“Julius Caesar,” by William Shakespeares is based on the killing of Julius Caesar and the events that follow his death. After Julius Caesar was killed by a group of men, which included Marcus Brutus and Cassius, two speeches were recited. One by Marc Antony and the other by Marcus Brutus. Both men gave reasonable speeches concerning their side of the situation. The question that has surfaced now is, “How were the speeches similar, but different?” As well as, “Who had the better speech?” Each man’s speech used the rhetorical strategies of pathos, logos, and ethos to give a clear understanding of what each wanted the people of Rome to take from their speeches. Marc Antony speech was stronger due to his effective different rhetorical strategies. …show more content…
Antony says, “look in this place ran Cassius’ dagger through… See what a rent the envious Casca made… Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabbed.” These images stir up emotion, Antony wants the people of Rome to be infuriated with Brutus and mentally paint a picture of what they did. Brutus takes a different approach and for a testimonial, “any dear friend Caesar’s, to him I say, that Brutus’ love Caesar was no less than his.” The similarity between the two speeches shows a goal both men wanted to achieve, which is to appeal to the heart and emotion. Antony’s speech, “Judge, O you gods, how dearly Caesar loved him.” Brutus evidence as already been represented by the quote previously in the …show more content…
Ethos is the ongoing establishment of a writer’s or speaker’s authority and credibility. “They that have done this deed are honorable.” Antony shows an accurate citation of source from this quote. To elaborate, Antony was giving credit where credit was due, to Brutus and Cassius and the group of men that helped killed Caesar honorable. Brutus’s quote, I have the same dagger for myself, when it shall please m country to need my death,” analysis humility. Succeeding Caesar’s death Brutus didn’t go around flaunting that he and a group of men killed Julius Caesar. Though there are different ethos categories, here are the similarities. The appropriate tone was illustrated by both speeches. Antony's quote, “if you have ten, prepare to shed them now.” Brutus’s, “for mine honour, censure me in your wisdom, that you may the better judge. Due to the certain situation both men wanted to make sure they come across as gentlemen and soft-hearted to the people of
Antony’s speech paints Brutus as a hypocrite, when, ironically, it is Antony who is the true deceiver. Throughout his speech, Antony
“Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than Caesar were dead to live all free men? The last appeal Brutus uses is Pathos to give emotions to his words. Pathos is the appeal to emotion and Brutus uses it to show his feelings towards Rome are immense that he killed Caesar to stop his “ambitions” from controlling Rome. On line 36 Brutus says “With this I depart,--that, as I slew my best lover for the good of Rome.
Julius Caesar Speeches Comparison After the assassination of the Roman leader, Julius Caesar many people were left devastated. The Romans continuously questioned Caesar’s death, which lead to the two men, Mark Antony and Brutus to deliver speeches to the citizens. Brutus gave the citizens a speech with tons of logos to keep the citizens engaged in the beginning, but the tables turned after Antony’s speech. Even though Brutus had a strong impact on the citizens of Rome, Antony grabbed the citizens attention more effectively by showing sympathy for Caesar. Although both of the speeches given were convincing and persuasive, Antony ultimately made a lasting impact because he used pathos when he says “ when that poor have cried, Caesar hath wept”
In the play Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, the emperor of Rome is killed by his best friend, Brutus. At the funeral of the fallen ruler, Brutus gives a big speech to the crowd. He tries to explain why he and the other senators had to kill the emperor, Julius Caesar. In the speech, he informs them that Caesar was too ambitious, and says he chose Rome over his dear friend. Once Brutus was done, Marc Antony gave his speech to persuade the crowd that Julius wasn’t ambitious at all.
Most times, when one thing is said, two things can be heard. The intent of the speech can be genuine and straightforward, or hidden in double-think and entendre. In Julius Caesar, this is the case with the dichotomy between Brutus and Marc Antony's speeches. the speeches both are given to sway the crowd to one side, and both use the tools of pathos, ethos, and antithesis to lead the country to their rallying cry.
This shows that Caesar wasn't ambitious and trustworthy. Antony uses his emotions to also win the people's trust. Antony is talking about the emotional story of how Caesar was murdered. He brings the people to a sad state and the Romans start to respect Antony more. Brutus thought that his reasoning behind the assassination of Caesar would be enough to persuade that the killing of Caesar was the right thing to do.
So it is all on the line for Antony and Brutus. Brutus did a great job of using logos and lots of ethos in his speech, but most of his reasons to justify Caesar’s slaying were predictions of Caesar’s future behavior. Antony uses a lot of statements that are primarily pathos to persuade the crowd that the great Julius should still be alive. This is most of the reason why Antony’s address is the better of the two. Here are some of the fallacies that Brutus uses.
In Act 3, Scene 2 of the tragedy of Julius Caesar written by Shakespeare, there are 2 very important speeches that shape the countrymen’s view on the death of Caesar. Marcus Brutus gives the first speech in an attempt to justify the murder he and his fellow conspirators just committed and the second speech is given by Mark Antony to open the citizen’s eyes to just how dishonorable and heinous the crime these men committed was. Both men use many rhetorical strategies in their speeches such as syntax to create juxtaposition and word choice to highlight the similarities and differences between the audience and the speaker in order to create an effect of either superiority or relatability to the audience. Each speech was effective in persuading the people to agree with a certain view, however in the end Mark Antony gave the speech that won the crowd.
Rhetoric in the Speeches of Brutus and Antony The death of Caesar is a controversial topic and was even more controversial at the time of his funeral when when senators were trying to benefit from his death by getting the Roman citizens on their side. At Caesar’s funeral, two senators gave speeches as an attempt to get the roman people on their side. Out of the two speeches, Marc Antony’s speech was more effective because of his use of appeals and biases, being 100% true and had a larger variety of rhetorical devices.
At the funeral, both of Caesar’s friends, Brutus and Antony, made a speech. In Brutus’s speech he was very concise and was saying that he did it all for Rome. Brutus used logos and ethos in his speech. To fortify his speech, he used logos which is logic and reason. In his speech, he says listen to my reasons and he goes onto his reasons that Caesar would have become ambitious and enslaved them all.
Brutus did not consider that Cassius the one the decieved him would want to come in power. When Caesar died Mark Anthony and Brutus each gave a speech about Julius Caesar. The difference between the funeral speeches for Julius Caesar is that Brutus added point and rational speech, while Mark Antony puts sentiment in his speech. But first lets talk about Brutus and what his speech was about. Brutus is a shy person, he is
In the novel "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" after Caesar was assassinated two people read speeches for him. One of the men was named Brutus he was actually involved in the killing of Julius Caesar. the other man was named Mark Antony he was a friend of Caesar and believed that it was wrong for Brutus and the other people to have killed Caesar because of their accusations. They both had different sides to tell about Caesar and why they are doing what they are doing now for the country. The speeches are given before and during the funeral of Caesars body as some of the people went to Brutus to hear his speech and some went with someone else because they didn 't believe he needed a speech.
In the play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" by Shakespeare, two individuals named Brutus and Antony give a funeral oration to the people of Rome in concern of the justification of Caesars death. Both of them share an opposite view towards the death of Caesar, Antony thinks his death was unjustified, while Brutus believes in the opposite. Despite the fact that Brutus was able to deliver a better ethical appeal. Antony delivers a more persuasive rhetorical speech since he appeals to the crowd more with his emotional and logical appeal Ethical appeal was used by both individuals in their funeral orations, evidently Brutus was able to execute a better ethical appeal than Antony. Brutus wanted to make the people of Rome feel like the death of Caesar was necessary for the sake of Rome.
Julius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.
Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar