ipl-logo

Personal Narrative: A Juror's Trial

389 Words2 Pages

It was a very hot summer day. I remember one of the jurors talking about how it was a record breaking day. I was tired and a bit tense. I hated doing things in the heat. I mean, who would ever want to work in the heat, especially when a person’s life is at stake? I thought to myself, how will I get through the day with all this heat? I couldn’t even properly listen to the case in the courtroom. I had a feeling that this trial would end very fast. First, we all took a vote. I was pretty sure that everyone would vote guilty. However, I was wrong. That darn Juror 8. He got on my nerve. I could have went home and rested, but he had to vote guilty.I wanted to know why he would vote not guilty. Then when I asked, you wouldn’t believe what he said

Show More
Related

  • Oj Simpson Murder Case Essay

    1157 Words  | 5 Pages

    There were many things that pointed to the fact that it looked like O.J. did it but, when asked at his arraignment what he plead

    Read More

  • What Does Juror 4 Mean

    519 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ultimately, this leads to Juror 4 and Juror 8 to use their wits and reasoning to persuade the other jurors to choose between “guilty,” or “not guilty.” In the drama Twelve Angry Men, Rose indirectly characterizes Juror #4 as reasonable, in order

    Read More

  • Examples Of Dialectical Journal For Night By Elie Wiesel

    786 Words  | 4 Pages

    The police were taking roll calls, once, twice, twenty times. The heat was oppressive. Sweat streamed from people’s faces and bodies. Children were crying for water. Water!

    Read More

  • Jurors Jury Duty

    443 Words  | 2 Pages

    The jury system continued to evolve over a period of time and eventually the United States Constitution was written to govern the jury system. The Sixth and Seventh Amendments stated that we should have 12 members and the cases were to be resolved upon a unanimous verdict (Landsman & Holderman2010). In the 1970’s the court approved juries of 12 or fewer and a non-unanimous verdict in civil cases in federal court cases. Since the evolution of the judicial system it has become easier to get jurors to come to court to do their civil duty. A list is compiled of selected jurors from voter registration and driver’s license information from the state (United States Courts, n.d.).

    Read More

  • The Evidence Of Steven Avery's Trial

    431 Words  | 2 Pages

    Because of this, Kratz was accused of speaking in an unprofessional manner. Furthermore, as the trial approached an end, the juries have their final debate. The board did not come up with an immediate decision, so the court had to wait until the next day to do so. When this court day arrived, one of the jurors had to leave for a family emergency.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson: Not Guilty Of Crimes Against Humanity

    1737 Words  | 7 Pages

    After three days of Jackson on trial, the jury has decided that the defendant, Mr. Andrew Jackson was not guilty of crimes against humanity. The vote was very close though, Andrew won by a hair, with the votes being 5 versus 3. The jury found that even though the prosecution proved Jackson was a bad man, he did not commit the crimes against humanity. I decisively voted for the defendant’s side. I could’ve been the deciding factor on if Jackson is hanged or if he’s spared.

    Read More

  • Twelve Angry Men: Comparing The Book And Film

    726 Words  | 3 Pages

    When asked why he voted not guilty, juror eight stated “Look, this boy has been kicked around all his life. You know---living in a slum, his mother dead since he was nine. He spent a year in and a half in an orphanage while his father served a jail term for forgery. That’s not a very good head start. He’s had a pretty terrible sixteen years.

    Read More

  • Peer Pressure In Reginald Rose's 12 Angry Men

    1247 Words  | 5 Pages

    While all of the other men have changed their vote to a not guilty verdict, the third jurors remains with his original belief. Even in the very end of the play, he acts hostile against the others trying to change his mind, in saying “Do you think I’m an idiot or something?” (Rose 72). One juror that seems almost impervious to argumentative fallacies and peer pressure is Juror 8. Juror almost displays the ideal juror, and the rest tend to mimic the flaws of the system.

    Read More

  • Ethos, Pathos, Pathos And Logos In 12 Angry Men

    1964 Words  | 8 Pages

    What is worth our attention in this movie is how in the beginning they are trying to convince each other to vote guilty. 11 juror voted guilty and only one voted not guilty. Their judgments were based upon either their past personal experience which created their thoughts and behavior or upon facts. Juror 8 represents the conscience. He stood up for his inner feelings that the accused young boy is innocent.

    Read More

  • Juror 3 Character Analysis Essay

    980 Words  | 4 Pages

    Juror 2: He is an introvert who works as a bank clerk. Meek and high in agreeableness, he cannot hold an opinion of his own and adopts the opinion of the last person who has spoken. He seemed happy when he managed to help during the timing of recreating the ‘old man walking’ scene.

    Read More

  • Fallacies In 12 Angry Men

    1404 Words  | 6 Pages

    The script introduces the viewers to the typical behavior and the state of mind of these jurors, who surprisingly turn out to be the last to change their opinions from “guilty” to “not guilty”. Juror#3 the frustrated father whose personal conflicts and experiences influence his view of the accused’s crime is very desperate to make it clear that his mind is already made up before the deliberations even start. Similar

    Read More

  • Minority Influence In 12 Angry Men

    1458 Words  | 6 Pages

    This movie is the best example of minority influence where in the earlier stage only one juror no. 8 says defendant is not guilty but in the end of the movie we see that he is able to influence all the jurors in a very logical manner which I am going to point out later so that all the jurors lastly says the defendant is not guilty. Minority influence is more likely to occur if the point of view of the minority is consistent, flexible, and appealing to the majority. The juror no. 8 doesn’t know defendant is guilty or not guilty but he has only doubt in his mind which he trying to clear during the entire film and with which he also able to clear the views of other

    Read More

  • Reasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men

    1011 Words  | 5 Pages

    This is an important element when deciding who the best and worst jurors were. There were no facts as to who was right or wrong because we didn’t see the crime in question. All

    Read More

  • The Justice System In Twelve Angry Men

    591 Words  | 3 Pages

    Therefore, he tried to make the trial go faster by voting with the side with the most votes. My family in the real world also had to go through inconvenience of the jury duty. My cousin had her first prom and my Aunt got called for jury duty. She couldn’t help her daughter do her hair, makeup, and get pictures. My moms friend also had a conflict with the jury duty.

    Read More

  • 12 Angry Men Case Study

    858 Words  | 4 Pages

    In a New York City, an 18-year-old male from a slum is on a trial claiming that he is responsible for his father death by stabbing him After both sides has finished their closing argument in the trial, the judge asks the jury to decide whether the boy is guilty or not The judge informs the jury decided the boy is guilty, he will face a death sentence as a result of this trial The jurors went into the private room to discuss about this case. At the first vote, all jurors vote guilty apart from Juror 8 (Henry Fonda), he was the only one who voted “Note Guilty” Juror 8 told other jurors that they should discuss about this case before they put a boy into a death sentence

    Read More

More about Personal Narrative: A Juror's Trial

Open Document