I think your analysis is solid. I agree that upon Peter’s death, Martin is the sole property owner. I like how you pointed out that the gesture to transfer Peter’s property to Andrew “contradicts the legal agreement of joint tenancy.”
I think there is validity to your assertions that Otis is a trespasser and for Martin to start the eviction process. I also like the suggestion of pursuing a lease with Otis. However, I believe that Otis may actually have ownership of the property regarding adverse possession. According to North Carolina General Statues § 1-40 (2014) “[n]o action for the recovery or possession of real property…shall be maintained when the person in possession thereof…has possessed the property under known and visible lines and boundaries adversely to all other persons for 20 years…” (North Carolina General Assembly, 2014a). Therefore, Martin’s lack of visitation to the property in a 20 year span of time adversely gave Otis possession of the parcel since he has claimed to have lived there for “some 20 years”. Obviously, a court would have to adjudicate.
…show more content…
As Guidry and Do (1998) pointed out “...owners of such proeprties [sic] may see the action of taking as unjust…” (p. 232). Clearly, Martin was agitated at the eminent domain claim. Although the city offered to pay fair market value, I believe the city intent to use the property was not in compliance with North Carolina General Statues § 40A-3 (2014) which spelled out specific examples that land could be seized for public enterprises (North Carolina General Assembly, 2014b). From the case study information, the city’s intent was for a private venture – not a public
1. Local residents from the rural area of Thibodaux plan to sue McIntry Realty because of their plans to redevelop a local farm to accommodate five hundred homes. Hector Salvador, attorney for the residents, plans to file suit against Eugene McIntry because McIntry possible violated their rights. McIntry plans to counter-sue the city if they interfere with his plans to redevelop the land.
Agnes Maples, 90, would have been forced to pay hefty fines of up to $2,500 per day if she did not get her property cleaned up. Her neighbors had complained about the messy yard, but little did they know, it wasn't actually Maples' mess. A relative of the elderly widow's had been storing his belongings and dumping his trash in her yard for years. When the city decided to take action against Maples, she tried to get her relative to move his junk, but he would not remove it and the task proved to be too difficult for Maples to do on her own.
Discussion Board Forum 2 Case Study Martin has decided to retire after he spent many years as a deputy police officer in a small town in North Carolina and as a detective in Raleigh. During his years as an officer of the law and order, he deiced to invest in some properties in the state. One of the properties is in the blue ridge mountains in North Carolina and the other real estate is on the North Carolina coast. The real property at the mountain was purchased 31 years ago as a joint tenancy with a right of survivorship with his friends. The second property located on the North Carolina coast is been taken by eminent domain by city authorities to make space for new development and business around the area.
The government of the United states sold some portion of the land to William M’Intosh (defendant) about 35 years later. Johnson filed an action to eject M’Intosh from the land Rule Land title transfers are only valid when made under the rule of the currently prevailing government. Holding (Marshall, J.) No. The plaintiffs do not exhibit a title which can be sustained in the Courts of the United States and that there is no error in the judgment
Issue Whether the land title conveyed from the Indian tribes to private persons prior to the American Revolution is accepted in a United States court? Facts Joshua Johnson (plaintiff) inherited a tract of land from his father, who bought the land from the Piankeshaw Indians prior to the American Revolution at which time the Piankeshaw Indians lived on the land. The county of Illinois in which the land was located was created by the State of Virginia after the Declaration of Independence. The land was then conveyed to the United States government by the Virginia delegates to Congress.
August 14, 2015 FTF with Ms. Cheryl Whited by Caseworker Cheryl Pellette Ms. Whited stated Ms. Bradford and Katie will be living at the residence. She has helped Ms. Bradford on the years. She has noticed Ms. Bradford change of focus. Ms. Whited stated Ms. Bradford is in the process of terminating her parental rights to Skyla and Mia. Ms. Whited stated Ms. Bradford shouldn't be around Mr. Clawson or her other friends which are a bad influence.
Around 1735 Governor Penn suggested that this “Walking Purchase” be used to settle a dispute over land that the Pennsylvania government said had been sold in 1696 and 1697. The Delaware denied that the
Driven by the belief that space was bequeathed to them, the Native Americans feel justified in defending their land against the growing encroachment of the white man as the American landscape unfolds. Their motive is the premise that a higher authority has granted them the right to the space, and that the Great Spirit has created the landscape exclusively for them. Fueled by the formation of conflict over land, the Great Ottawa Chief, Pontiac, in his speech at Detroit, seeks to persuade the tribes, including the Ottawa, Huron, and Pottawatomi to agree to resistance. Invoking the words of the Delaware prophet, Neolin, Pontiac recounts the vision which he believes justifies resistance. Neolin urges the tribes to sever all relations to the customs
This evidence supports my subclaim because the original amount of land that the Cherokee Nation owned was taken away over time by white settlers. Document 2, “Cherokee Nation of Indians, Letter to Congress, February 22, 1838. Printed in The Vermont Telegraph newspaper on April 4, 1838” is the most reliable document showing discrimination because it was written by members of the Cherokee tribe who clearly state forms if
Under Missouri Law, it is likely that the building is an inhabitable structure and the defendant, Chip Whitehead, could be charged with Burglary in the First Degree. Under Missouri Statutes, a building is inhabitable “where people assemble
If Jacobs hangs for a witch he forfeit up his property-that's law! And there is none but Putnam with the coin to buy so great a piece. This man is killing his neighbors for their land.” (Miller 1195). People were willing to do anything for their own gain, including take land that is not theirs.
Well after reading through these articles especially the 5 whys and root cause analysis was very interesting and has given me new insights into conflict and problem solving, I wish I had known this a while back, and would have helped my friend and his family, anyways here is what happened to them My friend and his family moved to a new house which had a very nice landscaping and garden and the area is located in wooded section, the previous owner took good care of the landscaping, my friends family consisted of 2 children and they also had a dog, after some months they started seeing bad patches in the yard and found out that the dog was digging the lawn, they were dismayed to find that the dog was responsible for doing this to the lawn they
Suppose further that the putative dog is actually a robot dog so perfect that it could not be distinguished from an actual dog by vision alone. James does not know that such robot dogs exist; a Japanese toy manufacturer has only recently developed them, and what James sees is a prototype that is used for testing the public's response. Given these assumptions, (5) is of course false. But suppose further that just a few feet away from the robot dog, there is a real dog, concealed from James's view. Given this further assumption, James's belief in (5) is true.
Tukey was an investor on real estate property of lot 4 between J and K streets and Fourth and Fifth streets in Sacramento. The third that was in the possession of Judson and George B. Haycock was sold to Mills. During which time, the taxes had not been paid on the property. The sheriff in Sacramento was deeded to sell the property to recoup the money owed. Tukey, in having failed to pay the taxes, forced the property to be sold and left a loan of $4000.00 to Mill’s
“What authority or call I had to pretend to be judge and executioner upon these men as criminals, whom Heaven had thought fit for so many ages to suffer unpunished to go on, and to be, as it were, the executioners of His judgments one upon another.” Pg. 171. People are entitled to their Property. The Land that belongs to whomever has improved it the most gets to have ownership.