The Native American tribes and the United States have a very long and devastating past. The english came from overseas and started taking the Natives land which they didn’t like. The Colonies did barter with some tribes, but fought for territory with most other tribes. The French even became allies with the Natives to try to defeat us in war. We befriended the Cherokee and a couple other dangerous tribes though in defence of their tactics. In the American war many of the Natives sided with the British to try and defeat the colonists and regain their lands. In this time western Pennsylvania and New York became savage battlegrounds. After the defeat of the British the newly set boundaries for America ensured that their would be more and more …show more content…
Stand Waite who was one of the tribe leaders chose to stay with the confederacy down to the last man. Colorado volunteers slaughtered over 200 Black Kettle Cheyennes even knowing the Cheyennes were willing to come to an agreement with the government. The Red River War was were the Natives were truly broken in 1874-1875. This war was were some of the major battles ensued. Just like the battle of Washita which was a very bloody battle that was more of a slaughter than a battle. They destroyed native food supplies, lodging and even killed the natives horses. Ranald Mackenzie's slaughter of over 1000 native american ponies was considered overkill and a waste of resources. The Sioux, Cheyenne, and even the Arapahos pushed the northerners out of the Dakotas, but the rumors of gold in North Dakota cause the whites expansion to explode to the Dakotas. This caused the natives to be forced out of their home or killed. Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull were among those in the battle of Little Bighorn in the …show more content…
New technological advantages often gave the whites the upper hand. Although the natives got their hands on repeating weapons such as the lever action. These technological advantages often backfired on the whites/calvary. The reason for this is because of native raids on transport carriages and supply routes. At this point in the mid 1880’s the native/American wars were basically over due to the calvary advantages. The calvary went on what some people called an extinction event and told all the tribes in America that they would either be sent to reservations or be killed. The bad thing of these battles and wars is that the number of noncombatants that were killed. There were more women and children that were killed on both sides than there were of actual combatants. This is sad because the women and children shouldn’t have been a part of this war yet they were in it more than the fighters
Ashlee Flaviani Professor Ball June 11, 2016 Hist 1302 Research paper rough draft : Sand Creek Massacre Sand Creek was a “small village of about 800 Cheyenne Indians along southeast Colorado” (ushistory.com), the struggle was violent as the need for native land grew more essential. The need for land became such a necessity that logical compromise was no longer an option. Native Americans grew progressively violent when territory became the main question. “By the end of the Civil War the two sides had slipped down a downward spiral of vicious battles until the 1890s” (ushistory.com).
In June of 1876, Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) George Armstrong Custer led the United States (US) 7th Cavalry Regiment into battle against a major Native American force. The US 7th Cavalry Regiment suffered a major defeat near the Little Bighorn River in the eastern Montana Territory (Wagner III, 2014). The purpose of this paper is to examine the prominent elements of the battle and to provide an alternate outcome. In theory, LTC Custer could have gained a decisive victory at Little Bighorn by utilizing surveillance and additional intelligence assets available at the time.
Because of the Treaty of Paris, Britain gained a substantial portion of American soil. Britain tried to discourage Americans from settling there because their resources were running low. Because French government had yielded this land to Britain, didn’t necessarily mean that the Ohio Valley’s French peoples would give up their rights to land or trade, readily. Spread out groups of French settlers made Britain scared of another long fight. The Native Americans, who were allied with the French, continued to battle after the peace had been obtained.
“Custer's Last Stand” was a victory for the Indian people, but as a result of their win, they brought a lot of attention to themselves which angered the American people. As a result, the US government treated the Native Americans more hostile, allowing John Gibbons to go and attack the Nez Perce Indians, didn’t follow through with their agreements dealing with land and took land away, and kept expanding westward while continuing to grow America East to West. Directly after new got out that the Indians had not only won the battle, but had slaughtered the American army, John Gibbons rounded up every available man and went after the Nez Perce Indians, whom he thought were the easiest and head of attack. Many innocent woman and children died on
The relationships between the three major settlers and the Native Americans differed in many ways. All the evidence needed is in the seven documents shown. Each of the documents provides insight to one of the three nationalities. It is fair to assume that the English were focused more on friendship, the Spanish set their eyes on the gold, and the French were insistent on converting the Native Americans to Christianity. Though they may have been cruel to their enemies, the natives were very kind and friendly towards the English colonizers, as stated in Document One.
