people are in pain. In the text this is shown when it says “he saw the lean figure of General Zaroff just ahead of him Rainsford made out another figure.. It was the giant Ivan. General Zaroff was still on his but Ivan was not” (pg.53). This shows General Zaroff is selfish because he made I van go first which had killed him. Zaroff and Rainsford may both be dangerous but the fact that Zaroff is selfish and careless makes him a completely different kind of person. At the end of the story the story Rainsford and General Zaroff are different people. In the story “The Most Dangerous Game” the characters Rainsford and General Zaroff are not similar. General Zaroff is more dangerous and does not care about others as much as he cares for himself. Rainsford Is Rainsford and General Zaroffs personality so different? The Most Dangerous Game is about a man named Rainsford who falls into the Caribbean Sea and meets a man named General Zaroff. In this story …show more content…
General Zaroff is similar to Rainsford because they are both dangerous and Zaroff show this in the story because he followed the hard traps. This is seen in the story when it says, “following the trail with sureness of a bloodhound came General Zaroff (pg.54). This shows General Zaroff is dangerous because he followed dangerous traps. Howeever, Zaroff is different from Rainsford because he is carless which he shows when he hunts humans. An example of this is seen in the story, which states “I had to invent a new animal…It must have courage, cunning, and above all it must be able to reason” (pg.48&49). This shows he’s carless because now he’s huntin humans imstead of animals and animals can’t reason. Zaroff is also different since he can be described as selfish because he does not care if is a character who would put himself in danger to save
“The Most Dangerous Game” Contrast paper The most dangerous game by Richard Connell states that there was a guy named General Zaroff who believed in hunting humans. Also there was a man named richard who was a book writer and they both had different opinions. But what the General didn 't know was that rainsford was that was very very smart.and that the book and the movie had two different sides to the story. There is a movie and and a book and the book and the movie are very different. In the movie some people will say that rainsford was dumb founded because when general Zaroff was about to hunt them rainsford
Since Zaroff is hunting humans, one of them is most likely to die. Murder can not go unpunished. Rainsford would most likely have died if he didn’t kill Zaroff. Some may say that one should never kill no matter what. Well, if Rainsford himself never killed Zaroff, he would have died.
General Zaroff was born a Cossack and was known for their savagery. General Zaroff got bored with just hunting animals he wanted some great to kill- humans. Rainsford found out and refused to hunt with him, so General Zaroff decided to hunt Rainsford. Rainsford outsmarted him and had a fight to the death which Rainsford won. But you got to ask yourself.
I wanted the ideal animal to hunt” (34). This statement highlights Zaroff’s predatory nature, as he views humans as nothing more than animals to be hunted for
The reason for this is simple, the Most Dangerous Game is a story about Rainsford becoming what General Zaroff already is, a murderer. It can be inferred that General Zaroff was most likely very similar to Rainsford before he
“The Most Dangerous Game” is a short story written by Richard Connel. In the story, Sanger Rainsford falls off his yacht and is forced to swim to Ship Trap Island. There he meets general Zaroff, who challenges him to a man versus man hunt and Rainsford wins. In the story, Connel was trying to show the value of human life. The author was trying to show this because he wanted to show the value of human life, and to show how opinions can change.
“The Most ddangerous ggame” portrays how civilized people will turn uncivilized If their in life depends on it. “The Most Dangerous Game” was written by Richard Connell. In this essay you will learn about a character named General Zaroff. General Zaroff is bBold, tTalented and aArrogant. Zaroff is a not very gentle with others.
In the story General Zaroff says,”Some he makes kings, some beggars. Me, He made a hunter” (Connell Pg. 223). This quote shows that General Zaroff is definitely a hunter, he has been a hunter for his whole life. Also in the story it shows that Rainsford is a major and famous hunter. General Zaroff mentions how he read Rainsfords books on hunting the Snow Leopard.
The books that are being compared and contrasted are both about The Civil War and what these soldiers went through. Each book has a few differences that separate them. The books are based on the same time period so they are going to have a lot in common. The books describe what both characters had to go through during the war. The differences in the book will show you how each soldier went through the war differently and the similarity’s will show you how it was for most of the soldiers in the Civil War.
“I am strong, I hunt the scum of the earth”(17). He only kills them because he wants to hunt something that can reason, something that can change its mind when faced with a life or death situation. “But they are men,” said Rainsford hotly. “Precisely,” said the general”(17). Zaroff is an apex hunter, and he demands the ultimate prey.
Throughout this journal, Zaroff can be characterized as confident and wacky. First, he can be considered as a confident man. In addition, the introduction of himself to Rainsford can be a detail by his speaking tone. Also, how he collaborates with Rainsford such as shake hands is a detail too. For example, “Another man was coming down the broad marble steps, an erect, slender man in evening clothes.
The largest difference between the two men is their degree of attachment to hunting. Zaroff sees it as the only thing worth pursuing and disregards things like morality to ensure that he gets the most out of his hobby. Another difference is their civility. At first glance it may seem that they are both equally cultured and polite however it is later revealed the Zaroff is very different to Rainsfords in this regard. He even goes as far to call himself and other humans inherently savage and fails to see the difference between animals and humans.
Rainsford is justified in killing General Zaroff because Zaroff wanted to
Short Story Character Analysis Essay Character traits of Zaroff in Richard Connell’s The Most Dangerous Game Thesis: (arrogance/cockiness, skillful, insanity): The character General Zaroff, the disturbed antagonist from The Most Dangerous Game, portrays prominent traits including arrogance/cockiness, skillful, and insanity. The complex character seems like just an extreme hunter but figure out a horrifying fact, that he clearly is proud of, and doesn’t regret pursuing. General zaroff redefines hunting when he restocks his island with a new type of life.
but it is General Zaroff that surpasses him. The part of the story when Rainsford asks if Ivan is Russian.... The reader now knows General Zaroff is not a mere hunter but he is out to