Financial Analysis The Home Depot has consistently produced excellent financial numbers, especially over the past few years. These results solidify them as the leader in the industry. Strong financials and pure size of the company are two contributing factors to success. As importantly, statistical analysis show The Home Depot to be an extremely well managed corporation. Total sales from Q3 2016 totaled $22.15 billion, an increase of 6.1% from the year prior. The Home Depot’s last reported earnings were $5.46/share. This number is very attractive to investors as it shows that the company is highly profitable. There price/earning ratio sits somewhere around industry average at 22.10. Investors are confident enough in future growth that they …show more content…
The Home Depot has paid a dividend each quarter since the 1990’s, raising dividends on every fourth occasion. They even continued to roll out dividends during the financial crisis in 2008 and 2009. For a company so dependent on the housing market this is extremely impressive, and speaks volumes about financial strength. Management currently promises on returning 50% of earning each year through quarterly dividends. They are also committed to reducing share count. Over the past ten years, total number of outstanding shares has dropped 40%. The company is very committed to investing money back into own stock thus increasing share price and …show more content…
However with few exceptions, The Home Depot outperforms Lowe’s considerably. Lowe’s did outperform The Home Depot in revenue growth this most recent quarter, but this is just a snapshot when in reality both The Home Depot and Lowe’s have been experiencing very similar growth for years. Next is Earnings/Share, The Home Depot is earns over two times more than Lowe’s for one dollar of share price. Key differences can be found in profit margins, debt vs equity, and return on equity. The Home Depot has a considerably higher profit margin when compared to the margin of Lowe’s, and is much better at turning invested capital into equity. Debt - Equity ratio was included to show that both companies are financed with a large portion of debt, yet remain
Annual Reports and Press releases The annual reports and press releases of both companies slightly differ though with a portion of similarity. Although, Home Depot’s annual report is composed at the headquarters of giving an inclusive report on all of the retail stores in the world, through the company’s website these reports posted can be found. Therefore, this being impartial and all-inclusive to an extent of analysis it would have to be done on the contrasts, similarities, profitability, and performance of different retail stores in different regions or countries. However, the shareholders and customers analyze the summary provided to know the general performance.
In this case, we can say that Amazon performance is a lot better than CanGo. A high Debt to Equity Ratio generally means that a company has been aggressive in financing its growth with debt. Debt can come in the form of stocks, bonds, and loans that the company borrowed against. Amazon current ratio is 1.31, but CanGo current ratio is 5.33. In general we can see that CanGo is performing better in this area compared with their main competitor Amazon, because this ratio shows that CanGo is capable of repaying its debts and liabilities than
If the weather isn’t right for that month and there are more sellers than there are buyers than the stock market for the corporation declines. But for Verizon everyone now a days has a cell phone or tablets or some sort of electronic and when an upgrade comes in most people buy it, so they are not as hard to predict if it is a good stock to invest in or not. Also for Verizon everyone pays for a phone bill each month, or has a bill to pay each month for service on their device so there is always income for that corporation. Verizon may cost a little more but in the long run I think it would be a better choice to invest in than Dicks Sporting
279). Lowes entire business is about creativity right down from the products all the way to the customers. Why not use it as core in large retailer/stores management? That’s exactly what Lowes imposes and uses. “If Americans continue to pay more attention to the aesthetic quotient of their homes, and this is a possibility as the proportion of home owners increase, Lowe’s could be a bigger beneficiary” (Forbes). This statement is clearly pointing out that as customers pay more attention to their own creativity they will turn to Lowes.
To compensate for these losses, they became successful with their online sales and shipping to homes. Once they got on the same path as their competitors, they have reigned supreme with more profits than ever
Management has shown their abilities over the years to weather the recent EPA changes and declining wood stove market. While their profit margin for return on assets decreased, they managed to still increase sales enough in their niche market to increase their asset turnover and in the end, increase their return on assets. Even with major deficits in their retained earnings, the company worked through the tough regulations and low cash flow to not only continually grow their business, but turn
Chipotle develops and operates fast-casual Mexican food restaurants. Chipotle’s menu is focused on burritos, tacos, burrito bowls, and salads, made with fresh ingredients. Chipotle has a commitment to “ Food with Integrity”. Chipotle began to use organically grown local products, dairy and meats from animals that were raised with high standards. Chipotle works very closely with their suppliers “Food with Integrity” speaks to the emerging demographic base.
The Target Corporation is one of the most recognizable brands on the market today and has seen significant growth since 1962, becoming the second largest retailer in the world (Cathcart, 2016). In this paper, I will discuss how the Target Corporation was able to achieve this growth by focusing on its review process by the Capital Expenditure Committee (CEC) and the five projects that are currently under review and rank them from one to five based on which project add the most shareholder value.
These include: 1) What they are passionate about 2) What they are the best in the world at: Productivity Authority 3) What drives their economic engine: Productivity and efficiency driven by effective capital allocation. The Home Depot expects sales to increase approximately 6.3 percent for the year 2017. The company also expects fiscal 2017 earnings per share to grow approximately 14 percent. For fiscal 2020,
In the last four weeks’ native earnings are clear reflecting Vera Bradley organization is weak. Vera Bradley stocks price of drop 22.6% in the last month. My conclusion is Vera Bradley need to expand domestically, penetrate an Asian Pacific region and rebrand using marketing strong efforts. The path Vera Bradley is on will lead to bankruptcy.
Dillard’s has a better earnings per share, yet again this is reflective of corporate strategy rather than reality. Dillard’s decision to buyback most of its shares has grossly diminished its shares outstanding which creates a higher EPS. Dillard’s also made the decision not to issue high dividends to shareholders and this is reflected in their DPS which is about one sixth of Nordstrom’s. Not only do the ratios show that Nordstrom is better at issuing dividends, they also show Nordstrom’s ability to create value in the market. Dillard’s buyback strategy has created a scenario in which their shares market value and book value barely differ.
Some of the major differences I see between the two companies is total liabilities and net profit. Total liabilities for Home Depot is more than that of Lowes by $10,000 or more every year from 2012 to 2016. Which is a 17% difference. Normally one might assume that this is a bad thing, but there could be a good reason why their total liabilities is much greater than Lowes. One reason might be that Home Depot is borrowing more money to upgrade their business where has Lowes isn’t doing that.
And company doing a great job. For the past 20 years The Home Depot has led the industry. The company made a lot of investment last year to upgrade the technological equipment for employees and consumer needs. Home Depot also made a big accent on green energy. By reducing the pollution and saving the energy at factories and the stores.
Cost of equity was calculated using the 10 year UST rate, 5.02%, because it is a good measurement of the risk free rate, plus the firm’s beta, 0.56, multiplied by the risk premium, which we concluded to be 5%. This gave Blaine, when unlevered, a WACC of 7.82%. When taking the $40 million debt and $100 million cash buyout of stocks into account, cost of debt is now a factor. Cost of debt was 5.88%, the bond rating of a AAA rated company like we assume Blaine
When calculating the profit margin ratio of both companies, I used both gross profit and sales from EX.4 and EX.5. Following the calculation of these factors, we can conclude that Home Depot has a profit margin ratio of 0.32, and the company Lowe’s has a profit margin ratio of 0.29. Home Depot’s profit margin ratio of 0.32 means that the company has a profit margin of 32%, indicating that 32 cents of profit are generated for every dollar of revenue. This suggests that the company is efficient in controlling its costs and generating profits. On the other hand, a profit margin ratio of 0.29 means that the company has a profit margin of 29%, indicating that 29 cents of profit are generated for every dollar of revenue.