1. The article that I found is about how the Federal Government was denied the ability to ban women from wearing their niquabs during a citizenship ceremony. The ban on niquabs was first brought to light when a Muslim woman from Pakistan named Zunera Ishaq tried to get Canadian citizenship, but she was unable to do so due to her unwillingness to remove her niquab. In the federal court ruling between the dispute amidst Zunera Ishaq and the government, Judge Keith Boswell stated that denying Zunera Ishaq her right to wear a niquab during her Canadian citizenship ceremony violates her freedom of religion. It was ruled that Zunera Ishaq was allowed to complete the ceremony while wearing her niquab. While not agreeing with the ruling, Defence Minister
Citation R. v. NS, 2012 SCC 72, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 726 – Niqab removal trial Facts: NS who is a Muslim woman made a complaint of being sexually assaulted by 2 men within family during her childhood. Both men were charged for the assault in 2007. During the opening inquiry in 2008, NS explained she was going to testify with her niqab on for religious purposes Legal issue Removing the witness’s niqab violates section 2 of the Canadian charter of rights and freedom Decision The Supreme Court dismissed the plea and is preparing a list of questions in order to decide whether or not the witness should be allowed to wear the niqab during the trail for religious purposes
However, with the government of Mackenzie King’s decision to undergo these interments between 1941 and 1949, it is exceptionally clear that this reputation had been shattered, especially with his decision to deport many citizens to occupied Japan starting in 1946. Rao also notes, “The novel in fact problematizes the discourses of ‘official multiculturalism’ which sanctioned Canada as a 'cultural mosaic,' and underscores how in actual fact such policy glossed over the centrality of race in multicultural Canada. Multiculturalism simply ignored ethnicity and it was used to strengthen the dominance of Canada's two major cultures.” (Rao 2004) Basically, Canada’s multicultural society
We consider the U.S. to be the melting pot of people/cultures, but Minster Trudeau claims that Canada has a higher rate of foreign-born citizens than the U.S. Harper wanted to Ban the niqab, which is a face veil that some Muslim women wear at public ceremonies. Harper hoping that the people would assimilate to their culture. It seems even in Canada that there has been a push of fear over Islam/Muslim immigrants. Minster Trudeau took the stance of embracing the Muslim immigrants that want to live in their country. He wanted his people to know that everyone can make a country great no matter what they believe
There are many strength of the NIBRS, many of which outnumber the weaknesses. An important strength is its wide range of crimes it 's able to collect, ranging from terrorism, hate crimes, and abuse of the elderly. This allows for for information to be collected. which in itself makes it a better system then the Summary reporting system. Other strengths include its availability to more people with its higher amount of information, more reliable data, and how it allows agencies to work together for similar cases.
The success of Hunter Tootoo in winning his riding can ultimately be condensed to the efforts of the Liberal party. Tootoo had previously run in the 1997 federal election, however, as an NDP candidate (Zerehi, 2015). Moreover, he was the only unilingual candidate running in a bilingual riding where the inability to speak Inuktitut should have alienated him from Indigenous voters (Ibid). Tootoo's scattered political history and inability to communicate with a significant portion of his constituents put him at a disadvantage. It can only be concluded that voters were making their decisions based on political party association.
Canada has mistreated its Indigenous people for centuries. The Indian Act (1876) is just one of many ways the government forced their colonial ways of life onto the Indigenous people already living here. It was extremely sexist and gave the Indigenous people very little rights. Bill C-31: The Act to Amend the Indian Act, also known as the new Indian Act, was introduced in April of 1985 by the Canadian government to address the issues regarding discrimination within the Indian Act. The government created this bill with the intention to emphasize equality and give Indigenous communities more self-governing rights.
