Compromising to Get Paid to Play For years college football players have been playing basically for free, and only thing in return that they get would be a trophy or a certificate of participation for the season, but it has also has became a widespread debate in the sports world, and these discussion, and debates that have been going on for a while already for NCAA football players, if they should be paid, because their coaches do, and many people do not think they should, and as time has passed more and more people have been discussing this issue, and the NCAA still sides with not paying the athletes, and if this keeps on athletes could quit, leaving the NCAA losing millions of dollars.. However, football players should be paid, and should …show more content…
The time for homework of an athlete is very little time. For example, I am a cross country runner here at College of The Desert, I am up by 5:00 in the morning to leave for practice, I end practice around 7:30, or 8 depending on the workout, I then need to get home and get ready for my next class, and after that my next class, I end up getting home around 9:30pm, and get started on homework, which could take up to a couple of hours, and I go to bed around 2am, and then get some sleep for the next practice, it may not be everyday but it does take a tole on an athlete's body. College football players should be paid for the risks that they put their bodies in, when they are in the game or on the practice field. The college football player, has pads and a helmet, but can be hurt internally. For example, I was in pop warner football when I was younger, and it was the last game of the year before my team and I went to the championship, later that game I was hit illegally by a safety, and a corner, and landed on my collar bone, and snapped it.football pad do not protect inside the body, just the outside, which is why, football players in college should be paid for the risk of their
Getting paid in college would help teach these players some responsibility before they are rewarded a big NFL/NBA contract. Players could make just enough money to be forced to make choices that can pave the way for more responsible decision making when the financial stakes become high. Many players will learn the value of money and the responsibility that comes from holding down a job. College football player’s should get paid to play because these players put themselves at risk for injury, college football is a job, not p.e, and it will help players adjust to college socially and economically. Colleges and the NCAA can make money selling jerseys and other souvenirs that might include the likeness of players, yet the actual players never receive a
Paid to Play One of the biggest controversies in college sports is whether the NCAA (national collegiate athletic association) should be paying college athletes. Hard working athletes, specifically football players, play on television just like the pros do, so why don't they receive a paycheck to play? If they were to be paid would they all be paid the same? There are a numerous amounts of questions that come about with this topic. I feel that the only set back to paying these college athletes is that they are given free schooling.
Many people have multiple perspectives about awards given out in young athletes sports. Some people believe that young athletes should be given awards just for participating in a sport. However, others think that awards should be given to the top athlete on a tea or the one who has improved the most, and experts have reasonable evidence to support both sides of the argument. The question is, which side do you support? Young athletes should get an award just for participating in a sport because it gives them motivation to keep working hard, because they are still young, and most of all, because if everyone gets an award, then no athlete can be favored more than the other.
Should College Football Players be Paid This question is a very controversial question in today's day and age. I personally believe that college players should not get payed. College is a privilege for most athletes and it's not required they stay there. I think that college should be looked up as educational first and sports second.
COLLEGE ATHELETES SHOULD GET PAY FOR PLAYING Over a long time Athletes have push their best to the sport they love, They have work hard for days, weeks, and years gust to show how good they are for universities. Most of these colleges’ players have to deal with a lot of stuff, some of them can barely afford college, other have to deal with injuries and well the worst one is not having a job and putting all your effort in the sport they love. Coaches vs Athletes Why should college coaches get paid so much when the players are winning the games? Nebraska state Senator Ernie Chambers, a longtime supporter of providing stipends to college athletes, who submitted a bill in 2003 that would allow football players at Nebraska to be paid a stipend Quotes, "Sometimes, it just doesn't seem fair.
College Athletes Should Be Paid! Are you aware that despite colleges earning a substantial amount of money from sporting events, student-athletes are not compensated? Many college athletes are not compensated for their hard work. Recently, there have been controversies about whether or not college athletes should be paid. Some people assert that college athletes should not be paid because paying them will alter the atmosphere of the game.
College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.
Should pros be allowed to draft college athletes before they graduate. I believe that the pros shouldn’t be allowed. My reasoning is that players need time to develop & think about what’s best for them. Another reason is that players should graduate first so that if the sport they play doesn’t work out then they have a college degree for a back up career in something else. There are plenty of good reasons but something that players should think more about is the longer you stay in college the more developed & ready for the pro sport you dream of going into.
Should athletes be given a participation award during sport events? As stated in the text, “Pros and Cons: A Look At Participation Trophies For Youth Athletes” students and athletes should not be given participation awards because it teaches them important life lessons, makes them want to try harder, and condemns entitlement in athletes. First, participation awards should not be given out because they can teach kids lessons. When a student or athlete doesn’t receive anything and only one person or one team gets it, it can teach them to keep pushing through the hard times and how to do that. In the text it states, “[I]t teaches us how to deal with and overcome adversity, and that you don’t always get what you want.
So being paid to play is ridiculous because they are already getting a free education. And without the football education would be useless in their future because most do not care about school. this is because the student who plays football will most likely become a professional. Another kind of controversy is that some athletes are put on “exceptional admits” which allows athletes into the University without having
Sports reporter, Kate Murphy, succinctly summarizes an overwhelming standpoint that many people seem to cite in her article "Privilege, not a job: College athletes shouldn 't be paid. " First, she stipulates herself that student-athletes technically fit the criteria of hardworking employees. She also acknowledges that it is nearly impossible for athletes to balance a job while adhering to their strict schedules. However, because student-athletes are "living the dream" and are supposed to drink up the passion and sacrifices of their game, seeking compensation is grotesque and un-sportsman like. This argument rides on the coattails of "purity."
If they really want to earn money they should wait to make it to the professionals. Why should college athletes get paid? If they’re just college students ,not professionals….yet. College athletes should not get paid because they were the ones that signed
Have you ever thought of being a pro athlete? High school and college athletes should not be able to receive payment from NIL deals. This is because of all the pressure it puts on the athletes, the athletes can get taken advantage of by their sponsors, and this could lead to the athlete missing out on opportunities in their lives. There are many pieces of evidence for these reasons that are problems and solutions.
Although college athletes may be on a scholarship that is paying for their education, they also work countless hours on their craft and make millions for their
Colleges are scouting or looking at kids from the age of ten years old. For March Madness (college basketball tournament) a student athlete would miss up to six days of class that they would have to make up later on, due to traveling and having to be with the team. Football player dedicate 43.3 hours of their own life to college sports. Whether it’s going to the weight room, film sessions, or just putting some type of work for the team. It is also more common for athletes who play football or basketball to go pro than in any other college sport.