The Incident Response Framework developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is a comprehensive collection of rules for managing cybersecurity issues. The framework is intended to assist organisations in preparing for, detecting, responding to, and recovering from cyber assaults.
Preparation, Detection and Analysis, Containment, Eradication, and Recovery are the four major steps of incident response outlined by the NIST Incident Response Framework. Each step contains a collection of recommended tasks and best practises to assist organisations in managing cybersecurity incidents efficiently.
The preparation phase focuses on activities that assist organisations in preparing for future cybersecurity incidents. Creating
…show more content…
Organisations can better prepare for and respond to cyber assaults by following the framework's rules and best practises, lowering the risk of damage to their essential assets and reputation.
The NIST incident response framework is a complete framework comprised of five phases: preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication, and recovery. Each phase is intended to cover specific tasks and activities that organisations must carry out when responding to crises. The framework emphasises the necessity of planning, which includes designing incident response policies, processes, and plans as well as performing employee training and awareness programmes.
In contrast, the SANS incident response architecture comprises six phases: preparation, identification, containment, eradication, recovery, and lessons learned. The framework emphasises the value of ongoing improvement and learning from previous experiences. The lessons learned phase is intended to ensure that the organisation identifies and implements areas for improvement into future incident response
…show more content…
The identification step is intended to assess the type and scope of the incident, the severity of the impact, and the necessary reaction.
Technical vs. non-technical: The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) offers a more technical framework that contains thorough technical information and recommendations for developing incident response systems. The framework covers subjects including incident detection, investigation, and containment, as well as technical considerations like system backup and recovery.
SANS focuses on high-level incident response guidance and best practises. The framework offers advice on topics like forming a security incident response team, establishing communication channels, and defining incident response procedures.
NIST is a larger framework that addresses all types of occurrences, such as cyber attacks, physical security breaches, and natural disasters. The framework is intended to be adaptable to various sorts of occurrences and organisations.
SANS focuses mostly on cyber security incidents. While the framework does cover some non-cyber occurrences, such as physical security breaches, it is primarily concerned with responding to cyber security
As a member of the Homeland Security Assessment Team for our organization, we will attempt to build a program that will allow us to meet the goals of our business plan as well as the needs of our Homeland Security Assessment that we will create from the results of our evaluation of our organization (Fisher, 2004). We will utilize the Baldridge Criteria to combine our two-goal seeking areas of our business plan as well as our Homeland Security Assessment goals that we are identified at the conclusion of our Homeland Security Assessment. When we do our Baldridge Criteria measurements of our organization we will be able to determine the areas of our organization that we are already protected from weaknesses and vulnerabilities; and will be able
As part of NIMS, ICS is meant to be “a system for domestic incident management that is based on an expandable, flexible structure, and that uses common terminology, positions, and incident facilities” (Walsh, 2012). In order to have a successful ICS,
In July of 2005, Secretary Chertoff announced a six-point agenda for the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) that would address the policies, operations and the structures for present and future threats to the United States (Department of Homeland Security, n.d). These new initiatives would provide a new structure for the Department of Homeland Security that would allow it to manage risk better. The purpose of the agenda was to strengthen the countries vulnerabilities to the increasing threats from terrorism, natural disasters, technological disasters and cyber threats. These initiatives would increase the countries overall preparedness for a national incident, provide security enhancements to the countries transportations system, strengthen
But all attacks and threats are not physical, some are in cyberspace in an attempt to hack into secure mainframes to steal information. In coordination with the DoD, “DHS developed the interim National Cyber Incident Response Plan13, which outlines domestic cyber incident response coordination and execution among federal, state and territorial, and local governments, and the private sector.” (GAO, 2012, pg. 9) These attacks can cause major damage, either to individuals by stealing identities, or to the community by manipulating the economy or compromising
Given the robust nature of the homeland security system in the United States, the abilities to forecast and meet challenges that are presented to the nation will continue to be met. For all of the incidents that are prevented or dealt with in an acceptable manner, the incident that is most talked about is the one that slipped through the cracks. In order to prevent this from happening the homeland security machine needs to continue to be a well oiled machine that continually evolves and adapts to the changing
They help clients identify millions in annual network management savings. Also, they help clients to demonstrate compliance with various North American regulatory requirements and internal compliance frameworks. They provide: o Threat Risk Assessments o Vulnerability Assessments & Penetration Testing o Emergency Incident Response o Computer Forensic Services o Network Environmental Scan o Security Optimization o Security Awareness o Data Loss Risk Assessments o PCI DSS 3.0 Audit
For each of the threats and vulnerabilities from the Identifying Threats and Vulnerabilities in an IT Infrastructure lab in this lab manual (list at least three and no more than five) that you have remediated, what must you assess as part of your overall COBIT P09 risk management approach for your IT infrastructure? Denial of service attack- close the ports and change the passwords. Loss of Production Data- Backup the data and restore the data from the most recent known safe point. Unauthorized access Workstation-
Incident command system refers to a comprehensive system that is developed to help responders to form an intricate system that meets the demands of a single or multiple incidents (Carmicheal, 2010). The goal is to avoid confusion and increase efficiency in handling all the activities within the shortest time possible. The current scenario is characterized by a severe natural disaster that has hit the community of Edenton. Extensive damages are being reported from the multiple points in the city, which means the responders should form a team that can handle each point.
There are two categories; 1 is about doing risk assessments and figuring out what to do when an emergency occurs. 2 is about organization of things such as transport, this group is less likely to be involved in main planning of work but will be involved in incidents/emergencies that affect sectors. This policy and procedure is for incident and emergencies. This promotes safety because routes and procedures have been planed and placed in order in case of an emergency, by doing this it helps reduce the chance of any injuries or deaths when an emergency is happening.
These tragic events also highlighted the need for improvements in emergency management, incident response, and coordination processes across the United States (Shusta, et al., p. 268, 2015). The National Incident Management System (NIMS) was established by the Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD-5), and is under the control of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (Shusta, et al., p. 268, 2015).
The National Preparedness System “outlines an organized process for everyone” and consists of six parts (National preparedness system, n.d.). These parts identify and assess risk, estimate and determine the capabilities and activities necessary to confront the situations, consider the best way to use resources to build capabilities, prepare, plan and deliver for each part of a community, validate capabilities, and finally review and update when necessary (id.). There are systems in place to do this including the Strategic National Risk Assessment, the State Emergency Operations Plans, the National Incident Management System, the Remedial Action Management Program, and the Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
The Incident Command System (ICS) is a management system designed to enable effective and efficient domestic incident management by integrating a combination of facilities, equipment, personnel, procedures, and communications operating within a common organizational structure. ICS is normally structured to facilitate activities in five major functional areas: command, operations, planning, logistics, intelligence and investigations, finance and administration. It is a fundamental form of management, with the purpose of enabling incident managers to identify the key concerns associated with the incident, often under urgent condition and without losing attention to any component of the command system. The Incident Command System was created in
The EOC and Homeland Security created a bioterrorism preparedness plan that includes prevention through detect and report any suspicious activity, investigate, control and recover, and improve prior terrorist incidents to protect the public. During President Bush tenure, he mandated the Homeland Security Presidential Directive 8 (HSPD 8) in 2003 to authenticate policies and procedures for a strategic plan for emergency responders to follow. According to Richter, A., & Santiago, D. (2006), “HSPD-8 introduced the concept of “all hazards preparedness” based on the existence of plans, procedures, policies, training, and equipment to maximize the effectiveness of a multi-discipline response effort in the event of any type of emergency” (p. 9). The cooperation between the EOC and Homeland Security have solid planning preparedness to aid local, state, and federal emergencies if they occur in the future. The effective responses to all chemical or biological attacks faced by Americans.
This is because both activities are designed to avoid an emergency situation before it begins or minimize the effects after one has taken place. However, while a mitigation activity can take place before or after an incident has occurred, a preparation activity takes place before an emergency happens (FEMA, n.d.). Activities that are included in the preparedness phase include evacuation plans, running fire drills, and having food and water purchased and stored. The goal of this phase is to minimize the ill effects of an emergency and increasing the chance of survival. Preparation saves
Cybersecurity has become a growing cause for concern in the United States and indeed countries around the world. On February 9, 2016 President Barack Obama announced his Cybersecurity National Action plan (CNAP) to further the nations efforts to protect government agencies, citizens, and businesses from cyber threats domestic and abroad. However, cybersecurity is not a new issue in fact it is as old as the internet itself. With that said, I keep thinking back to that warm September day stained with the image of an enormous fireball engulfing our small TV set. This horrific day changed the course of history forever along with my future career path.