Significance of Constitution Act of 1982 Canada has earned the title of being a peacemaking nation which is well deserved and known in the international community. It supports equality among everyone, protects and guarantees the rights of its citizens, and is considered a role model for protection of human rights around the world. However in Canada’s history, it’s society was once filled with prejudice and there were many discriminatory laws. This was evident in many historical events such as the mistreatment of the First Nations people, and the unfair Chinese Immigration Acts. Those laws had a very negative significant impact on the people.
“Canada: New Bill Prohibits Religious Symbols for Public-Sector Workers in Quebec.” The Library of Congress, The Library of Congress, 6 Aug. 2019, https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2019-08-06/canada-new-bill-prohibits-religious-symbols-for-public-sector-workers-in-quebec/. Government Of Canada, Statistics Canada. Most Common Ethnic or Cultural Origins Reported in Quebec, Government of Canada, 26 Oct. 2022, https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/221026/g-b003-eng.htm. Government, Québec. “Bill 21, an Act Respecting the Laicity of the State.”
According to the author’s opinion Canadian Muslim women feel the most targeted leading this to be the main issues as it is states for any head wear such as niqab or burka covering the face to be removed when receiving public services regarding identification (Shingler, 2017). Despite, the author being able to relate to the controversial topic he is able to incorporate statements from those who are not in favor of the new bill. In summary, CBC News author Benjamin Shingler uses statements from Quebec’s government and Muslim Canadians grasping a better understanding of both viewpoints. As a result, the issue seen is being examined through a micro-level as looking beyond a problem and looks at cause and effect for individuals throughout society.
This case was about a Muslim girl (Samantha Elauf) trying to get a job at Abercrombie and Fitch. She wore a hijab to her interview like every other day. The look policy for Abercrombie bans caps and black clothes. She was not accepted to work in Abercrombie since she wore a hijab to her interview which lowered her scored. Abercrombie never asked if her headscarf was to practice her religion, but neither did Elauf mention it was for religious reasons.
I think that the most significant weakness is that the NIBRS is one of the more detailed databases in the fact that it tracks for useful information like offenders with multiple offenses or multiple victims, however it is highly under reported. NIBRS was designed to improve the weakness that occur within the UCR, nevertheless if nobody is reporting to the database it cannot improve. According to Terry (2013), “Currently, police departments representing only 17 percent of the population submit data to NIBRS” (pg. 11). That is a huge weakness that only 17% report to NIBRS.
The protest led to awareness and acknowledgment of the initial treaties and agreements. To what extent has the federal government affirmed collective rights in the legislation over time? Canada is different than any other country, including the United States, because of our collective rights. The purpose of them is so different groups of people can have an identity. Which overall, would create a diverse society with many identities which people can be a part of.
In addition to that the Prime Minister emphasizes the importance of working together by stating that a catastrophic war can only be solved when rules, that protect norms and human rights, are set in agreement of the
In Joan Wallach Scott book “The Politics of The Veil” she talks about how France passed a law to ban women from wearing Veils. Throughout her introduction Scott tends to take stance against the France government meaning she doesn’t approve the the law that ban veil. I think this reading represents an excellent research about how unfair the france politicians are to a certain religion. To prove her argument she presented how different religions were treated, for instance from the reading she conveyed the jewish boys wear the skullcaps and sikh boys wear turbans, and the muslim girls wear hijab however she highlights even though the same rule tend to apply of them however the france government tends to undergo the other religions and
The French headscarf controversy reached its peak when, in 2004, the French parliament passed a law banning conspicuous religious clothing from school classrooms. This law and the controversy surrounding the wearing of hijabs, veils, and headscarfs by muslim schoolgirls can trace its immediate root to 1989 when a principal in Creil expelled three girls for refusing to remove the garment in the school. This starting point still neglects the influence of France’s colonial past and her struggle to absorb immigrants from former colonial holdings — especially the predominately muslim Algeria — and the impact of racist remnants of colonial sentiment on modern political and cultural dialog surrounding immigrants. The controversy also served as a rock on which the Front National, a radically right French political party, and its followers were able to create and promote a