Demand Action for gun sense in Moms America mobilizes moms and families to advocate stronger gun laws. This organization is built for families who want gun violence to come to an end. This public service announcement (see Figure 1) takes place in a classroom. This PSA is clearly stating the past incidents involving school shootings. This PSA was published after all the school shootings that have happened. In this online public service announcement, there is a young boy and girl. The boy who is wearing a red shirt making an allusion to blood is holding an unimportant chocolate egg which has been banned from the United States due to nutritional factors. The young girl is wearing a white and purple stripped shirt is brandishing an intimidating …show more content…
The color scheme in this PSA delivers emotions that touch anyone who sees it. The PSA has a variety of shades of reds. Those shades make the allusion to blood and make the audience feel sympathetic towards the kids involved in gun violence situations. In this case school shootings. There is also the darkness of the room there is also shades of grey in there that brings up the controversy in gun violence. The whole situation has not been resolved, nobody can come to an agreement when it comes to gun violence so the shade of grey makes the resemblance to the disagreement of the situation. All the emotions that the PSA is portraying are very persuasive towards parents around the country for the reason that it makes them want the best for their children. Parents around the country want to make sure their children are in a safe environment so they could acquire their education and succeed in life. This PSA is great to persuade parents to vote against guns so they make the community safer for their children. Another emotion the PSA portrays is sympathy. If someone sees the PSA they will first see the faces of both the children. They display a very cold and hard expression on their face and by just looking at their face people with feel sympathetic towards the children. Everyone expects children to have immense smiles on their faces filled with joy and playfulness. And when they see these faces it makes people think that this is a serious
When is it Going to Change? Nothing will change, many mass shootings have occurred in our nation’s history. One, author, Steve Israel wrote in his argument article “Nothing Will Change After the Las Vegas Shooting.” This was published after a recent mass shooting in October of 2017 in the New York Times.
Guns need to be controlled. From the mass shooting in Newton, Connecticut that killed twenty-seven people, twenty of whom were faultless children at Sandy Hook Elementary, to nine people gunned down during Bible study in Charleston, South Carolina at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church, guns have proven to be an extreme political problem. In 2011, former Arizona congresswoman, Gabrielle Giffords became a victim of gun violence, along with eighteen other guiltless people. She was shot at point blank range in the head while campaigning outside of a Safeway franchise in suburban Tucson, Arizona. Lucky enough to have a second chance at life, Giffords found the motivation to tackle the law of purchasing and owning a gun.
Sandy Banks is bothered by the injustice of police officers towards possible innocent victims. Because it seems like if officers rely on shooting at people as their safest option, Banks demands better training to help solve this issue. Police officers being caught on camera doesn 't changes the fact that the victim will become wounded, or pass away, yet, in most cases officers are not held accountable for the insensible act. In her article, "Horrific videos aren 't solving police shootings, but better training might" Banks asks for better training for police officers, as she developed strong pathos with details, great logos with logical solutions and consequences, but a weak ethos by not mentioning her credentials and the other side of the story.
Persuading the Public on Increasing Gun Control The article Who the N.R.A. Really Speaks For is written by Alan Berlow who has had writing appear in Harper’s and Atlantic Monthly, and is the author of Dead Season: A Story of Murder and Revenge. The target audience for this article is people who have more liberal views that have the ability to change the way the N.R.A. functions. This article was published in The New York Times soon after the shooting at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Oregon with the purpose of saying that the N.R.A. is not the voice of the public, or safety, but is currently the voice of criminals. The author’s stance on the issue is that gun owner’s views are not being represented properly by the N.R.A., and that gun
Jack Hunter’s “How Gun Control Kills” takes a more logical stance on the current issue of gun control. However, Hunter starts off using pathos, an appeal to emotion, and ethos, appealing to ethics. “Is there an evil worse than killing children?” Hunter asks in the opening paragraph. “Is there anything more heart-wrenching than the feeling of absolute helplessness in our inability to protect them?”
For many years, there has been a lot of controversy centering on the rate at which crime and violence is happening in society. Steven Pinker, the author of “Violence Vanquished” states, “We believe our world is riddled with terror and war, but we may be living in the most peaceable era in the human existence.” This quote from the article proves to many people that our world isn’t as bad as it is made out to be. In the article “Violence Vanquished” Pinker uses Logos, and an argument of fact to support the article 's central message which stands to prove violence is at an all-time low in today’s society.
