The Fortress of Louisbourg
Imagine the smell of fresh baked bread, the hammering of the blacksmith and the marching of soldiers. This is what it would have been like in the Fortress of Louisbourg and what it has been made into again today. Louisbourg was built to protect the entrance into the St Lawrence, which was the key to the rest of New France, during the time when New France and the Thirteen colonies were fighting over North America, in the 1700s. In this essay I’m going to tell you about the history of the Fortress of Louisbourg. I’m going to do this first by telling about the people who lived there and it’s economy, then about it getting captured two times, and finally I will tell about its rebuilding into a historic site and what
…show more content…
The Thirteen colonies knew Louisbourg was a key to the rest of New France. In the winter of 1744-45 the House of Representatives voted to take action and sailed for Louisbourg. Governor Shirley of Massachusetts assembled about 4000 men and Connecticut and New Hampshire 100 men. On May 3rd 1745 several British warships joined the attack. The French sent messages to France for reinforcement but didn’t get any. On May 11th the British arrived and sent troops ashore. The French raced troops to the landing spot but were quickly pushed back into the Fortress of Louisbourg. The British turned upon the fortress unorganized and were forced back by heavy cannon fire. Then the British surrounded the Fortress of Louisbourg. Throughout June there was various attacks and counter attacks. The French were running low on gunpowder, and exhausted from fighting and repairing damage done on the fortress. The French twice attempted to send for relief supplies, but both failed. On June 26th , the British were ready to make a massive attack on the Fortress of Louisbourg. The French knew their situation was helpless with no relief in sight, so they surrendered. France was stunned that New Englanders had managed most of the attacks. There was much celebration in London and Boston but that was quickly forgotten becauses the Fortress of Louisbourg …show more content…
It is fascinating in three ways; the first way is, it had a unique society and industry, another is that throughout it’s history the Fortress of Louisbourg changed hands a number of times becauses of war and treaties. Finally the Fortress of Louisbourg has been rebuilt as a National Historic Park so that you can see the wonder of the Fortress of Louisbourg yourself. The Fortress of Louisbourg was of great significance to Canada because it was the most fortified city in Canada and the British had to get through it before they could conquer the rest of Canada. If the Fortress of Louisbourg was built the first there New France would have been captured What I have learned as a christian from this essay is that we shouldn’t put our trust in worldly things such as fortresses and armies, but that we should put our trust in the only sovereign God. Psalm 46:6, 7 “ 6The nations rage, the kingdoms totter; he utters his voice, the earth melts. “7The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our fortress.” Psalm 118:8 ,9 “8It is better to take refuge in the LORD than to trust in man. 9 It is better to take refuge in the LORD than to trust in princes.” From my essay I have learned a lot, not just about the Fortress of Louisbourg but also more about God and I am glad you could
There were 8,800 Americans, 7,800 French troops,9,000 British troops, about 20 French Navy boats, and about 10-20 British ships. The troops easily doubled the British soldiers. General Greene, General Lincoln, and Naval Admiral De Grasse were also there.
And lastly Amherst and his 11’000 men came from the St Lawrence River from Lake Ontario. To make sure there wasn’t another bloodbath, the French regiments of around 2’100 men, went to Place d’Armes and Montreal avoided this torture of a long capture. So then New France was then in the hands of the British.
The German gun positions were not aimed towards the sea, but coastline. However, they had Hitler’s Atlantic Wall to rely on. As they were approaching the shore, the Canadians were bombarded with weapons and heavy artillery, which was more deadly when the troops landed. Despite the circumstances of the Canadians, they were able to successfully land on Juno Beach, prepared to free France. D-Day was a defining moment for the Canadians not only because of this, but due to the fact that the troops’ had strong mental fortitudes regardless of the other factors that caused the
British controlled ports, canada and some of New York, now they wanted to get control of New England by controlling the ports on the Hudson River. But there was something in their way which is the battle of Saratoga, the battle was fought for 18 days, the first one took place on Freeman's farm, where they were surrounded by Americans and waited for British reinforcement, but there wasn’t any
Since New Orleans was surrounded by swamp and river, the British couldn’t get close enough to launch an attack from sea (Nardo 93). The swamps surrounding New Orleans made it to where British forces had to use a canal to get to the city (95). The British had to row supplies onto the shore from the ships nearly fifty miles away (93).On the day of the last battle it was foggy so it was hard for both sides to see in front of them yet alone the enemy coming for them. Along with several officers, Pakenham was killed in battle (“McManus”).
