Economic Differences Between Sectionalism And The Civil War

Faith Pasmore
JWags
PAPUSH
31 March 2023
Sectionalism and the Civil War
In modern times, arguments encountered revolve around controversial topics, political opinions, and personal issues. However, most conflicts encountered on the daily are small, easily resolved quarrels between family, friends, and neighbors. In the past, these conflicts have not always been so low-key. During the Civil War, it was brother against brother and neighbor against neighbor. People were so divided on issues like slavery, their diverse needs, and especially leaders for the country to the point where sectionalism swallowed the entire country and transformed it into two. Some of these conflicts are still existent and prominent today, like issues over presidential

The United States was divided into two sections: the North and the South. The differences between these two regions were so profound that they eventually led to conflict and war.

One key factor contributing to sectionalism was economic differences. The North was largely industrialized, while the South relied heavily on agriculture, particularly cotton production. This resulted in starkly different priorities for each region: the North prioritized tariffs and other policies that would protect their industries, while the South demanded free trade so that they could continue exporting their agricultural products. These different priorities created tension between the

The North felt increasingly marginalized by Southern politicians who held significant power in Congress due to their population advantage under the Three-Fifths Compromise. Additionally, disputes over state sovereignty versus federal authority further exacerbated political divisions between the regions.

Cultural differences also contributed to sectionalism. The North tended to be more urban and cosmopolitan, with diverse immigrant populations and greater levels of religious tolerance. Meanwhile, the South maintained traditional rural values rooted in white supremacy and conservative Christianity. These cultural differences made it difficult for citizens from each region to understand or empathize with one another.

Finally, geography itself played a role in creating regional divides. The Appalachian Mountains acted as a natural barrier separating the Northeastern states from Southern states such as Georgia and Alabama. This physical separation reinforced existing cultural and economic differences, making it difficult for the regions to come together as a united