‘The conflict between King Henry II and Thomas Becket was caused more by issues of principle than by a clash of personalities.’
The argument on whether the conflict between Becket and Henry was caused by an issue of principle than personality changes between 1163 and 1170. Both personality and principle comes into effect at different events but it is ultimately personality that dominates for both Thomas and Henry.
Henry chose Becket as Archbishop for his own needs this was clear as Becket was everything an Archbishop of Canterbury should not be, Henry believed Thomas would act on his orders and would place Prince Henry heir to the throne of England. 1164 was the first sign of a split between Henry and Thomas occurred. Henry passed a law which
…show more content…
Thomas was ultimately doing what he was asked, his role as Archbishop required him to look after the best interests of the Church. Henry expected Becket to be manipulated by him to have an ally in the Church. Henrys personality led him to choose Becket as Archbishop due to their friendship of many years but mainly to use him to control the growing rights and powers of the Church. Henry wanted to ensure that all his vassals, ecclesiastical and lay, would owe allegiance to him, and not the Pope. However principle came into effect when Becket tried to protect the Church. After 1163 Becket and Henry where no longer friend, Henry in July 1163 proposed a sheriffs aid however Beckett stated that the sheriffs aid was not a royal rent and refused to pay it from his estates or Church lands. Animosity arose between Henry and Beckett …show more content…
However it soon turned into anger and as Thomas Becket pushed so the King began to push back and the quarrel intensified. This led to the trial of Becket which was significant because it shows a clear sign of personality dominating. Henry saw the problem of ‘criminous clerks’ as one where he could assert the King’s customary rights over the church, drawn up as the Constitutions of Clarendon. He wanted the clergy who were convicted of serious crimes to be tried in ordinary courts of law rather than ecclesiastical. Thomas publically accepted these constitutions only to renounce them later. Though Henry had strong principle it was evident in the trial of Becket in 1164 that Henry‘s personality took over. The King began to attack Becket whenever he could. At Northampton in October, Becket was summon not as an Archbishop but as a Baron accused of wrongful behaviour. Beckett was accused of contempt for the oath he had taken at Clarendon to observe the ancient customs of the realm and failure to repay royal loans which was untrue and was significant in showing Henrys personality take
Cromwell’s next revolutionary, perhaps controversial idea for the Church of England was the translation of the bible, converting it from Latin to English. As previously mentioned, Henry was reluctant in directing his new church away from Catholicism, rather shaping it around the same traditional practices. Nonetheless, Cromwell pursued the king, who was at this time with his new love, Jane Seymour and in a particularly good mood. Persuading the king was almost like a second language for Cromwell at this point and after the pull of his ear, Henry consented. John Schofield describes this as Cromwell’s “Crowning mercy” by convincing Henry.
It’s important to understand that Henry’s position started off as fairly insecure - primarily due to his lineage being from a second marriage, and from the maternal line - which means he was very susceptible to opposition that could easily threaten his position if he did not overcome these crises. There were many Yorkists that rejected his claim, as well as men with
One of the reasons Cromwell made reforms to England in the 1530s was that there was still opposition to Henry being Supreme Head of the Church. It was important to have everyone on the king’s side, because without that his ideas would be ignored. Contradicting views would be discussed and spread widely between friends and acquaintances who would spread the information even more. The largest problem was when public figures expressed their opinions. For example, Elizabeth Barton was a nun who was widely respected and believed to have apparitions of G-d.
Historical records, notes, and manuscripts from Cranmer’s life point to King Henry VIII as the major influencer from 1529 onward. Since Scripture states God appoints leadership, Cranmer believed that the Supreme Headship expressed God’s will and it was his duty to serve the King and support him in his endeavors. On February 6, 1536, during Parliamentary sessions, Thomas Cranmer launched into a series of weekly sermons at Paul’s Cross. This would be the last Parliamentary session for the next three years, and its importance was signaled by the attendance of the Lord Chancellor Audley and the assembled clergy of Convocation.