The American troops occupied the right side of the battlefield and the French held the left command by Rochambeau. On September 28, Washington reconnoitered the enemy’s placement on the field and planned his attack. That night Cornwallis’s men deserted their outpost. Cornwallis sent word to Sir Henry Clinton for reinforcements from the British fleets and army. Cornwallis later learned that Clinton’s departure has been delayed, and he would not be receiving the reinforcements he desperately needed.
The British had been preparing for a long time and were prepared for anything that came. So they sent a small group in straight ahead. Then, the rest of the army flanked from the back side and caught the United States majorly off guard (“The Battle Of
Despite this, he repeatedly commends Louis for his bravery and “his zealous care for the churches of God and his wonderful valor in administering the affairs of the kingdom” (Suger 23). By his reverent and admiring tone, Suger portrays Louis as a hero of France whose violent but forceful deeds were morally acceptable and even necessary for bringing order to his kingdom. For example, after laying siege to Corbeil and restoring a new count, Suger expresses that “by the gift of God, [Louis] gained an excellent victory and made the beginnings of his noble rule” (Suger 68). Suger’s tone remains consistent with each one of Louis’ acts, deeming them as appropriate and just responses to the various treachery that he had to face as the King of France. Not all of Louis’ deeds were violent, however; Suger supports Louis when he used discretion and peace when the situation called for it.
Why does Canada have so much French influence? Where did it come from and how? Aren’t we part of the British Commonwealth? These are all questions that I asked myself before learning about Samuel de Champlain and his influence on both France and Canada. Samuel de Champlain was a French explorer (cartographer, geographer, etc.) who journeyed across North America from 1603 until his death in 1635 (Ritchie, 2016; “Samuel de Champlain”, 2004; Wikipedia, 2016).
Even if they were frustrated with the British soldiers invading their town, there was no reason for them to do what they did which ultimately led to the soldiers opening fire out of
The capital itself was overrun and burned by British troops. However, as History.com states, “American troops were able to repulse British invasions in New York, Baltimore, and New Orleans, boosting national confidence and fostering a new spirit of patriotism.” Major General Andrew Jackson faced off against Sir Edward Pakenham in the infamous battle that was more specifically fought approximately four miles east of New Orleans in Chalmette. It was the final battle of a war that History.com says began “an era of partisan agreement and national pride.” At New Orleans, Jackson and the Americans were massively outnumbered and outgunned.
Germany had recently taken over Poland and was dominating Europe. At this point France was lost and it was evident that the British could no longer afford to stay in France.
All of these battles were greatly impacted by the Canadians and without some of them (Vimy Ridge in particular) Canada may not have gained any respect from other
The problem with this is that the French were repelled from Hougoumont several times throughout the day. This part of the battlefield was a huge failure on the French side which ended up having the opposite effect on what they wanted. Instead of drawing the British reserves in they had to throw their own reserves into the
This essay will examine the historical accuracy of the film Les Miserables in terms of the social, economic and political conditions in French society post French Revolution. The film Les Miserables depicts an extremely interesting time in French history (from about 1815-1832.) Even though the story line does not depict every detail and event that occurred during the time period as well as the fact that some aspects are dramatized for entertainment purposes, the film effectively spans thirty years of economic, political and social aspects of French Society. However it also manages to bring in references to the past, the French Revolution (1789-1799) and the impact it had on the society portrayed in the film.