The Consideration of Race in Adoption Should adoption social workers first try to place a child within a family of the same race and culture? It is this that makes it almost impossible for a black family to adopt a white child (Maxwell). Adoption is a legal process by which people take a child who is not born to them as their own son or daughter. Most adoptions take place when children are young. According to Adoption and Race, “Overall, however, adoptions are declining. Instead, more children are being placed in foster care these days, due to the foster care grant. The department also lacks accredited social workers,” (“Adoption and Race”). Families considering adoption first need to agree (particularly the mom and dad) that it is something …show more content…
For these reasons, many adoption agencies offer incentives to families willing to adopt black children, including subsidies to make the process more affordable (Dunham). No family should be given a ‘subsidy’ for adopting a black child. If they cannot adopt a black child, then they are not ready to be parents. The outcomes for children adopted by parents of a different race are positive. With affordable and easier adoption processes, more children will have lovely adopted parents more quickly. There is a significantly higher amount of ethnic, or non-white, children that need to be adopted. This creates a win-win situation for both the parents and the child because the child can be placed with their new family much faster. Whites who understand the significance of race, and who are otherwise qualified, should be permitted to adopt black children (Maxwell). If a white family is willing to learn and understand what it means to be a certain race, then they should be allowed to adopt black children. If whites could just adopt black children, then the interracially adoption will be quick and black children will have homes quicker. Some prospective parents wait three years or more for children of the same race (“Adoption and …show more content…
The more awareness that intercultural adoptive parents have, as well as a willingness to act on behalf of their child, the better prepared the growing child will be to live as an adult in a society where heritage still matters (Ramos). When a family adopts a transracial child, it helps them open to the racial issues around them. Interracial adoption gives homeless children a better home and family. In 1994, Congress passed the Multiethnic Placement Act, or MEPA, to ban race matching, thereby barring agencies from routinely presuming that same-race placements are in the best interests of children (Wagner). Adoption agencies should focus on the interest of the child and getting the child a happy home. Race matching in adoption delays the adoption processes. Even worse, some agencies continue to race-match even when it means pulling children away from different-race families to whom they have bonded (Wagner). White parents can learn to deal with racism, especially if it concerns their child. It’s crazy to think that instead of trying to find a child the perfect home, agencies are focused more on finding families of the same
Germans refused adoption because of negative biological inheritances. White Americas interested in adoption highlighted the possibility of positive environmental impact which can lead to child improvement (Fehrenbach, Race After Hitler 137). After a lot of discussions and law amendments, it seemed that neither West Germans nor U.S. officials “were eager to claim responsibilities for the children and the social problem they were perceived to embody” (Fehrenbach, Race After Hitler 142). Individual efforts were exerted to adopt colored children. An example is Mabel Grammer who, and her husband, adopted “eleven German children” (Fehrenbach, Race After Hitler 148).
Another variable that determines the race of the adopted child varies by the presence of other children in the household. As a matter a fact, they found that “[w]hen there are biologically related children in the household, the adopted child is significantly more likely to be white, like his or her adopting parents and thus, in most cases, like his or her
Unfortunately, kids of color and even children with health problems and disabilities at the time were “labeled [as] unadoptable” (Patton 40) and less favored among the white middle class, even though they actually cost less to adopt. The interview with Sam Bennett illustrates this dilemma as she reveals that it took longer for her family to
This paper will examine the pro, con and my viewpoint of interracial adoptions. First, the pro viewpoint is the children should be raised by parents of the same ethnicity/race. For example, in the article White Mama, Black Baby, parents and children of mixed race families often struggle to find their place within each other’s lives and communities.
Interracial Adoption & Why Race Should Not Be an Overriding Factor The process of adoption was legalized in the United States in the 1850s, and over the past 150 years since then, the institution has drastically changed with our society(Fogle). One of these changes being the growing concern of interracial adoption. The conversation about whether or not race should be a determining factor in adoption first surfaced in 1972, when the concern for children being placed in a household with adoptive parents of a different race was first introduced at the national conference of the North American Council on Adoptable Children (Liem).
If an adopter did not want a different race child, they would have not accepted the adoption. If the government was just to take the child away, then they should not have given the child to them in the first place. Interracial adoption is a fine way to rescue a lost child and build a loving family.
