The Reign of Terror was an event that happened within the French Revolution. To understand the Reign of Terror, you must understand the events that occurred before it. Before and during the French Revolution, which began in 1789, there were three classes, or estates, which doesn’t include royalty, that existed in France. The First Estate consisted of bishops, priests, monks, etc., which was only about two percent of the population. The Second Estate, which held about one to two percent of the population, included noble men and women. There were two types of nobles, three if you include those called ‘hobereaux’, or ‘old bird.’ Nobles of the robe earned their titles for the completion of public service, but nobles of the sword earned their titles …show more content…
He was nicknamed the Incorruptible for his defense of the Third Estate, attacks on the monarchy, and opposition to slavery. In 1788, Robespierre became Estates General of the French legislature by election. In 1790, he also played a part in how the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen was written. Maximilien Robespierre led the Committee of Public Safety and wrote the Law of Suspects in the September of 1793, which were the things needed to make someone a suspect of belief in the monarchy. If suspected, they would need to be taken into custody to be tried and executed, if found guilty, by the guillotine. In an ironic twist, Maximilien was overthrown and killed by the guillotine in 1794 for the cause of up to 40,000 or more deaths, just for their beliefs in the monarchy. For a clearer picture, the Law of Suspects, published by Maximilien Robespierre in September of 1973, stated that anyone who openly showed their support of the monarchy were to be taken into custody and tried as an enemy of liberty. If their certificate of patriotism was refused, the same fate could occur. This especially included former nobles or servants of the monarchy. With these rules in place, over 40,000 lives were given to the guillotine. Later on, as told earlier in this paper, Maximilien was sent to the guillotine himself, which signaled the end of the Reign of Terror, but not the French
Afraid that they would overthrow the revolution, many royal families, upper class, and lower class men were killed. The Reign of Terror The Reign of Terror was from September 5, 1793 to July 27, 1794 during the French Revolution. The Revolutionary government decided to take harsh measures against people they thought were against the Revolution.
The Reign of Terror was a bad and horrific period that lasted almost a year. It involved the rough and dark reality of crowd justice and murder as the terminal for the victims of the same. By this time, rough justice was the word in the streets of Paris and in other sections of the country. The Jacobins and the sun-culottes joined hands. The violence was unstoppable.
Was the Reign of Terror justified? I think no. Almost 35,000 people were unnecessarily killed by officials. The Reign of Terror was from the beheading of Louis XVI in January 1793 to July 1794. During that time, about 20,000 people were killed by the guillotine.
The Reign of Terror opened the door for the government of France to secure military victories with thus decreased the amount of stress on the government. In Documents B and C, they both illustrate how actions taking by the Committee of Public Safety, the leading Terror body, helped lead to France to victory against foreign enemies. Document B gives us a timeline of the events leading up to the Reign of Terror and we can see how the actions taken by the Committee of Public Safety, such as the Levee en Masse, helped bring about French Victory. We can also see how Document C supports this deduction from Document B as Document C talks about the effect of the revolution and the Reign on the outside threat to France. We can also deduce from Document
The Reign of Terror lasted a year over the span of 1793 to 1794. Throughout this year, many people died because the National Assembly deemed it necessary in order to control the people in which they governed. If one were not following the ideals of the revolution, they were killed. Was the Reign of Terror justified? The Reign of Terror was not justified through the external and internal threats the people faced, the unreasonable methods of terror, and the ideals that the revolution followed.
Government response was one of the reasons why the Reign of Terror was unjust because they treated their own citizens very poorly. On the map, it shows that the Reign of Terror was unjust because the government was forcing people to join the military against their will. “The Vendee region was the hub of the counterrevolution. People here fiercely fought against military draft called the levee en masse and against laws that tried to abolish Christianity in France” (Doc C). The government proved to be very strict and forced people into the military draft called the levee en masse.
This Reign of terror was the result of the French people's paranoia that the enemies of the revolution were going to gain power. The paranoia caused the revolutionaries to sentence anyone who did anything against the resolution to the guillotine, however most
The main goal for the “Reign of Terror” was to get rid of Frances enemies of the war that was happening and protect the country from foreign invaders. There was another name for the “Reign of Terror” it was “The Terror.” This happened during the “French Revolution” between the ninth month of later seventeen hundred and the seventh month of the later seventeenth hundred. The Government decided to make the “Terror” the order of the day on September fifth. This was against those suspected of being enemies or against them.
First, the reign of terror is justified because it brought order and control to the country of france. “National Assembly, believe that the ignorance, neglect, or contempt of the rights of man are the sole causes of public calamities, and the corruption of the government. Therefore, the National Assembly
Birthed from a multitude of causes including the execution of the king, the momentum and arbitrariness of the Revolution, and fear of counter-revolution, Terror itself, became synonymous with the Revolution. Questioning of the Terror thus was equivalent to questioning the Revolution- a crime which carried life sanctions. The Reign of Terror’s pervasive and tyrannic movement infiltrated the nation and claimed over 50,000 lives of conceived counter-revolutionaries, inclusive of Source B’s orator, Antoine Barnavare. Jean Paul-Marat’s emotive speech reinstates the New Order “crush us in the name of justice, they load us with irons in the name of liberty”, perpetuating the development of the Revolution from moral to tyrannical. With the guidance of both Source A and Source B, the first having addressed feudal and monarchical injustices’ committed against the people, and the second- the people's retaliation, to growing extremes, the development of the French Revolution can be traced efficaciously.
After his beheading in January 1793, the radical Maximilien Robespierre took over beginning the period of French Revolution called the Reign of Terror. The Reign of Terror was a 18 month period where the Catholic church, and monarchy were targeted. Over 40,000 countrymen were
The Reign of Terror in France was not justified. This claim can be supported by looking at three areas: external threat, the internal threat, and the methods. The external threat was not enough to justify the Reign of Terror. One example of this is that “churches are soon closed by revolutionary government” which is wrong, because people should be able to choose what they believe in (Document A). Another example is that the “Government denies legal counsel to accused enemies of the revolution” (Document A).
The Reign of Terror In September 1793 to July 1794, the Reign of Terror killed over 40,000 people in France using the guillotine a machine that made it a simple way to execute a mass amount of people. The Reign of Terror was led by no other than , Robespierre. He was trying to form a new government but instead caused thousands of people to be massacred. Ultimately, The Reign of Terror in France was not justified because the threats did not require it, the methods were too extreme and It did not support the ideals of the revolution.
Was The Reign Of Terror Justified? The French Revolution was a very problematic time period. After the execution of Louis XVI, the Reign of Terror began during the years of 1793 - 1794 which was led by French politician, Maximilien Robespierre and lasted for 18 months. This topic is controversial when the question, “Was the Reign of Terror justified?” is asked.
This was a big step forward to fixing the rigid social structure of France and opposing the monarchy’s oppression of peasants. Additionally, Louis was convicted of crimes such as conspiring against liberty. He was later executed on January 21, 1793. (Scandiffio) This shows that the monarchy was seen as very detrimental to the ideal of liberty, the conviction and execution of the king marked the end of the monarchy which was formerly a vital feature of the Old Regime.