In the book A Proper Sense of Honor: Service and Sacrifice in George Washington’s Army by Caroline Cox, the author’s main point is to shed light on and provide examples of the divide between officers and enlisted men in the Continental Army of the American Revolution. The divide was very clear, and was in place in all aspects of their respective lives, the officers being higher on the totem pole, while the enlisted men were decidedly lower. The chapters of this book go into detail about specific aspects that show the division between how officers and enlisted men were treated: punishment, health care, death and burial, and the treatment of prisoners of war. Overall, Cox does a great job of explaining her main theme in depth, and gives readers …show more content…
Hendrix for the University of Carolina Press, Hendrix has some complaints/critiques of the book that I find interesting. At the end of his review, he states that he was disappointed in the way in which the book was included. In the conclusion of A Proper Sense of Honor, Cox talks about how the enlisted veterans (not the officers) of the Civil War were not treated as the war heroes they rightly deserved to be treated as. Most of the veterans just went back to their previous lives of low social and economic status. Hendrix states that a more traditional conclusion, that restates the themes of the book would have been a better choice. “Sadly, its lack leaves the reader with a sense of incompleteness, significantly weakens what would otherwise be a strong work, and rather mutes the effect of the points the author wished to make” (Hendrix). I do not necessarily agree with his statement here. I find it to be boring or unnecessary to end a book by just restating the themes and information that the entire book previously laid out. I thought it was a good way to end the book, since it furthered her theme of the divide in treatment between enlisted men and officers, without explicitly recapping her
The American Revolution marked the history of many heroic events that immaculately stand as true inspirations for the generations to come in the United States. Even today, the gallantry of a few soldiers that won independence for the country is not only kept in the hearts of the people but run in the American blood to demonstrate acts of valor at times of war and hardships. One such story recorded in the history dates back to 1776, about a sixteen-year old juvenile, Joseph Plumb Martin, joined the Rebel Infantry and recorded his tribulations about forty-seven years in a memoir titled as “A Narrative of a Revolutionary Soldier”. The book mainly focuses on the sufferings through the tough situation he went through.
Union Soldier in Battle “Union Soldier in Battle” by Earl Hess, gives an insightful and truly detailed look into the lives of American soldiers during the civil war. This book not only discusses what the battlefield was like but it also goes into depth on how soldiers dealt with coping with what was happening around them. Hess draws his work from letters, diaries, and memoirs of Union soldiers; by doing this, Hess is able to expose the soldier’s deepest fears and also their sources of inner strength. He shows how they were encouraged by belief in God and country, or simply by their sense of duty; how they came to rely on the support of their comrades; and how they learned to muster self-control in order to persevere from one battle to the next.
The American Revolution Alfred F. Young and Lin-Manuel Miranda write stories that fall back to the same time period of the American Revolution. In Young’s book, The Shoemaker and the Tea Party, the story of George Robert Twelves Hewes and his experience and a lower class shoemaker during the Boston Tea Party and The Revolutionary war. Later we see his life 50 years after the Tea Party. In the musical, Hamilton, Miranda tells the story of Hamilton from before the Revolutionary War until his death in 1804.
Did Civil War End Sectionalism in the United States? The Civil War reduced sectionalism and antagonism, by armed conflict. Sectionalism lead to the Civil War. That being said, sectional antagonism ended by the end of the 1900’s. When sectionalism and antagonism ended in the end of the 1900’s the United States became one nation.
Black Hawk later wrote of Davis in his autobiography, saying “We remained here a short time, and then started for Jefferson Barracks, in a steam boat, under the charge of a young war chief, (Lieut. Jefferson Davis) who treated us all with much kindness. He is a good and brave young chief, with whose conduct I was much pleased” (Patterson, 110-12). Davis was good enough to Black Hawk that the chief specifically decided to mention him in the tale of his life. Such an endorsement from the chief of a society based on honor and valor shows how Davis’s intrinsic qualities helped him in his life and on the
Reputation and respect is evident in The Things They Carried and is clearly a side effect of the emphasis put on friendship and weakness within Lieutenant Cross’s group of soldiers. Soldiers dislike weakness and fear being known as weak. In order to maintain their friendships protecting their reputations is a necessity. Although the main theme appears to the reader to be one of love the underlining theory is truly about friendship and the bond the soldiers share between each other.
With all of these soul-shattering, life-changing conditions, it is less of a war and more of a test of strength for the soldiers, here at Valley Forge. Some men were going home and not returning. Other men just completely deserted. Even George Washington’s position was uncertain, the members of congress didn’t trust him. Life at Valley Forge was obviously horrible, and the ugly truth is that it wouldn’t get much better.
“Because My Father Always Said He Was the Only Indian Who Saw Jimi Hendrix Play the ‘Star-Spangled Banner’ at Woodstock”: Individual Warfare As Greek philosopher Plato once said, “Only the dead have seen the end of the war.” In Sherman Alexie’s “Because My Father Always Said He Was the Only Indian Who Saw Jimi Hendrix Play the ‘Star- Spangled Banner’ at Woodstock,” Victor’s father can align directly with this belief.
Men went through so many tasks during the Vietnam War physically and mentally. The beginning chapters focus on training for war and being prepared for the worst. For example, when there is a sergeant in a room with the marines. The sergeant walks to the chalk board and writes “AMBUSHES ARE MURDER AND MURDER IS FUN” (36-37). The
This shows how George Washington treated his men terribly, while King George kept his men well-fed, clothed, and sheltered. If King George was the leader, then he would treat soldiers much better than George Washington would. Also, when George Washington was near the British soldiers during the war, instead of telling himself that his soldiers were too weak, cold, hungry, and tired to fight, he pushes them to the extreme to try and defeat the British soldiers. Although, George Washington’s side did win, he pushed his men too much, resulting in many deaths from starvation, freezing, or even from just being too weak and tired. King George wouldn’t, and didn’t, push his soldiers to fight unless they were strong enough to do
As young men who has been raised in America, “the land of the free and the home of the brave,” the atmosphere filled with violence, murder, and fear brutally snatched the youth right out of these, now soldiers, hands. Chapter three illustrates this brilliantly through the death of Jenkins. After a terrifying, yet overall successful night patrol, the troops make their way back to camp attempting to avoid the,
While the effort of America was important in winning the war, there was a lot of discrimination and prejudice against blacks, Native Americans, women, and homosexuals within the military. The men who fought in the war saw terrible conditions and many had mental breakdowns. This chapter in the book explains the deaths that many soldiers witnessed and how many men became separated from humanity. This caused many soldiers to become insane. The final two chapters in the book talk about changes in the American society throughout the war and the results from the war.
You left your family and friends into a bloody war you could of died but you didn’t mind. You took your life for mine. You made things in life better then if you didn’t go into the war. My papa went into the war and he made it out safe. Those stripes and stars in our flag came from you.
The author compares the soldiers because he wants the readers
His 24-month long mission gave him the opportunity to use his journalism and educational experiences to cover the important roles that African American soldiers were playing in the Vietnam War. The military’s goal in this assignment was to show the American people and potential African American soldiers that African American soldiers were now treated equally. There was a stigma regarding the maltreatment of African Americans in the military, and with the passing of the Civil Rights Bill of 1964, the image of the African American soldier began to quickly change. The new breed of African American soldiers no longer tolerated bigotry and hatred. African American soldiers began uniting to combat the injustices in America as well as within the military overseas.