The experience of many African American Transracial Adoptees with America’s racial complexities parallels the narrative above, an internal struggle to understand racial discrimination, solely due to the skin they inhabit. Transracial adoption, the placement of children in families of differing racial and cultural, began in the 1950s to provide shelter to Asian orphans displaced after World War II; it later expanded to include African Americans and Native Americans (Barn 1273). However, adoption of blacks into Caucasian families encountered sharp criticism in the black community. In 1970, The National Association of Black Social Workers argued that the adoption of African Americans by Caucasians promotes “cultural genocide”, seeking to protect black’s racial and cultural identity (Bradley and Hawkins-Leon 434). Despite thereof, Multiethnic
Tie to the audience: Some of the children that are in foster care might be related to you or the child could be someone that you know like a friend’s child. C. Thesis and Preview: Consequently, we need to do something to make adoption easier and better not only in the United States, but all over the world. Today I will give you a few solutions to fix the foster care system. I’ll begin by telling you about the need to improve foster care. II.
In the 1940s, psychologists Kenneth and Mamie Clark, performed an experiment using four dolls, identical except for color, to test children’s racial perceptions. The majority of the children chose the white doll, because it was prettier. Segregation had a horrible effect on black children’s self-esteem. The children didn’t want to be black, because being black was considered bad. African American’s were not given the opportunity to achieve an adequate education, only the necessities.
Rainbow Kids Adoption and Child Welfare Advocacy says, “Adoption provides these individuals with an opportunity to have a family while staying true to their beliefs” (Ten reasons, 2016). 6. Furthermore, other factors, such as wanting to provide a good life to a child in need, wanting to choose the sex of their child, or wanting to skip the newborn stage can be achieved through adoption (Ten reasons, 2016). [Transition Now that we understand what adoption is and why many choose this method, let’s discuss the actual process.] II.
Thus, it is important to investigate the factors that aid (protective factors) or inhibit (risk factors) transracial adoptees in developing a healthy and positive racial identity so as to ensure the children’s welfare.
Starting in the late 18th century, the process of naturalization and racial equality has plagued America. In 1790 congress decided to extend citizenship only to free whites in the Naturalization Act of 1790. That standard changed after the War when citizenship was also granted to people of African descent but that change did not mean equal treatment or equal rights. Although blacks and minorities were indeed citizens, they were stripped of many basic rights and privileges such as unhindered ability to vote, access to facilities, restaurants and businesses, and housing. Black codes, passed in 1866, restricted African Americans’ economic potential by ensuring that blacks remained a cheap labor force.
They consider themselves as “savers”, helping to the ones of the less privileged racial and ethnic groups in poor countries of the world, and that is why some people see it as an extraordinary positive form of adoption. People saw potential in it and therefore international adoption has grown significantly over the last few decades, with many thousands of children now crossing national borders for adoption each year. In addition, liberalism and racial integration of 1960s opened doors for black children to be adopted by white people (Wu Jung 142). According to the various sources I have read, there are three main causes of the increase in international adoption in Western countries: the dwindling supply of adoptable children in domestic countries, adjustment in adoption laws of Western countries, and the turbulent history of wars that leave as a consequence poor children with no parents.
Young adults’ opinions and values are tremendously influenced by the people that surround them because an estimated, "7 in 10 teens (71%) say their social and political ideology is about the same as their mom and dad 's”(Lyons n.pag.). Although many parents may believe that their children do not listen to a word they say, they do. Parents are the most influential people in their kids’ lives, which means that they have the biggest impact on them. Children watch their every move, they mimic them, and idolize them. This is especially true when it comes to cultural differences.
In fact, many sociologists now see the significance of the changing aspects in the gap of the varying pace of racial and ethnic minorities with diverse demographic, physical, social, professional, family, and religious attributes and pressures added Lewis, Wilson and Robertson. Similarly, studies and researches regarding interracial relationships and interracial children are done all around the world, especially in the U.S.A. Those of Ross, Walker, Todd and Johnsons’ are just few of the many studies that have explored about interracial bonds. Most of these researches focused on sociodemographic factors (Johnsons’ in Walker, 1995), impact with college students (Ross, 2004), as well as perceptions, attitudes and stereotypes (Walker, 1995 & Todd,