This a letter to the news media and to the people that have been covering the antiwar movement. There are many versions of what’s having currently happened at the university that’s being covered, but not all of it right because of their many different versions. The war has been going for 9 years and it’s been seen the news has started showing all the gruesome things. My stand on the campus unrest because the importance of ending the war, why I believe my position is superior to those held by other groups, and why I have taken the stand. My stand on the campus unrest because of the importance of ending the war in Vietnam. I want my first amendment as an American to be heard and to have a voice about the war. The news coverage of the war is
This paper will be discussing how the Vietnam war and Kent state shooting tie together and how it affected lives afterwards. The Kent State Shooting on May 4, 1970 was a culmination of the anti war movement because Four Kent state students were killed protesting the invasion of Cambodia during the Vietnam war. The Vietnam war was fought between North and South Vietnam. The United States, along with other countries such as the Philippines were on the side of South Vietnam.
1) A spate of anti-war activism occurred across the Le Moyne campus during the years of the Vietnam War from the late 1960s into the early 1970s. Such activism included protests against the Kent State shooting and against President Nixon and anti-draft demonstrations. Still, the Le Moyne community wasn’t entire unified behind the anti-war movement. There is a tendency to caricature college campuses during the Vietnam War as having a unified, passionate anti-war movement across the entire campus. In reality, however, not everybody in the Le Moyne community supported the anti-war activism; some viewed the protests as un-patriotic and unnecessarily subversive.
Today we see a lot of protesting and opinions being stated all over social media. In the late 1960s the United States started to get involved in the Vietnam War, which started a lot of protests because people did not want to fight in a war that mainly did not concern them. In 1968, David O’Brien wanted to express his disapproval of the war (United States v. O’Brien). So, while standing outside the Boston Courthouse, he decided to burn his drafting card in front of quite a few people (United States v. O’Brien). He did this so he could exercise his first amendment right, which is the freedom of speech and/or press (United States v. O’Brien).
To better understand campus crime, one needs to realize that it involves several contexts—the legal, the social, and the security—and that each context is interrelated with the others (Fisher & Sloan, 2007). The legal context involves judicial and legislative efforts to address campus crime, including institutional liability for on-campus victimizations and Congressional and state legislative efforts to address the problem. The social context involves efforts to develop more accurate measures of the extent and nature of campus crime, identify its major correlates, and understand better its temporal and spatial distribution. Finally, the security context involves not only law enforcement and security efforts to reduce or prevent crime on campus,
On the 110th birthday of Adolf Hitler on April 20th, 1999, the most notorious school shooting in America occurred. Eric Harris and Dylan Kelbold shot and killed 12 of their peers as well as a teacher at Columbine high school in Littleton, Colorado. The tragic event sent shockwaves across America and lead to massive changes in public school safety. Serious discussions of having SROs (School Resource Officers) at every school and combating gun rights were some main takeaways people had after Columbine. These issues, however, were not the way shootings like Columbine could have been prevented.
Government Regulation: The Frist Amendment & College Campuses Without a doubt college campuses attract a number of different groups. Many advocates, religious groups, hate groups, and individuals come to college campuses in hopes of expressing their opinion to impressionable college students. Under the First Amendment of the United States the Federal Government (and as applied to state governments under the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause) the freedom of speech and religions is freely allowed to expressed without restraint by the federal government. Again, everyone has a first amendment right to free speech. First Amendment issues constantly arise on college campuses, but free speech on college campuses have long been a medium in young
The 1960’s and early 1970’s was a period when America was involved in many conflicts overseas, including the Vietnam War. This began a time when media spread quickly as well as influenced the public heavily and wars were first televised. These conflicts ultimately caused citizens to protest and question the motives of the federal government. A large number of these protestors were students who sought to combat problems through various tactics to get authority figures to remedy the problems they identified. Student protestors sought to combat many immediate and long-term problems involving this time period and the Vietnam War.
The first Amendment declares, “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…” However, after the Espionage Act was passed, during World War 1, Schenck was arrested for violating this Act by printing 50,000 leaflets that contradicted the war and the draft. As illustrated, U.S. citizens should be granted the ability to protest wars and drafts since it violates the first Amendment’s right to free speech. The Supreme Court made an invalid choice.
In 1970, several hundred colleges and universities experienced strikes. This sentiment was not limited to home, even soldiers carried the same mentality. They experimented with drugs, openly wore peace symbols, and disobeyed the command of their superior officers. The decline in discipline was a sign that the United States must leave Vietnam. Public support for the war was not helped by a publication that detailed the My Lai Massacre.
One group that joined the March on the Pentagon was a group of communication students and their instructor. a. Thomas Benson and Bonnie Johnson explained that the students and their instructor participated to sympathize with marchers and to relate their class to a world event. b. The students' class focused on historic public addresses, race relations in the U.S., war versus peace, and communication. c. Students observed the demonstration at the Lincoln Memorial. i.
Some believed the war should be fought because of the fight against communism and seen the resisting students and young men as traitors committing treason against the country. The young students that were being drafted strongly believed that the draft was endangering their freedom and Nation’s security. These young people became violent and resulting in violence by the police retaliating back. This was the first major broadcasting of this violence. These shocking videos released showed the country how divided the United States was.
It also says that the government has the right to make certain things private or classified. This is often expressed in the college campus because of the latest growth in social media. The first amendment is infringed upon everyday due to social media and the fact that there are so many posts that the government cannot manage it
We’re able to express our political beliefs without being fearful that we might get sent to jail. Without this amendment, we wouldn 't be able to speak up for ourselves against the government whenever we
The topic for my paper is the issue of whether guns should be permitted on college campuses. After reading many of the articles in the New York Times I have come to a conclusion or better to say liked one of the articles more than the others. The article is called, “ guns on campuses makes the college less safe” by Javier Auyero. The second amendment states the right of the people to keep and bear arms. Every human should have the opportunity to protect themselves, but that doesn 't mean having a gun would do that.
Illegal or iniquitous? That is the question many are asking in regards to current news of NCAA. Decades of indistinct unethical and deceitful behavior from the NCAA has come to a halt as of September 26, 2017 when charges were announced, light is being shed on the NCAA scandal that not only involves college athletes and their families but also coaches, financial advisors and executives. The scandal deals with corruption, fraud, and bribery schemes. It is known that 25 percent of the teams ranked in the top sixteen are linked to the ongoing corruption investigation led by the U.S attorney’s office in New York.