Gerard Jones states in his article “Violent Media Is Good For Kids” that violence in media has more of a positive effect on one, than negative. The writer's purpose for making this statement was because he believes that violent exposure can give one courage and help boost confidence. The writer supported his argument with some solid facts and great opinions. There is a problem with his thesis because violence can indeed affect children very negatively. The author had some solid facts about his son, he mentioned that when his son was in first grade he showed fear. “In first grade, his friends started climbing a tree at school. But he was afraid: of falling, of the centipedes crawling on the trunk, of sharp branches, of his friends’ decision. I took my cue from his own fantasies and read him old Tarzan comics, rich in combat and bright with flashing knives. For two weeks he lived in them.” he states that his son developed courage through a fantasy character. This character presents violence by hunting and killing wild animals such as the jaguar with homemade weapons. Another fact that supports the author's thesis, is when Gerard wrote some cartoons that contained violence. When he reached to contact the readers he discovered that his stories helped pull them out of emotional traps such as …show more content…
Since media has increased the amount of violence shown, the rate of school shootings and threats have dramatically increased. This was presented in the author's text, but then rebuttled with the quote, “Fear, greed, power-hungry, rage: these are aspects of ourselves that we try not to experience in our lives but often want, even need, to experience vicariously through stories of others”, by Melanie Moore, Ph.D. This statement is flawed, because although humans feel these aspects, being exposed to violence enhances the feelings, and also makes one feel like those aspects are
In his essay, “A Pedagogical Response to The Aurora Shootings” (235) Henry Jenkins analyzes shocking events involving public shootings in society. His main objective is to discuss why violence is a prominent factor in our popular culture and how the media inflames the issue. Jenkins does pose his belief that violence should be critically debated in order to research the main cause of violence within people. He also states that people must step out of the “media effects” assumption of violence and expands the scale to the meaning of what violence represents in movies and books. Jenkin states, “To be extra clear, I do not think media is where this debate should be focused” (236).
In Gerard Jones’ essay “Violent Media is Food for Kids,” he forces the reader to decide whether the argument that there is a direct correlation between violent media and violent children is valid, or if that by denying children the freedom to experience violence through media, society is harming a very important foundation of finding one’s self. I find it similar to the Jude Priest case because two parents banded together to sue a band for allegedly putting subliminal messages in their heavy metal music that caused their sons to commit suicide. While most of the expert witness concluded that there was not enough scientific research to prove that subliminal messages can truly influence someone, nor can Vance or Belknap could really be considered
To analyze this piece we should look at the title of the piece: “Violent media is good for kids”. This headline catches the eye because it gives an unexpected answer to something people have heard for many decades now. Most articles that talk about violent media are usually against them and have a way to persuade the audience in why they shouldn’t expose their kids to video games like Call of Duty or Halo. However in this article, just by looking at the title the
Today’s society is also experiencing savage behavior that is directly connected to violent media. The Sandy Hook gunman, Adam Lanza, had a collection of violent video games, including Call of Duty; a graphic first-person shooter. Violence like this can be seen when Montag burns Captain Beatty, “And then he was a shrieking blaze, a jumping, sprawling gibbering manikin . . . a writhing flame on the lawn as Montag shot one continuous pulse of liquid fire on him” (113). It is exposure to malicious media that has led them to accept violence as a quick way to fix their problems.
Lord of the Flies Essay Revision In the book, Lord of the Flies by WIlliam Golding, a group of young boys are stranded on an island all alone, which turns to have a horrible outcome- murder and savagery. Golding uses a variety of symbols to paint the picture of little boys turning savage, one symbol being ¨the beast¨. Throughout the use of the beast as a symbol of fear, as seen when the boy´s find a dead parachuter and confuse it with the beast, Golding suggests that every human has a beast in them, and humans are the only thing that should be feared. From the start, it was clear to see how rapidly the boys were starting to turn into savages on account of their fear of the beast. Piggy and Simon were the first to figure the puzzle out on page 84, during an assembly to discuss about the beast.
In the article, Violent Media is Good for Kids, the author makes the point of violent media help kids to express their feelings. He offers an example of his son who was afraid of climbing a tree due to fear. To help his son with his fear he read him the Tarzan comics. He also tell a story about a mid-age girl, who he worked with before. She had multiple family problems and listened to rap to explore her feeling.
