A true hero Marcus Brutus, the man, the myth, and the legend, for it was he who died and killed for the good of Rome. Brutus had killed his best friend just so Caesar couldn’t lead Rome into Chaos. Brutus also had said, he would sacrifice himself if anything went wrong such as him becoming Caesar. Brutus was said to be one of the noblest Romans to ever live. Throughout the play Brutus has showed that he did what he thought was right and would be for the benefit of others. Out of all the wonderful acts Brutus did, when Brutus had killed Caesar was maybe one of the greatest. For Brutus had not stabbed Caesar out of anger or revenge, but so the people of Rome wouldn’t be put into harm's way. As he says in (II, i, 24-26), Brutus would not allow
He did not want to make his actions appear to be a senseless murder or a greedy attempt at gaining power; rather, he was trying to make his actions seem justified, and for the common good. Brutus’s use of syntax in the initial portion of his speech placed words in an order such that it appealed to the logic of the audiences, or in other words, used logos to convince the audience. In essence, he is making his organizing the words in a way such that it becomes cause-and-effect - “...As Caesar loved me, I weep for him. As he was fortunate, I rejoice at it. As he was valiant, I honor him.
Killing Caesar is the right way to keep the republic and rid the possibility of a single ruler. Brutus’s ancestors made the Roman Republic and he is very proud of that and feels he should keep what they started. This reasoning coupled with him wanting what is best for Rome makes it only logical that he kill Caesar. He has to kill Caesar because any other way of knocking him out of power will either not work or get him killed. Making it only logically and morally right to kill Caesar.
Brutus amittied Caesar was good to people, so why not to Rome? Also in the play, he took full responsibility for the stabbing, showing he was not
Brutus killed Caesar out of honor because he felt it was the best thing to do for the people of Rome. Brutus only wanted what was best for the people of Rome and the people around him. This can be seen in his speech in Act III, Scene ii, lines 18 through 19, “If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” Brutus explains that he killed Caesar not out of hate for him but because he felt it was for the good of Rome. Brutus was also an honorable man and the people around him knew that he was.
After a brief moment of reviewing this prolonged case, the members of the court hereby declare that Marcus Brutus, who was suspected and charged 1st degree murder for the assassination of Julius Caesar, is NOT guilty! It has been notable that Brutus is still noble to the people of Rome and still has their respect. He had the intention of questioning his motives when other members of the conspirators didn’t because he was smarter and more intelligent. Here was evidence of manipulation by Cassius, he created a false letter by the people of Rome to persuade Brutus to do something. Cassius talked poorly about Caesar’s health and physical condition and was the first to come with the plan.
Brutus has a vision, and he intends it to work out in every way he plans. In a sense he achieves what he wants, and killing Caesar may have been crucial to his short-lived success.
In Act 3 Scene 2 Brutus said during his speech, “If that friend then demands to know why Brutus turned against Caesar, this is my answer: Not because I cared for Caesar less, but because I cared for Rome more”. Brutus had courage to kill Caesar, not because he wanted to, but for the good of Rome and its people. During the entirety of the story, Brutus
Brutus is considered by many to be a “tragic hero”. Antony himself calls Brutus “the noblest Roman of all” (5.5.68). However, his actions were not those of a hero. Killing his best friend, attempting to trick and deceive the Roman public, and plunging Rome into a civil war are not the actions of a hero. Rather, they are the actions of an arrogant, ???????
When Brutus was talking to the conspirators Brutus was going back and forth think if he should help the conspirators kill Julius Caesar. He was going back and forth because he was thinking of the power he could have and could rule Rome. The reason behind Brutus killing Caesar was for the better of Rome. If Brutus would not have killed Caesar, Rome would have turned into a dictatorship, and in turn it would have ruined Rome and all of its people. Brutus did not kill Julius just for the power to rule Rome, he killed Julius to save Rome from Caesar’s dictatorship.
And while Brutus did work in part with other conspirators, which eventually led to him killing Caesar, he did it for a more morally sound reason which was that Caesar was going to cause the downfall of Rome because he was too ambitious, which is ironic because Caesar's death led to a string of unfit leaders, and civil unrest that eventually led to the downfall of the roman empire. Brutus was also focused on preventing corruption. “The name of Cassius honors this corruption,/ And chastisement doth therefore hide his head (IV.iii.15-6)... Remember March, the ides of March remember./ Did not great Julius bleed for justice' sake” (IV.iii.18-9).
Brutus realized the great harm Caesar could bring to Rome if the was crowned king. Although Brutus was easily persuaded by Cassius to go as far as committing a murder, Brutus did it because he thought that it was the best for Rome. Brutus does what he thinks is the absolute best for Rome which really shows his great honor and
He has realised his faults so clearly that he tells Caesar, the person he killed, to rest in peace. Brutus is definitely the tragic hero in this play because of the pity we feel for his realisation of his faults and ultimately his honourable
Brutus and Cassius are two prominent conspirators in the play Julius Caesar; one of these two fits Aristotle's depiction of a tragic hero. The difference between a normal hero and a tragic hero is that the latter will have a tragic flaw that keeps them from succeeding. These characters are often sympathetic and will cleave to the reader's pity. Firstly, we shall discuss Cassius. He was a man of questionable character.
Julius Caesar, is a play based on the true events that occurred in Roman history. The play follows the fictional lives of Caesar and his people leading up to, and after his assassination. Several characters can be labeled as both villainous and heroic at different points in the play due to their actions, however, this does not apply to the character of Marcus Junius Brutus, who remains a hero through the entire play. Brutus is a hero for several reasons, The first reason Brutus is considered to be a hero is because he continuously stands up for what he believes in. Secondly, it is clear that Brutus is a hero because he kills himself as a sacrifice to the roman public.
There are two characters in the play who killed Caesar for different purposes: one for the good of himself, one for the good of others. Shakespeare criticized selfish people in society by comparing Brutus with Cassius. Cassius murdered Caesar for his own personal benefit; he didn’t consider the happiness of the citizens and brought a destructive civil war. On the other hand, Brutus is a noble man; he considered the happiness of others and tried to save Rome from being ruled by a dictator. According to the play, we should have more concern on others and consider the group