions without really realizing it. The next sentence points out that “they are happy in their party’s approval” (720).
In this essay I will be talking about how Donald Trump shouldn 't be president. I think Donald Trump shouldn 't be president because he won 't let immigrates have health care and I don 't think that is right to do and he says that he is not going to do that because it cost them $10 billion and what if they have kids the kids won 't have health care and that is not right and who cares if that cost money they are people to. Another thing he is going to do if he is president is that he will increase pollution in the U.S and that is not good and because of pollution a lot of icy places are melting and it is going to get worst. Donald Trump is trying to get rid of North American Free Trade Agreement with the Canada and Mexico and that can’t be
Donald Trump Should Be Impeached Donald Trump is the 45th president of the United States however is not known to be a not a great president. Trump has said many ignorant and racist remarks, and has no regrets for anyone. Donald has not only offended America, but has offended various countries as well. Trump has been considered the worst president in history, therefore he should be impeached. (Thesis) Donald Trump has been called out for his ridiculous statements, overconfidence and prejudice beliefs.
Fallacies in political speeches: Donald Trump announces he is running for president. Donald Trump’s one very distinct “ability” is making a vast amount of people react to what he says. Be it good or bad, this makes him gain more attention not only in the United States, but all over the world. At the end of the day, what really matters is if his statements have, in fact, any effect on people’s votes. So for those who are not yet sure about his sincerity, it only takes a not to deep analysis of his speeches to spot serious fallacies.
In my paper, I will analyse Donald Trump’s political activities before and after the election to get an objective viewpoint of America’s President. We’ll start off with the history of Trump, both personal and political, to see whether there was some sort of significant development over the years indicating a tendency towards ‘good or evil’. Next, we will take a look at what Donald Trump promised to do – the wall, lowering taxes and repealing Obamacare to name a few – and evaluate if he managed to keep his election pledges. This success rate is a major factor in definitively assessing Trump’s influence on America.