Pros And Cons Of Stricter Gun Control Laws

Stricter Gun Control Laws: A Safer Society
The debate over gun control has been a longstanding issue in the United States. With the rising number of mass shootings and gun violence, stricter gun control laws have become a topic of discussion. The question remains, would stricter gun control laws be better for society? This essay will argue that stricter gun control laws would indeed be better for society. The first two body paragraphs will present evidence supporting the argument, while the third will explore a counterargument and provide a refutation.
Pro 1: Reducing Gun Violence
One of the main arguments in favor of stricter gun control laws is that they would reduce gun violence. In countries like Australia and Japan, which have strict gun control laws, the number of gun-related deaths is significantly lower than in the United States. In Australia, for example, there

In many cases of gun violence, the shooter had a history of mental illness or a criminal record that should have prevented them from obtaining a firearm. By requiring more thorough background checks, the likelihood of someone with a history of violence or mental illness obtaining a firearm would be reduced.
Con: Second Amendment Rights
The primary argument against stricter gun control laws is that they infringe upon the Second Amendment rights of Americans. However, it is important to note that the Second Amendment was written in a time when guns were far less powerful than they are today. The founding fathers could not have imagined the type of weapons that are now readily available to the public. Additionally, the Second Amendment does not give Americans an unlimited right to own any type of weapon they want. It is the responsibility of the government to regulate and ensure the safety of its citizens.
Refutation: Criminals Will Still Obtain