On the 25th of June 1876 on the ‘greasy’ grass of Dakota the Battle of the Little Big Horn occurred. Sioux and Cheyenne Indians defiantly left their reservations, outraged over the continued intrusions of whites into their sacred lands in the Black Hills. They gathered in Montana with the great warrior Sitting Bull to fight for their lands. Determined to resist the efforts of the U.S Army to force them onto reservations, Indians under the leadership of Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse wipe out Lieutenant Colonel George Custer and much of his 7th Cavalry at the Battle of the Little Big Horn. This essay with try to determine why the U.S. Army lost this, every so important battle against the Sioux.
Intrusive Acts on Early North America The Chickasaw and Choctaw tribes were typically considered as enemies throughout most of the 17th and 18th centuries. Thrown into continuous, brutal warfare by their varying European allies, the two tribes shared something in common: the lives of their own tribes were continuously jeopardized by the settlement of the “new coming” Europeans. With all of the commotion caused by conflicting European powers, the Native Americans became endangered by warfare, were forced to adapt to European ways, and left to be dependent on their allies for supplies that kept their tribes alive. The intrusive and unfair ways of the settling colonists led to the downfall of the Natives that had lived on North American soil
After the Civil War ended many people were in hope of finding land since population was increasing. Since the West was underdeveloped and uncivilized, many decided to expand the land. First the Louisiana Purchase increased the opportunity of expansion. Then industrialization and the Homestead Act also caused many companies encouraged to move West due to the low cost of land and that the transportation was provided through the railroads. In order to complete such goals, something had to be done with the Natives since it conflicted with their home area.
While watching the film, “Cold Mountain” I noticed that there was a Native American soldier fighting with the Confederate troops. I was quite intrigued by this because I was not knowledgeable of Native Americans fighting alongside the Confederates. For this reason, I have decided to base my research paper around this and dive deeper and understand the background for this. According to the website, “Wikipedia”, Native Americans fought for both the Unions and the Confederates.
Throughout the seventeenth century, conflict between Europeans and Native Americans was rampant and constant. As more and more Europeans migrated to America, violence became increasingly consistent. This seemingly institutionalized pattern of conflict begs a question: Was conflict between Europeans and Native Americans inevitable? Kevin Kenny and Cynthia J. Van Zandt take opposing sides on the issue. Kevin Kenny asserts that William Penn’s vision for cordial relations with local Native Americans was destined for failure due to European colonists’ demands for privately owned land.
The actually battle that took place in the state was called the Sand Creek Massacre. This was however not really a battle but a massacre from the name. This massacre started with the Indians and the tension between the white settlers. Chivington wanting more attention used this to give an excuse to attack the supposedly protected Indians from attacks by the federal government. Chivington still attacked even when there was an American and a white flag hanging above the camp.
There were harsh conflicts between white explorers and Native Americans from the earliest starting point of European colonization of the New world, such viciousness expanded in the mid-nineteenth century as European pioneers moved ever advance west over the American mainland. Most white Americans accepted there was horrible quality of life in peace and agreement with Native Americans, the government made the reservation framework
Native Americans throughout history particularly have always been in numerous wars and battles with other countries and people around the world with the information historians have today. Before 1776, many Native Americans enter The Seven Years War in 1756, battles fought over large land which was for all intents won by Great Britain, which definitely is quite significant. The Seven Years War generally ended in 1763 but a year later, the Ottawa Chief Pontiac led many ruthless Native American warriors to battle the British. War in this time very constant and continuous. But Native Americans had very few relations with anyone around this time, showing how war in this time really was normal for them.
The Native Americans many times did not understand what the soldiers were doing, from this the Sioux became scared and fled. Furthermore, Reno’s battalion had coverage from the landscape which cause mass confusion, among both groups. From the eyes of George Henderson, the Native Americans truly never faltered; however, as it was mentioned they could not truly see the battalion. The one statement made from both sides was the Native Americans fled. Though no party considered the other weak, they both felt fear, both the battalion and the Native Americans became confused during this battle.
These tribes were more civilized then we are lead to believe. White Americans loathed the Indians because they were “undeserving” of the fertile land they had. White settlers wanted this land so bad they burned down house and towns, stole animals and lived in land that didn’t belong to them. They tormented the native Americans for decades and then the state governments started passing laws to strip the Indians of their rights.