The OJ Simpson murder case was a criminal trial held at the Los Angeles County Superior Court, in which former NFL player OJ Simpson was tried on two counts of murder for the death of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend, Ron Goldman. He was found not guilty even though there were numerous counts of evidence that showed that OJ was the one who killed his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and Ron Goldman. OJ Simpson should have been guilty of murdering Nicole because there was DNA evidence, he had dreams of killing Nicole Simpson, and jealousy could have been the motive that led him to kill Nicole. There was blood found at the crime scene that traced back to OJ’s DNA. Marcia Clark, the lead prosecutor of the murder case, revealed that a blood drop found near the bodies of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman has been linked to OJ Simpson through RFLP testing - the highest level of DNA examination, commonly known as a genetic fingerprint. “Experts say that RFLP - or restriction fragment length polymorphism testing - can indicate at least a 999,999 chance in a million that two samples are from one person” (Caruso & Hester). This quote just shows just how very accurate RFLP was and with this highly accurate DNA test, it traced back to OJ’s DNA. …show more content…
Simpson and her friend Ronald L. Goldman were killed. Referring to OJ Simpson, Mr.Shipp testified about a conversation between him and Simpson. Shipp reported that OJ jokingly said, ¨ ¨To be honest, Shipp, I’ve had some dreams of killing her” ¨(Noble). Mr.Shipp’s testimony just revealed an outright confession from OJ Simpson. It can be inferred that OJ was feeling guilty about killing his ex-wife Nicole Simpson and so he had to get it off his chest by confessing to his longtime friend, Ron Shipp, in a jokingly way because he was in denial that he committed the
The case of O.J SimpsonTopic: The case of O.J Simpson Question: was he guilty Thesis: i think that he was guilty for his crime Orenthal James Simpson or also known as O.J. Simpson was accused of murdering his own wife on June 19941. He had to go to court with one of his good friends his name was Robert kardashian. Robert kardashian was his defense attorney he was the guy that saved O.J. Simpson from going to jail. Well not being guilty of murder that night. The trial happened between November 9 1994 to October 3 1995.
O.J. Simpson O.J. Simpson was born in 1947 in San Francisco, California. He became a college football superstar at USC and later enjoyed a record-setting career in the NFL. OJ Simpson gained fame as an American football star and, later, as a actor. He married Nicole Brown five years after retiring from the sport in 1985.
It was a calm night in the peaceful neighborhood of Brentwood on June 12, 1994. That is until neighbors reported hearing a dog barking around 10:15 pm. A man by the name of Sukru Boztepe notice the dog, and when approached to inspect it, he saw it had red spots on its paw. These spots were soon traced back to Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman. Mr. Boztepe discovered the bodies of the individuals outside Nicole’s estate on June 13, 1994, at 12:10 am.
Simpson got the best lawyers in the country to defend him. During his opening statement, Johnnie Cochran said that Simpson was home alone during the murders, golfing. The prosecution had tons of evidence, including DNA evidence. Prosecutors said that the DNA matched Simpson's blood to samples from the murder scene. They said they found the victims' blood in his car, and glove and on a sock at his home.
The Unexpected Life Of O.J Simpson Hi we are the parents of Ron Goldman and in this story I would be writing about the murder trial of my son and his friend Nicole Brown. They were both murdered in 1994 in the house of Nicole Brown in Los Angeles, the suspect was the homeowner O.J Simpson but when police got their he wasn’t there was a manhunt for him in his white Bronco truck. First we would be talking about O.J Simpson life before this happened.
As we all know, O.J. Simpson was acquitted. The court had ten out of twelve jurors find Simpson not guilty. One reason he was acquitted, was because the glove found at the scene did not fit. It simply would not go on Simpson’s hand.
Orenthal James Simpson, known as "O.J. Simpson". Born in San Francisco California on July 9 in 1947. He was a former American football player. Since 1985, he was a member of the Hall of Fame. He was not only a football player; he was also an actor and television presenter.
OJ Simpson was a very achieved person player until he made one big mistake. The trial of OJ Simpson was a long stressful process to prove a star innocent or guilty of murder. This took Place in the state of California on October 3, 1995. OJ was tried for a murder crime of his ex-wife and another man. In the end OJ turned out to be not guilty of this crime.
25 Apr. 2017. User, Super. " The Trial of Orenthal James Simpson: An Account. "
He told jurors "If he couldn’t have her didn’t want anybody else to have her." Marcia Clark stated the facts proving Simpson's guilt that they established during the trial (Linder 7). Marcia Clark was the chief prosecutor (Goldberg). Johnnie Cochran was Simpson's lead attorney, who said the opening statement for the defense. He stated a timeline of events that didn't add up also that it was no way that OJ couldn't have pulled off a double murder with the arthritis that he has.
“Former American football star and actor O.J. Simpson was famously acquitted for the murders of his ex-wife and her friend following a high-profile 1995 criminal trial” (biography.com editors).O.J. Simpson began his fame playing football at the high school level. His high school team name was the Galileo Lions. Located in San Francisco. Then later in his life he was charged with the murder of his ex-wife and her friend. He eventually went to trial.
OJ Simpson is Indeed Innocent “If it doesn’t fit, you have to acquit,” this quote said by one of OJ Simpson’s attorneys, Johnny Cochran, is widely known for its impact on the controversial case of OJ Simpson. From 1994-1995 OJ Simpson was known as one of the most controversial cases in the USA due to the verdict that OJ was innocent of the murders of his ex wife and one of her friends. On June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman met an untimely demise, and the only suspect the police ever reviewed was OJ Simpson. OJ was later caught in a low speed chase in a white Ford Bronco before being taken into custody and put on trial. In the sensationally controversial court case involving OJ Simpson as a suspect for murder, The innocent ruling
It was the summer of 1994, when we first heard about the OJ Simpson case, and the media quickly dubbed it “The Trial of the Century”. OJ, the football legend, OJ, the actor, and eventually, OJ, the convicted felon was acquitted in the killings of his former wife and friend. He was later found guilty in the civil trial. In the early hours of June 13, 1994 a neighbor finds the bodies of ex -wife Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman outside of Simpson’s apartment in the Brentwood estates in Los Angeles California. The police suspect former NFL legend O.J. Simpson with the grisly deaths.
Simpson wrote a book called If I Did It: Confessions of the Killer. He talks about his marriage and how bad his ex-wife was, that she was an instigator that had a drug problem. He had claim that, he used to beat her because she was always cheating him. In his book, he had said “If she wanted to take herself down that was one thing, but I wasn’t going let her take me down with her.’’ O.J goes in great details about the killing, in chapter 6 of his book, he talks about that he wanted to talk to Nicole but instead had a run in with Ron Goldman.
was able to be convicted after a series of evidence was collected against him. There was a significant amount of DNA evidence that was found both at the crime scene and Simpson’s home that suggested he was involved with the murder. Blood samples were found on a sock in Simpson’s home that matched that of Nicole. Additionally blood was found inside of O.J.’s Ford Bronco, which he had ran from the authorities in. Much of the DNA evidence was questionable, as the defence pressed that it had not been collected properly.