When comparing two brilliant speeches that are presented in the Tragedy of Julius Caesar it is incredibly hard to pick which one I m a fan of. But that is only because of the dramatic irony that foreshadows the play for me. So expecting that you either have read this magnificent play or you haven't, you can decipher for yourself which one you choose to support. Both have their points in common but both have so many differences that it can make it confusing on which one is better. Before Brutus began his speech he said "Cassius go into the other streets and part the numbers. Those that will hear me speak, let 'em stay here; those that will follow Cassius, go with him;..." (Act 3.2) We can clearly see here that he is appealing to Ethos here by wanting the crowd of citizens to chose who they will …show more content…
He first starts out by saying "You gentle Romans-". (Act 3.2) He wants to come off friendly and kind so that he can have their attention. He says later on in his speech "I speak not to disapprove what Brutus spoke, but I am here to speak what I do know. You all did love him once, not without cause. What cause withholds you then to mourn for him? O judgment, thou art fled to brutish beasts, and men have lost their reason! Bear with me, my heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I most pause till it come back to me." (Act 3.2) Mark Antony's argument is very well crafted. He uses rhetoric to discredit Brutus' speech. This is ethos. He doesn't just come right out and say, no, Brutus is wrong. he's trying to create this argument so the people come to that conclusion on their own. He says, "Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, And Brutus is an honorable man." (Act 3.2) His criticism of Brutus is very undermining. He wants to praise Brutus instead making sure that he's not putting him down. But while he's praising him he's also invalidating his
Brutus uses the appeals of Ethos, Pathos, Logos to manipulate the thoughts and feelings of the plebeians to join Brutus’
This makes Brutus and his speech seem weak and not as important, or reliable. Since Mark Antony has made the people of Rome feel bad about Ceasar’s death, they also begin to feel resentment towards Brutus and the
His main point boils down to ambition being a negative as he says to the crowd, in his explanation of the death ‘as he was ambitious, I slew him.” Brutus them attempts to persuade the crowd that he is trustworthy and did this for the good of Rome. He explains to the crowd “ As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honour him…” Though Caesar did all these great things, it was the fatal flaw of ambition that brought the daggers to him. In the mind of the conspirators they ask the crowd the rhetorical question,“Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?”
He offered to die for Rome but the crowd said no because they understand his perspective. The play of Julius Caesar states, "Who here is so vile that he doesn't love his country?" (Act 3, Scene 2). This quote from the play shows that Brutus knows everyone loves Rome and justifies his actions.
Brutus uses it to try and stir up the feelings of his audience, the Roman people, so that they can be on his side on why he killed Caesar. It was very effective. It shows how effective it is at the end of his speech. The text says, “Live, Brutus! live, live!”
First, Antony uses ethos to attack the credibility of his adversary, Brutus. Antony exclaims,”But Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” (III. ii. 103-104). In this example, Antony shows the crowd
After the death of Julius Caesar, the people of Rome demanded an answer. An audience gathered to hear both the speeches of Brutus and Mark Antony, since Brutus allowed Antony to speak. Brutus went first, trying to persuade the crowd to realize this was a necessary evil. Mark Antony went after Brutus and took a different approach. He used pathos, which means he appealed to the audiences emotions and feelings.
Cassius a talented general and long time acquaintance of caesar whose jealousy grew as caesar 's power grew making him almost god like in the eyes of the roman people , and in the end his jealousy would be his ultimate downfall. How could this single man persuade one of rome 's most beloved and trusted figures to turn on one of his most true friends, and end up killing the leader of rome? “ Well Brutus thou art noble, yet i see thy honorable metal may be wrought from that it is disposed . therefore it is meet that noble minds keep ever with their likes; For who so firm that cannot be seduced?” .
In Act 3 Scene 2 Brutus said during his speech, “If that friend then demands to know why Brutus turned against Caesar, this is my answer: Not because I cared for Caesar less, but because I cared for Rome more”. Brutus had courage to kill Caesar, not because he wanted to, but for the good of Rome and its people. During the entirety of the story, Brutus
While Brutus spoke well, but had no real factual standpoint, Antony gave many examples of Caesar’s achievements. In his speech he uses Pathos, Logos, Ethos, and Situational Irony to sway his audience. He uses Brutus’ and Cassius’ precious honor and Caesar’s achievements against them, saying, “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept./ Ambition should be made of sterner stuff./ Yet Brutus says he was ambitious,/ And Brutus is an honorable man” (3.2.90-93). In this statement and many other statements following the same pattern Antony degrades the honor and the arguments of Caesar’s ambition that were made by Brutus and the other conspirators.
“For let the gods so speed me as I love The name of honor more than I fear death.” (Act 1 Scene 2 Lines 90-91) In this quote he is explaining he is willing to die for the benefit of Rome. “Where many of the best respect in Rome, Except immortal Caesar, speaking of Brutus” (Act l. Scene 2. Lines 61-62) This shows that Brutus is an honorable man , and even Caesar friends thinks
Brutus believes that Caesar will do more harm than good to the people, and reap benefits for himself. Brutus has already said this, but had said it in his own words, (II, i, 12-14). He has no clue if Caesar will use his power for the good and betterment for the people, or use it for his own needs and other
Ethos is seen in this proclamation because Cassius is convincing Brutus that both him and Cassius have gone through the same hardships that Caesar has gone through. This makes both Cassius and Brutus credible for the leadership position which Caesar has. Moreover, Cassius addresses pathos when he remiences about the time when he had to save Caesar at Timber River; The torrent roared, and we did buffet it with lusty sinews, throwing it aside and stemming it with hearts of controversy. But ere we could arrive the point proposed, Caesar cried, “Help me, Cassius, or I sink!”. Through this specific part of Cassius’s speech, he was able to present many different emotions: Caesar was fearful, and Cassius was angry because Caesar was suppose to be his fearless leader that was not scared of anything.
(II, i, 53-55) which allows to say that he wants Rome to be just and do whatever it takes to maintain it away from any threat. Indeed, Brutus states this very clearly when he says, “If it’s for the good of all Romans, I’d do it even if it meant my death. Let the gods give me good luck only as long as I love honor more than I fear death.” (I, ii, 86-88), he explicitly says that the good of the majority is over any feeling or personal benefit which in this case is the love of Caesar for him and viceversa, and the throne. To conclude, Brutus is a complex character that is characterized by three recurrent traits: his well-intention, his hypocrisy, and his naivet.
Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar