Indigenous groups, and their relationships to the land and the environment, are connected deeply to the core. Land and environment is a part of their identity, and is rooted in their culture and history. Innu tribe, which sometimes are called Montagnais, or Naskapi, are aboriginal peoples, who are located in areas of Quebec and Labrador. Montagnais, which is translated in French as mountain people. It relates to the people who live in forested, more southern communities. While Naskapi, is more related to northern groups that live in the barren islands of the subarctic. The Innu tribe were spread across a lot of land, and there weren 't any land negotiations. So they never had any aboriginal title to their lands. This has caused a lot problems …show more content…
Place names are very important to Aboriginal people, because the names of places give useful information. For example, certain names gives insight on places that are good for hunting, fishing, or it can also give a great description of the land. So when certain people are traveling, they used these names, as a guide to know where to stop, or what places to avoid. One of the most unique things about place names, is that some are used when telling stories about people 's experiences on the land. This is what makes the Innu culture so different from others, they use their environment, and the land that surrounds them to spread memories to their friends, and family …show more content…
The major issues that the sit highlights are the Land Claims. The claims to land are the major issues for the Innu nation currently. These land claims have been going on for the decades, and the people of the Innu nation just would like to have answers by now. Higgins state "Land claim negotiations often take years or decades to complete and must pass through a series of steps, including a Framework Agreement, an Agreement-in-Principle, a Final Agreement, and implementation" (Higgins 2008). Right now, the nation is still working towards having an Agreement-in-Principle. After all these decades, they are still in the first half of the process, and this isn 't something that keeps the nation patient. Land claims are a long process, and it will still take decades, before there is a final resolution. These land claims relate to globalization by the Innu nation wanting the Canadian government to give them their rights. This cause two nations to come together and form a reasonable solution. The Innu needs as much support that they can receive to help fund research. The more people that can help, the stronger their proof can become. The more research that is taken place, can help the Nation show the Canadian government that they do have the rights to the land of their ancestors. This proof can probably help the process go a
“This is our land! It isn’t a piece of pemmican to be cut off and given in little pieces to us. It is ours and we will take what we want.” (voices and visions chapter 8 pg.181, poundmaker in the english tongue) The Cree and many Métis believed that the land was theirs and they were entitled to it.
The Indigenous groups involved in previous treaties found that the government of Canada and Ontario were not living up to their promises and that settlers were encroaching on non-negotiated land in their northern hunting territories. The government then assigned a commission in 1923 that was comprised of Sinclair, McFadden and Williams (Hall, 2011). The treaties were then negotiated as people had already settled on the territory of the eight communities of Indigenous people that were involved. The Williams treaties were comprised of two separate treaties each looking at different land masses, the one directly related to our geographical location being the second signed between the commission and the Mississauga communities, this land stretched from lake Simcoe to the shore of Lake Ontario. The Williams treaty also included the land that was originally within the gunshot treaty, but unfortunately did not include the Mississaugas of New Credit First Nation whose ancestors who were a part of the original treaty.
The Variations Between the Red Rock and the Mohawk of the Bay of Quinte in their Reserve Lands, Languages and Religious Beliefs Kashfa Shaikh 0961185 ANTH*1150 It is known by many that Canada’s origins lie with the First Nations. The First Nations have been around for centuries, spreading across Canada. Through this time, there has been a development of a variety of cultural and religious practices that differentiate the groups and tribes of the First Nations.
As for positive outcomes to this situation, I honestly don’t believe The Mohawk’s in any positive way, had any good positive outcomes, the Government of Canada did it for their own benefit,
has title to the land owing to the fact that the Canada did not own the land in the first place and how Canada forgets about the land and the people on it. British Columbia has a history of Aboriginal political struggle. It began in the 19th century when the Aboriginals began to push the government for treaties and land claims. They investigated these problems and David Mackay spoke for the Nisga’a people saying “what we don’t like about the government is their saying this: ‘we will give you this much land.’ how can they give it when it is our own?
Having been born and bred outside the United States, the city I grew up was more influenced by the people of India rather than Native people. Therefore, I began to search the Internet for Native tribes where I came across the Duwamish tribe. The Duwamish tribe lived in Seattle, Washington from the past 10,000 years, making them one of the oldest Native tribes that we know of in the entire world. Today, the Duwamish tribe are one of the few federally recognised Native tribes. In this research project I intend to gain a better understanding as to how a Native tribe that has existed since the glacier age has escaped being eradicated through both wars and disease.
Essay Outline The human race that inhabited the lands earlier than anyone else, Aboriginals in Canada had conquered many obstacles which got them to what they are today. In the past, Canadian Aboriginals have dealt with many gruesome issues that primarily involved the Canadians opposing them or treating them like ‘‘wards.’’ The Indian Act is a written law which controls the Indian’s lives and it is often amended several times to make Indian lives either peaceful or cruel but especially, cruel. Aboriginals found the Indian Act a massive problem in their lives due to it completely controlling them and how they lived on their reserve.
Lastly, it is necessary to look at aboriginals as people, and not a foreign
The "Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada" thoroughly reviews the unique laws held by each indigenous tribe, detailed on pages forty-five to eighty-one. Additionally, the report highlights the difference between Aboriginal and indigenous laws and how these laws have negatively impacted them. It also outlines Canada's efforts toward reconciliation with them. In the report, the author states that there is a difference between Aboriginal laws and Indigenous laws.
Any and all Colonist trade and land from the Aboriginal territory south of Quebec was halted and handed to Quebec. However the King is too cruel the man to stop there. He granted them the religious freedom we have been yearning for since 1607. Intolerable is too generous a word. Our once great Mother land has betrayed us too deeply to simply forgive.
Belonging to the land and to each other is fundamental to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and their culture. Connections with the land, families, clans and communities are at the core of Aboriginality. It is through these connections that nurture belonging from which Aboriginal peoples identities and cultures emerge.
These identities existed long before Canada officially became a country, by political standards, 150 years ago. While First Nations are legally considered Canadians, the opinion on their national identity understandably differs between Aboriginals due to the unfair treatment of Aboriginals by the Canadian government. The First Nations’ collective identity has been deeply affected by the long history of violence and assimilation committed against them through genocide, unfair treaties, forcing them onto reservations, and residential schools. Nowadays, most post-secondary institutions offer courses on Aboriginal Studies to spread knowledge about Aboriginal culture as an integral component of Canada. Aboriginals can be considered a nation within Canada, similar to Francophones.
Throughout the history of the United States, there generally have been dozens of particularly social movements, which is fairly significant. From the African American Civil Rights Movement in 1954 to the feminism movement in 1920, protests for all intents and purposes have helped these groups basically earn rights and fight injustice in a really major way. Some injustices that these groups face range from lack of voting rights to police brutality, or so they essentially thought. The indigenous people of North America aren’t actually immune to these injustices, basically contrary to popular belief. Back in the 1968, the American Indian Movement generally was formed to for all intents and purposes give natives security and peace of mind in a
Institutional and historical analysis often portray the motives of governments, especially in the cases of Quebec separatism and Aboriginal mistreatment. History describes attempts at compromise to rectify the problems by altering political institutions to provide more autonomy to the provinces, witness in various accords and the methods described previously. However, in regards to Aboriginals a historical relationship of exploitation and eradication sheds on the systemic issues that Aboriginals cope with and the institutions that caused them. As scholars of Canadian politics, it is important to consider historical and institutional analyses when looking at any issue, as it reveals the underlying motives of actors in regards to the cleavages that comprise a state.
In the Philippines, the 1987 Philippine Constitution declares that education is a right of every Filipino (Maligalig, 2010). Thus, the policies of the government on education have been primarily about education for all citizens. Being a right, this must benefit every member of the Philippine population regardless of their language and ethnicity. The right to education, however, must not be confined in the context of being able to go to school or having more areas and structures for schooling. The right to education is undermined and meaningless if teachers are under-trained, learning curricula and materials are irrelevant and learning environment is unsafe and not conducive (Mapa, 2013).