It was a dark and windy night in the town of Rowlett, Texas. On June 6th, 1996, Darlie Routier and her sons Devon and Damon Routier were awaken by the tip of a knife. Although it may sound insane, this was all due to a mother who did not have the patience for the children and valued her appearance more. in the opinion of her friends (Montaldo,2015,1). In reality this woman was sentenced to death row because her whole case was faulty. The evidence in the Routier case was not provided properly and her attorney was not working in her favor. According to Charles Montaldo (2015), “The attorney that presented Darlie Routier, had a pre-arrangement with Darin Routier and other family members not to pursue any defense that could implicate darin” (para.) …show more content…
The Routier’s lived a lavish lifestyle for a while, until things with Darin’s business faltered and brought along financial problems, I guess you could say this would lead people to do some idiotic things like stage a robbery or break in right? Not ideally but “Darin Routier has admitted to trying to arrange an insurance scam, which included someone breaking into their home. He has admitted that he had begun the initial steps to arrange a break-in, but that it was to be done when no one was at home.” And let’s keep in mind that this admission was never presented in the presence of a jury. The jury also never saw detailed pictures of Darlie’s wounds they just know that the necklace she was wearing saved her life (LeTrent, 2015, 1). This gave the prosecutors something to run with, so they took that and persuaded the jury that Darlie caused self-inflicting wounds to herself, and killed her children causing the jury to find her guilty because they were not providing full and thorough evidence. Darlie Routier had no motive to kill her children and cause self-inflicting wounds to herself the way the prosecutors persuaded, but Darin on the other hand had $250, 00 of motive (LeTrent, 2015, 1). This provides sufficient suspicions towards Darin, because he admitted to planning an insurance scam, but of course this was not provided in court due to this pre-arrangement Darin had with the
Casey Anthony was one of the only things people could talk about in 2008. Casey Anthony blew the news up about the killing of her daughter, the case lasted for about three years before the court finally reached a non- guilty verdict. The media and people all around America continued to speculate on reasons why they thought the verdict should have been guilty. After examining the case, two theories connect to the case. Casey Anthony has allowed me to further explore and examine all the theories so that I could explain the reasoning behind Anthony’s actions.
Episode 7 of “Serial” is a defense compilation that incorporates new opinions into the case. The episode begins addressing Justin Wolfe’s case, which is similar to Adnan’s case since cell records were used as well. Wolfe’s friend, who was the killer, got a deal and turned against him in court. Due to the similarity, the narrator, Sarah Koenig, talks to Deirdre (a person involved in Wolfe’s case) about Adnan’s case. Deirdre had a lot of questions about Adnan’s case concerning various small details and people involved, like Jay.
The Case The disappearance of Caylee Anthony had developed into a case full of lies and unanswered questions when her mother, Casey Anthony, gave fabricated information to law enforcement authorities. Caylee Anthony was only two-years-old when she disappeared without a trace after spending a weekend at her grandparent’s home. She was last seen with their daughter Casey, and after a month of being unable to see their granddaughter, Casey’s mother Cindy, had reported to the emergency operator that Caylee was missing. The incident immediately became a priority as law enforcement authorities had set up search and rescue teams to locate the child.
Daniel Holtzclaw is an ex-Oklahoma City officer who is convicted of rape along with other several charges after he brutally abused many African American women over the course of six months. Daniel Holtzclaw was sentenced to 263 years in prison for the charges filed against him. Holtzclaw was convicted for 18 of 36 counts which included first-degree rape. Holtzclaw’s adamant lawyers tried to start a new trial by stating that there was not enough evidence but it was a lost cause although they did not want to accept it. There were several of Holtzclaw’s victims who obstinately spoke out about their abuse done by Holtzclaw himself.
Imagine that you are taking a brief walk at night with your dog or by yourself and suddenly feel suffocated. The next thing you know, you have become the next victim of a gruesome sexual attack. However, you could never tell your tale because, at the lowest point of this heinous ordeal, you realize that your rapist will now turn into your murderer. This is the case of the Hillside Strangler, a story of two cousins, Angelo Buono and Kenneth Bianchi, and the brutal crimes they were charged with.
