Alberta and Saskatchewan Become Canadian Provinces- Causes
There are many ways in which the great causes of the development in the North West district of canada lead to the formation of the eighth and ninth provinces of the dominion of canada, Alberta and Saskatchewan. After they were built, it was decided by experts that Edmonton would become capital of Alberta, and Regina would become capital of saskatchewan(1). It all began when the population of the North West was expanding, many started to believe that they need the needed the same government as other provinces, so the discussion of whether to build one or two provinces commenced(1).
The first cause of the establishment of Alberta and Saskatchewan was that by the end of the 1800s, many new settlers were drawn towards the North West territories due to the variety of resources being found in that region. In the 1880s, there were only about one thousand non-indigenous people living in the North west. By the mid 1890s, the resources brought in many settlers from the United States, Europe and other parts of Canada. In 1901, the population was raised up to seventy-three-thousand(2), but some people in the government argued that the population wasn’t high enough to build provinces(1). The argument was over by 1905 , and by the time the two provinces were built, there was three-hundred-and-seventy-three-thousand
…show more content…
The North also had access to the railway which was a positive factor for their economy since it provided many jobs at that time(2). Leader Frederick Haultain stated that the territory of the North West needs to have the same government responsibilities(1) so that they could collect their own taxes and pay for their own services since they were no longer just a fur trade area(2). The North West was developing into something bigger and
Though one could argue the Métis, an intriguing melting pot of two worlds, did not have a strong political system, they were certainly a unique ethnic and cultural entity. The Métis, historically, were a group of diverse ancestry; they were the result of the Native’s way of life from the old world and the European culture from the new, blended together. For example, not only did they incorporate elements from the French culture such as arranging crops in seigneurial patterns, but they also had an annual bison hunt, which was a tradition passed down from the Natives of British North America. Furthermore, as well as Algonkian, the language spoken by some Native tribes, the Métis inherited the French language. Combining the two, they created a
I believe before the Alberta Settlements model can be adopted at large, there must be long discussions about each of these topics. The Métis leaders would have to figure out what would constitute good governance and how to guide themselves toward the future. Other changes include “crafting a new approach to housing, one which puts the emphasis on individual as opposed to public ownership” and voluntary certification for financial management and related governance functions. The Métis also have to consider the fact that Alberta houses many natural resources and the provincial government is naturally richer.
Newfoundland made the right decision in joining Canada in 1949 because in return they were given the promise of prosperity and security due to family allowance, higher standards of living and relief of debt. When Newfoundland joined Confederation, it was by far the the poorest province. Billions of dollars of equalization payments later and investments into the province by the Federal Government, now means Newfoundland is richer than the average Canadian province and has not qualified for equalization payments since 2008. The first reason why Newfoundland made the right decision in joining Canadian Confederation was because Canada relieved Newfoundland of the financial debt burdening it.
“This is our land! It isn’t a piece of pemmican to be cut off and given in little pieces to us. It is ours and we will take what we want.” (voices and visions chapter 8 pg.181, poundmaker in the english tongue) The Cree and many Métis believed that the land was theirs and they were entitled to it.
During the years between 1854 to 1864, the province of Canada was changing governments frequently, which made it very difficult for them to make important decisions. Many politicians in both Canada West and Canada East thought that the solution would be to create a new country called Canada. Both Canada West and Canada East would have their own governments, but the government in Ottawa would make the really important decisions for the whole country. Leaders in both Canada East and West also believed that it would make the economy stronger if they united. Shortly after Canada East and West united, Nova Scotia joined Canada because a railroad was promised to the new province.
Many years ago, French and British explorers found land that they claimed and fought for, through time they turned this land into Canada. This country began named New France, ruled by the French people, then as British North America, ruled by the British people. The French and the British had frequently fought over power, but this is what ended up shaping the provinces and territories in Canada. Events that impacted Canada were the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713 , then the Treaty of Paris in 1763, the Forming of Upper Canada in 1791, and the Act of the Union in 1849, when a responsible government was formed and Canada became one. The land of Canada began with an unsteady system, and ended with responsible government, having a democracy and giving
Both authors take different standing on their views of regional geography as a whole, as well as the overall view of BC as a province. Both chapters identify the attributes of British Columbia, explain their opinions as to what they feel make up the identity of BC, and what makes it a homeland. Bone and Warkentin take different approaches to the explanation of the province and have different strengths and weaknesses in their approaches.
In 1860, the U.S. was divided. It was divided into the North, South, and New Territories. It was also divided in terms of their views on slavery. The North believed that slavery was wrong, the South completely supported the idea, and the West was indifferent at the time.
The North was an industrial economy that wanted high tariffs to protect and support industry, and wanted direct taxation. In the end they are different sides with different views for the
Transcontinential Railroad had a huge impact on the Native Ameriacans, Society and the Environment. Here is one example of how the Native Americans were impacted: Some of the hardships they faced were very little food, only ate once during their working hours. They worked long hours for very little money, and they had ages 10 and up working. Transcontinential Railroad helped the society grow with the transportation it provided. It replaced wagon trains of previous decades which became usless.
During the pre-civil war time period— also known as the antebellum years— America experienced a widespread transformation for the sake of its economy. With the booming belief of the Manifest Destiny, America’s constant desire for westward expansion caused disputes between the North and the South regarding the establishment of free states and slave states, which led to certain compromises such as the Missouri Compromise. After the Market Revolution, the North and South used its new gained land to create different means of economic gains; the North became industrialized through manufacturing, while the South became an agricultural industry dependent on cotton. However, as America’s boundaries expanded, tensions between the North and South grew, often leading to compromises in bloodshed. The drastic differences between the two groups eventually transformed America into a divided nation of sectionalism economically, politically, and socially.
The South was offended by the North. The North had prominent economy. Northern states based their economy on trade and manufacture goods. Document 3 states, “ the North’s economy came to depend more on trade than on agriculture.” Document 5 also inform how cities in the North grew promptly, the railway system, and the shipping industry.
In the essay, “Federalism, Nationalism, and Reason”, Pierre Trudeau addresses the history and origins of self-determination and nationalism and its central role in federal statehood, he then discusses the interactions of federalism and nationalism in a Canadian context. Trudeau posits major arguments that will be assessed in this review. First, he postures that that the federal state is driven by self-determination and nationalism, which ultimately makes it unstable due to its foundation in emotionalism rather than reason. Second, Trudeau outlines the historical factors that resulted in the separatist narrative in Quebec and claims that Canadian nationalism cannot combat Quebec’s regional nationalism. Trudeau begins the essay with a historical
The railroad shaped Western economic development in many ways, especially by allowing the growth of Western lands. The railroads played a very important part to connect different types of railroad networks together, for example; industrial growth went up because of easy communication by railroad networks. In addition, farming growth rose up, by the expansion Western lands. One of the biggest was transportation, in which gives the consumer the ability to go to different places comfortably. The Transcontinental railroad opened up the Western lands, in which mining and ranching were popular and people took advantage of jobs.
By doing this, colonial Canadians assumed that aboriginal cultural and spiritual beliefs were invalid in relation to European beliefs (244). The problem with ridding the First Nations Peoples of their languages, as Williston points out is to “deprive them of the sense of place that has defined them for thousands of years” (245). The private schooling system was an attack on First Nations identities, and their identity is rooted in “a respect for nature and its processes” (245).