The book “Rampage The Social Roots Of School Shootings” written by Newman et al, offers many different views and theories behind the issues of Rampage school shootings. In this paper I will give the reader an in depth overview and evaluation of the aforementioned book. Offering researched based reasons to why these school shootings actually happen. They explore the communities of Heath and Westside, the grounds of two horrific acts of rampage shootings by Michael Carnell, Andrew Golden and Mitchell Johnson. They explain various angles of there research such as identifying an issue, how signals given by children can be misinterpreted, the effects of social capital and how mental factors play a role in the acts of the shooters.
In this book by the name of “whale talk” was a typical underdog story, but at the same time it had a small touch of a hero story all wrapped in one. We meet TJ an adopted and troubled young teenager with a good trait of fighting for what he believes in even if his parents and society isn 't completely okay with the use of physical violence. At a young age the boy was neglected by an addicted and neglective mother, he always had a certain rage in him. When he was just three years of age, he had to go to a therapist for children taken from abusive homes that don’t know exactly how to deal with their feelings or extreme outbursts, TJ had very bad outbursts of physical anger over the smallest of things, after years of therapy he got over it,
In the passage “Violent Media Is Good For Kids” written by Gerard Jones, Jones claims that violence through comics, toys, and the media helps kids to cope with everyday issues. The reason Jones feels this way is because as a child he was taught that violence was ba,d and he did not have a very good experience with coping with his fears. Jones argues that the Hulk helped him through tough times, that his own son using characters to overcome obstacles, and how violence can avoid some negative feelings. In the beginning of the passage, Jones talks about how he was told to stay away from violence as a child, which at first did not help him till he met the hulk.
In a fair amount of school shootings, the shooters have been known to spend a large amount of time on social media or video games (Lyons). Another article, “The Future of Children”, written by Craig A. Anderson and Soledad Liliana Escobar-Chaves, agrees with the majority of claims Lyons makes. “Despite many reports that exposure to violent media is a causal risk factor, the U.S. public remains largely unaware of these risks, and youth exposure to violent media remains extremely high” (Anderson). Lyons also claims that there is no individual type of media that proves to make a viewer more violent, which the other article also agrees with. “Furthermore, it is likely that overall media violence exposure has a somewhat larger effect than any individual type of media violence”
In conclusion, the commodity “Violence is Good for Kids” by Gerald Jones is a abundantly ambiguous section of autograph that breaches the civic norms and ethical living. There is no absolute affirmation that can actuate any sane apperception to chase that route. Using his own acquaintance abandoned is a affirmation that the cessation which the columnist accomplished emanated from a abject of ability insufficiency. Marvel Comics cannot be the alone anatomy of agitated media. There are abounding others, which accept awful adverse effects; the little absorbing aspect should not abash anyone to authority such a able attack in their favor.
Children become insensitive to others sufferings. Their values, attitudes and behaviour may change after watching violent shows. As it has a global influence, to avoid this, the following courses of action can be taken: • Make them watch value and learning based animated cartoons that talk about "Good touch, bad touch," for example. • Team children together so they learn to be cooperative and open minded.
Violence in media is toxic to young adolescents and children and should be apprehended and should not recur in the future. Media violence is a very bad thing that we have popularized as a generation and made it look funny or good, and that is not the case. we should stop popularizing media violence and we should find ways to weed it out of our media and everything else. The fact is that media violence is bad and an evil thing that should not be gratified. it makes adolescents think that violence is okay and will make them happier it also makes them think it should be used but in reality it makes them more unhappy and should never be used.
Media violence has become a controversial topic in the world today. Owing to the rising technology, children are beginning to show increasing violent behaviors. The debates on the effects of media ranging from screen media, video games, and books have a long history. Due to this, there is a speculation over what is the leading cause of the increasing violence in children. Some people argue that there is a relationship between media violence and real-life violence.
Television is the platform where most people consume media. As a result, many television viewers are frequently exposed to violence. A large portion of the violent media displayed on television is made up of realistic content such as the news and documentaries, accompanied by fictional television series and movies. Since, violent content is constantly being displayed, it is only a matter of time before some of the viewers are affected by the high quantity of exposure. Although, a more important issue could be connected to the age of the viewer rather than just the quantity.