Christopher Simmons was a seventeen year old juvenile from Missouri whom in 1993 along with two of his friends, Charles Benjamin and John Tessmer, planned to rob and murder Shirley Crook in her home (Roper v. Simmons, 2004). On the night the crime was to be committed, Tessmer pulled out of the plan, and Simmons and Benjamin would continue on as planned. The two broke into the Ms. Crook’s home, robbed her, tied her up, covered up her eyes, then drove her to a state park and threw her off a bridge. During the trial, evidence, videotaped reenactment and testimony outlining the premeditated plan, allowed for the jury to easily convict Simmons of the crime. Even though Simmons had no previous criminal record and was a minor at the time the crime was committed,
The results of the trial in Stamford was that Mercy Disborough was temporarily convicted of witchcraft while Goody Clawson was acquitted. The consequences for Mercy Disborough were that despite months and jail and continued peer accusation, she was acquitted. The consequences for the townspeople are blurrier, but it is evident that persistent hysteria was not one of them. The results of the trial in Stamford were largely reigned in from the massive hysteria and mass convictions associated with contemporary witch trials by the law.
In the early 1990’s the U.S. Supreme Court case Roper v. Simmons took place and at the same time cases that were similar were also being heard. This case involved the defendant Christopher Simmons, who commited the crime, and Donald P. Roper, the plaintiff, who was the superintendent of Potosi Correctional Center and was representing the state of Missouri. The case would never have happened if it wasn't for the actions of 17-year old Christopher Simmons of Missouri in 1993. Simmons and a couple of his friends concocted a plan to murder Shirley Crook for reasons unknown. Only Simmons and one of his two friends commited it burglarizing Crook’s residence, binding her up and then driving to a state park and throwing her full of life body off
He illustrates how media sensationalism around “killer moms” has influenced the unreasonable criminalization of poor, drug-addicted and mentally ill mothers. He also argues that the criminal justice system is unfair toward the mentally ill and disabled. He illustrates his argument with the stories of Herbert Richardson and Jimmy Dill, two mentally ill men that EJI unsuccessfully represented during late stages of their cases. Stevenson tells the stories of both men’s executions and the profound, heartbreaking impact that their deaths had on
Introduction This case study review is of the 1997 rape and murder of 16-year-old Sarah Hansen, perpetrated by a man named Robert Keith Woodall. The areas of this case that are identified in this review are: description of the crimes that took place, how the evidence led law enforcement officials to identify the Mr. Woodall as the killer, the rulings handed down by three separate levels of the US Court system, and how those courts came to the conclusion that the death penalty was the appropriate sentence for the crimes committed by Mr. Woodall. Lastly, this review identifies the impact that the decisions made by the US supreme Court had on the American justice system.
The concept of jury nullification is not one that is broadly known or spoken about in the discipline of law. This is because until more recent years the concept was considered a complex subject that garnered plenty of conversation and debate. To understand the controversy that surrounds this particular area of the law, a definition of jury nullification is in order. It is known that the jury’s role is to act as the unbiased and impartial voice of judgment during the proceedings of a court case.
When asked if number 12 form the Lineup was in the court she said yes (5) (McEween 2014). During a phase of the preliminary hearing on of the eye witness told the court the she could not identify her attacker proving that the case had no probale cause that could take it to trial. The conducted of the eye witiness in the parelminary hearing proved beonyed any douth that there were serious issues when indentifing the man that was behind the crimes. Many of the witness gave statments that did not add up thus proving that there were serious isuues in to the authantcity of the statments by the eye witness. The goal of the Peleminery herring was to determin wether or not there was probale cause and looking at the statments given by the eye witness there was no probale
“Somebody killed my parents!” : the words that would begin one of America’s most recognized, historical, and notorious murder cases. A case that would bring death, imprisonment, and captivate millions of Americans. A case that proves to us that not only should one never judge a book by it’s cover, but also that sometimes even the most powerful are brought to justice. To many outsiders, Jose Menendez proved to be hard-working, civil, and a devoted husband and father.
For the past two decades, “The Innocence Project” with the help of updated science methods have worked relentlessly to get innocent people out of prison. Through DNA testing, they have been able to find new evidence that have freed hundreds of prisoners who were wrongfully convicted. Other factors such as eyewitness misidentification, false confessions, government misconduct, and inadequate defense also played keys roles in the wrongful convictions. The case that I would I would like to highlight today is that of, Johnnie Lindsey. Johnnie Lindsey was a 30-year old laundry worker who was falsely accused of rape.
On August 18, 1992, police were invited to a burning home in Somerville, Texas, where they found the bodies of 45-year-old Bobbie Davis, her 16-year-old daughter, and her four grandchildren, ages 4 to 9. Davis and the grandchildren had been stabbed, beaten and strangled. Davis’s daughter, Nicole, had been fatally shot. A few days later, police arrested Robert Carter, 26, the father of one of the grandchildren, after they noticed he had burns and bandages at the children’s funeral.