Jack Reacher is set in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and follows the storyline of the 9th book in the Jack Reacher series by Lee Child called One Shot. Reacher, played by Tom Cruise, is a drifter, of sorts. A retired and decorated war veteran with 13 years of service under his belt, Reacher left the Army to go on a walkabout of sorts in order to experience the America that he had spent his life defending. He has no house, car, phone, or desire to spend more than a week or two in any location. He travels by bus and uses cash.
“Our Blind Spot about Guns” Rhetorical Analysis Essay American Journalist, Nicholas Kristof, in his essay, “Our Blind Spot about Guns”, addresses that if only guns were regulated and controlled like cars, there would be less fatalities. Kristof’s purpose is to emphasize how much safer cars are now than in the past, while guns do not have the same precautions. He constructs a compelling tone in order to convince the reader that the government should take more control on the safety of guns and who purchases them. Kristof builds credibility by successfully exerting emotional appeals on the audience, citing plausible statistics, and discussing what could possibly be done to prevent gun fatalities. Kristof begins his essay by discussing how automobile
Guns don’t kill people. People kill people. Many believe this, but columnist Nicholas Kristof, author of “Our Blind Spot about Guns,” published in 2014 in the New York Times, disagrees. A rhetorical analysis should consist of: logos, pathos, and ethos. Kristof’s use of logos is strong due to the amount of facts and statistics he offers to his audience, but he fails to strongly use pathos and ethos, due to the lack of these elements Kristof’s argument is weakened.
I believe that the main point of the Parkland school shooting video was to show the audience that guns were bad for our community and to show all the damage that one person with a gun can do to a bunch of people. The intended audience for this video would be the general public and maybe even those who collect or frequently use guns. The clip used pathos in two different ways to influence the intended audience's opinion. The first way that pathos was used was that the clip played on fear. The whole situation of the school shooting was terrifying, both for the students and everyone hearing about it.
Gun Violence In America Gun violence in america accounted for 33,636 deaths in 2015 alone and that number is only rising. If every american was able to obtain a firearm imagine what the numbers of gun related deaths. Even gun related injuries caused many more hospital visits in america what many other common incidents. That is why america needs to implement tighter gun laws to reduce the amount of gun violence in America. Without this we will continue to see shooting, gun death, gun injuries resulting in more and more gun related violence.
For example, it has an emotional feel by showing a woman with her baby and the word “KILLED” tragically written in red letters across it. As a mother myself and all the mothers out there this PSA has done its job by pulling on one’s heartstrings. The audience experiences not only sadness but anger as well. Sadness because you feel for the baby and the family left behind, and anger because this tragedy could have been prevented. Anyone with a family or loved one can view this picture and become emotional thinking about leaving a loved one behind.
The issue of gun control is a controversial debate that produces a variety of extreme arguments. However, when attacking the issue with the focus on child safety, the argument becomes more relatable and concerning. Moms Demand Action preaches the outlaw of guns and while that stance may seem too severe, the focus on children brings an ethical side to the argument that hits home to most Americans. The compelling stance on gun control produced by the advertisement is formed from the organizations tactics of using modes of communication that attract the viewer and forces reflection.
Moms Demand Action is known all over America, with chapters in all 50 states. Partnered with the group called Mayors Against Illegal Guns, they were able to unite millions of Americans to come together and make a difference at the local, state, and national levels. The audience can conclude that through this powerful image, Mom’s Demand Action is a group that is eager for change. People that believe gun control is not needed will not agree with this image. They may argue that education about gun safety is needed rather than rules that limit gun ownership.
According to Nassar & Zien (2012) who analyzed the effects of TV ads on children in the middle east, “children pay more attention to what they see rather than to what they only hear” (p.268). Hence, fast food advertisers take this opportunity to their advantage by designing advertisements with many visual triggers along with a nice food packaging and a great displaying of the product. A study about the effects of food ads on children and parents found that the majority of children in a sample size of 75 favored to have the unhealthy advertised food item they saw on TV than a