The first layer, the “environment,” their different sons, presents the first difference between their fathering styles. As Daniel (Danny) Saunders was brilliant so Reuven Malter was bright. What implications does the kind of son have on the fathering style? Reb Saunders states it best, “Better I should have no son than to have a brilliant son who had no soul.”(p. 285) In his eyes, the soul separates the bright from the brilliant. As in gardening, with each seed need different methods of tending, so each father according to his child's need may need a different style of parenting. To the brilliant son who grows up in a family where piety and compassion are required one kind of a parenting is required, to the bright son who grows up without …show more content…
David Malter is the exact opposite of Reb Saunders altogether. David is a Zionist while Isaac is a Hasid Jew. This difference of worldview completely encompasses each of their different parenting styles. Zionism is a secular movement that desired to rebuild Israel and now protect the rebuilt country while Hasidim is a religious Jewish sect who still believed in the Messiah. Using the tree analogy, the “tree kind” refers to the vessel in which the sons were parented in. Raised in a home with a Zionist father seems to have conditioned Reuven to have godly values with a secular twist. His father believed “We must make our own Messiah!”(p. 197) Instead of having a personal faith or reverence for God, Reuven and primarily his father drifted into a place of serving two masters and as Jesus put it “Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other.”(Matt. 6:24) While they pursued God on one level, their heart also had other interests such as becoming American. “...and to be counted a loyal American had become increasingly important to us during these last years of the war.”(p. 6 of 297) Certainly, coming from a home that believes in God with a faith like the Hasids creates a desire to be holy like God. However, at best, Danny only developed the heart of a tzaddik In his image, the father molds his son. The ideals that the father has become intertwined with his son's heart. The analogy of a tree fits perfectly with the concept of fathering. The fruit's quality depends on the environment in which the tree is being raised, the quality of the mineral and nutrients that the tree takes in during its lifetime and of course the tree
The first part of this book highlights the fact that both men grew up without a father figure in their lives. Although they were both fatherless both Wes Moore’s had a mother who was very strong and wanted to support her family. The other Wes Moore’s mother was trying
In “The Chosen,” Chaim Potok uses the relationship between Danny and Reuven to show the social and political problems that they dealt with. Reuven didn’t fully understand the Hasidic view on things; he asked his dad, Mr. Malter, many questions, that of which his dad knew most or just gave his opinions. Reuven was drug into Danny’s father, Reb Saunders’s, synagogue multiple times, where he learned more about the Talmud and the history behind the Hasidic religion. Reb Saunders’s was considered a tzaddik, by which everyone looked upon him as a god, but a tzaddik is just a pious leader that is a messenger between God and man. Also, with Reb Saunders being a tzaddik, he will have to pass down the role to his son, Danny.
Father was a man that had many good qualities that helped his family survive. Father learned to cope with the harsh weather conditions. Father was an ingenious man, meaning he knew what to do during most situations. For instance, on page seven Father uses gourds to make kitchen utensils
The ultimate goal of all parents is to see that their children succeed in life. While this may be true, most fathers have additional expectations of their children, as is evident in author Lord Chesterfield’s letter to his son traveling far from home. These expectations are expressed in the rhetorical strategies utilized by Chesterfield. In addition to demonstrating his desires for his son, the rhetorical strategies implemented in the letter reveal the values Chesterfield holds as true. In order to persuade his son that the knowledge he holds is pertinent, Chesterfield first disbands the notion that parents only give advice to exert control over a child, then ties the ability and pride of himself to the success of his son, and finally suggests
Lastly, the two words the son and the man add to the complexity of the relationship. This shows that the man can’t picture himself being a father, especially after knowing he can’t meet the child’s expectation, but will always picture his son being a child in his eyes. In conclusion the author uses literary devices to add depth and emotion to the complex relationship between the two characters. He does this by changing the point of view throughout the poem from son to father. He uses a purposeful structure from present to future coming back to present to demonstrate with the complexity of the father's
East of Eden, by John Steinbeck, reflects the complexities in father/son relationships. The connection between a father and his son is vital to their development. The novel explores the impact of these relations is immense. The central allusion of the novel is comparing several characters to Cain and Abel, who were formed through their attempted relationship with their father-like figure, God. They struggled and vied for the attention, love, and respect of God, which subconsciously influenced their actions and thoughts.
All fathers share similar qualities. They all have a nice, fun side, an imaginative, creative side, a loving, caring side, and so much more. In the short story “Avery’s Gift” and the article “Chicken of the Sea … created by kids” Avery’s father is similar to Ellison’s father because they are both creative and supportive. Both Avery's and Ellison’s father are very creative and have talents.
“I don’t ever want to be trapped the way he’s trapped. I want to be able to breathe, to think what I want to think, to say the things I want to say.” Danny Saunders, a main character from the book The Chosen by Chaim Potok, craved freedom to live his life the way he desired. As the son on Reb Saunders, a Jewish Rabbi, tradition and order dominated Danny’s life. However, Danny never allowed this to stop him.
The son himself follows more of his mother’s personality, because he always thinks ahead. This is evident by the quote “…bothered teachers for homework assignments far ahead of their due dates so I could draw up schedules.” This shows that the son thinks ahead and likes to plan for the future, a characteristic he shares with his mother. The fathers care free, go with the flow personality is exemplified by his multitude of last runs.
Both fathers are quiet men. Both fathers seem to work hard. The difference in the fathers is in the way they express or don 't express their love for their children. In “Wordsmith “the daughter 's father expresses his love through his actions. He repairs his daughter 's old house which proves how much he loves her.
But was he more than just a domineering father who suppressed his son’s pursue of knowledge? As the story progressed, readers can see that under the overt appearance of a
In a study of father-son relationships, Ginsberg claims “The meaning of father in a man’s life profoundly effects how he views himself as a person…” (109). With the image of Jeremiah Land as their father, the Land kids have no choice but to view their selves as loved individuals of worth. Jeremiah’s constant, unconditional love shown equally to each child is second only to God’s love for His
Sometimes the relationship between two generations is very complicated. “My Father Is a Simple Man” by Luis Omar Salinas and “A secret Lost in the Water” by Roch Carrier explore these universal themes, the greatness of love together with the unavoidability of conflicts between two generations through the depiction of the speakers’ personal experience with their fathers. In “My Father Is a Simple Man”, the speaker expresses his love for his father deeply by highly complimenting that his father has sincere “kindness and patience” (Salinas 23) to take the speaker on “lifelong journey” (Salinas 9-10). In the end of the poem, the speaker firmly believes that he should “have learned” (Salinas 36) something from his father which states a manifestly
When Sophie was being thrown out of Waknuk David disagreed why the city choose to do that, david thinks that god would still love Sophie but the real problem is the government and their choices. Both David’s father and the community are not understanding the real reason of religion and are abusing
Lent also uses strong appeals to convey his argument. Dr. Lent also uses pathos to implicate several social complexity to evoke an emotional response to the audience, He uses phrases such as “brain development, social skills, behaviors, and even intelligence,” to reinforce how the quality of overprotective parents have it’s negative effects in their little ones day-to-day life. The author gives a sense of guilt that if parents are still choosing this path, the children will struggle in acquiring skills, acknowledge, and habits that will “leave them unable to deal with stress as adults.” Despite, the criticism the author gives, He also tries to uplift his audience through positive diction using words such as “beneficial,” and “positive” to motivate and inspire his audience how the use of acute stress will enhance a child’s growth in gross motor skills and enabling them to interact well with their surroundings.