Paul Washer Rhetorical Analysis

1573 Words7 Pages

Paul Washer delivers a dire appeal to the Christian pastors and church leaders that have been believing and teaching a false gospel. He lists ten indictments against the modern Church system in America. His first indictment, that he explained, was about the denial of the sufficiency of scripture. Paul told the audience about how the social sciences have taken precedent over the Bible and have become a primary influence in the churches. He questioned, if the Bible is sufficient or do we have to bring in every so called social science and cultural study in order to know how to run a church? In my opinion, I think that the Bible is sufficient and I also do believe that he is correct about the fact that many churches turn to social experts when they cannot figure out something, which causes many problems. In summary, the churches should not rely on the spiritually dead, but rather on the Word of God that’s been proven time and time again to be sufficient.

An ignorance of God, is the second indictment that Paul Washer explains. He used his past story to share an example of what he meant about the subject. Paul later went on to …show more content…

Being very direct he describes, that telling a random stranger that God loves you is not biblical evangelism. Although, God loves them and the people should know that, they should also know the details. Paul provided a question for evangelist to ask instead, “Is the Holy Spirit so at work in your heart through the preaching of the gospel that a change has been wrought so that the sin you once loved you now hate and the sin you once desired to embrace?Do you want to go to heaven?” The idea to ask more direct questions rather than saying God loves you,say this prayer, now you will go to heaven is something that I can fully agree with. Paul put into perspective of how to talk to someone who is not a believer and provided

Open Document