Henry VIII and Wolsey’s foreign policy during the time period saw many adjustments of which large European power they would support, be it Charles V or Francis I. There was also a balanced approach mixing war and peaceful treaties to try and achieve long lasting peace and secure England’s place in European politics. We can see shifts in their policies depending on who they are supported by and what their main aim is to get out of the situation. On one hand, we can see Henry VIII pursued war as a means of glory by the numerous invasions he made into France, first in 1511 and later in 1513. This was one of Henry’s first moves as he King of England which would suggest that he did this to prove he was worthy of being King as Henry V had proven
Thomas Becket Thomas Becket was born in the year 1120. Well educated, he was the son of a merchant ("Thomas Becket(c. 1120 - 1170)"). He went to school in Paris and went from there to England. While he was in England, he was in the house of Theobold, the Archbishop of Canterbury.
Thomas Wolsey was infamous for his character within the Henrician period. His efforts affected many aspects within this time, which were enforced to such a high standard due to the power of his positions within the Church and State. Due to this Wolsey, other than Henry VIII, was considered the most influential mind in England, which was all due to the infinite strings he managed as a puppeteer of Henry 's relations. Wolsey managed to carefully climb the ladder to his successes, eliminating threats along the way only leaving him with a easier and more obtainable goal. How Wolsey managed to obtain so much power and influence within such a short time helped discourage those who stood against him, but over time Wolsey had managed to curate his devotion
In Greek mythology, Kairos, the youngest child of Zeus, is the god of opportunity and favorable moments. According to the Greeks, he is responsible for providing just the right thing, at just the right time. In Shakespeare’s King Henry V, King Henry finds himself in need of precisely this type of favor as he faces daunting odds. Specifically, what King Henry needs are just the right words and demeanor to inspire his army to fight, despite the unfavorable odds of victory and death. What can King Henry possibly say to get this band of English commoners and criminals to face certain death for the sake of his honor and glory?
Henry's actions were based solely on personal reasons. At the beginning, Henry broke away from Rome because of his assertions of royal supremacy. The England church was a ‘monarchical’. Before he became king , he had a prayer scroll containing illuminations of the Trinity, the crucified Christ, and several martyred saints. The prayers contained martyred saints, St George slaying the dragon, and Christ’s passion.
Pope Innocent would understand this and moreover would come to realise that he had potentially created the problem through his handling of a key appointment to the cathedra of the Archbishop of Canterbury. Pope Innocent chose a man whose quest for power and influence would take the English monarchy to the brink of disintegration and which would have seen all of Europe collapse like a house of cards as those governed in each country realised that the authority to rule and be ruled was voluntary and no longer secured by might but rather by those who were ruled accepting
This primary source, is a historical text, a transcription of a speech by Elizabeth I, Queen of England. In fact, there are at least two main versions of this important speech. To understand the importance of the speech we must remember that at that time England and Spain had intermittent conflicts. At this period Spain, was ruled by Philip II and England was ruled by Elizabeth I.
Henry the VIII was important to history because he established the church of England and began the protestant reformation in England. When Henry became the king England the head of the church was the pope everything was written in Latin and almost everything was based on the Roman Catholic church. By the time Henry had died the king was the head of the church. Most of the prayers were said in Latin but The “Lord’s Prayer” was spoken in English.
In the play Henry IV, Part One, King Henry bases honor upon how momentous a kingdom is perceived.
Patrick Henry’s use of rhetorical questions aided his persuasive speech to the Virginia Convention. First of all, he used a rhetorical question when he said, “Shall we try argument,” (Henry 101). This quote proves that the common people shouldn’t attempt to create a dispute between themselves & Britain. He said this because he didn’t want things to get more worse than they already were.
Henry was telling how bad Becket was and that he was a traitor. Everyone still trusted Becket and ignored Henry. Henry was very mad at Becket. Becket did not want a war with Henry, but he did not want to be cruel. Henry was furious and was talking about Becket when four of his knights mistakenly thought Henry wanted Becket dead.