Do you ever think of why should or shouldn’t the rich people pay more tax than others? Nowadays, people are arguing about the fairness of paying more tax. Statistics have proven that the rich have paid the majority of U.S. income taxes. A person making $100,000 will pay a higher percentage of his income in taxes than a person making $20,000 for instance. According to the Congressional Budget Office, “The 10% of households with the highest incomes pay more than half of all federal taxes. They pay more than 70% of federal income taxes.” On one hand, some experts think rich shouldn’t be taxed more because somehow the money was earned. Rich people worked hard to earn it, and their work should be valued. On the other hand, most people think that rich should pay more tax because they get more from the government. Is it ethical and rational to tax more on rich? Why must the rich pay more tax to help the poor? Although taxing more on rich seems unfair for the rich, it is necessary that rich people should pay more tax and the amount they pay are based on their incomes. First of all, the important reason that can be presented is that the rich people have utilized the public system more. As Elizabeth Warren said, "There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody.” The success of Bill Gates depends not only on his effort, but also …show more content…
In Taiwan, the taxing standard is based on the annual revenue. Every person who gets slavery needs to pay 20% of the income for income tax. A millionaire who earns $10,000,000 a year need to pay $2,000,000 for the income tax while a blue-collar worker who earns $600,000 per year only needs to be taxed $120,000. This taxing standard is equal to both rich and poor people. Therefore, tax on rich more is necessary and it will make the country
This question is answered in Larry Bartels book Unequal Democracy. He proves the conspiracy of how the U.S government favor the rich and wealthy “Unequal Democracy”. Bartel elaborates
Rhetorical Analysis Essay “Richer and Poorer Accounting for Inequality” In the essay “Richer and Poorer Accounting for inequality.” by Jill Lepore published at The New Yorker on March 16 ,2015 she discusses about the economic inequalities we as young Americans are facing today. The author mentions all the statistical studies recorded by reliable sources during different time periods, stories of young lives that have been affected by the economic inequality. The solutions to these type of problems cannot be passed if individuals select Representatives in congress that veto bills, that would benefit the United States.
Although these rich Americans want the government to handle the issue of taxation they feel posing higher taxes on them is just not fair. They feel they are hard working citizens who spend a great deal of time working at their business. It is through risks that they may have taken that got them to the positions that they got to today. They feel frustrated when people call them greedy because of their wealth because they feel the poor are the greedy people. The poor receive handouts from the government for everything in their lives, and the rich have to finance these projects.
Leonhardt believes that taxes can effect on how inequality can be persuade in different directions in the American economy. He even stated, “A true attack on inequality would require that the country move the issue to the center of every political debate: how we tax wealth, how we tax the income of the middle class and poor (often stealthily through the payroll tax)” (547). In short, not only is the middle or lower class Americans are taxed; even the wealthy are taxed but it is a huge argument on how tax should be divide up. However, a high percentage of tax is on the middle and lower class payroll. The wealthy will try and manipulate laws so that they won’t be taxed as much.
One of the arguments used is that we could regulate and tax the 1% income because that would be “fair” but these numbers show how harmful that way of thinking is. 18% of taxes for the “bottom” of the bracket which is around 20% of the U.S population.
So let’s have paid leave, earned sick days. Let’s be sure we have affordable child care and debt-free college. How are we going to do it? We’re going to do it by having the wealthy pay their fare share and close the corporate loopholes.” In this quote, Clinton said that the solution to all the problems of the lower and middle classes is to increase taxes on the wealthy.
The top 10% of America owns up to two thirds of the wealth in America. The article goes on to explain why this idea may be harder to put in effect due to the tax hikes. The middle fifth of America will experience a tax cut by an average of $730 in 2019, but will soon increase in 2027 (“Six More Things to Know,”
Wealth and Inequality in America Inequality The inequality in America has increased over time; the gap between the rich and the poor has become a problem that many Americans don’t see. Inequality is the extent of income which is distributed unequally among the citizenry. The inequality of the United has a large gap between the poor and the rich making it unfair to the population, the rich are becoming wealthier and the poor remain poor. The article “Of the 1%, By the 1%, For the 1%”, authored by Joseph E. Stiglitz describes that there is a 1 percent amount of American’s who are consuming about a quarter of the United States income in a year.
Also, the wealthy is known to be rich, so as they collect more and more taxes, they will spend it on stuff we don't need; instead of paying it on taxes. For
Whereas, a child from the middle class or the poor works hard to pursue the "American dream" because they are driven to better their lives. For example, the wealthy could be taxed at a more extensive rate. But then
However, top 1% does not even get taxed close to middle class. Policies always favored them instead of middle class. Also top CEO’s get extensive amount and there pay has been controversial. In Economic booms, CEO pay skyrocketed. In the 90’s Clinton considered CEO pay to be core issue of his campaign in which he planned to remove corporate tax deductions for executive pay in excess of one million dollar a year.
Also the loopholes in tax laws make it easy for corporations and wealthy individuals to get out of paying their fair share to avoid any tax burden. Goldman Sachs and the Koch brothers are examples that show the wealth inequality gap increasing as they do not pay their rightful amount of
Many people are strongly debating whether or not the rich should pay higher taxes. I believe it should be that the rich do pay higher taxes. When times in the economy are rough, the government needs to look consider at how they could bring in more money. Charging the wealthy higher taxes could be a strategy the government could use., and the wealthy people are the ones who could afford it.
Advantage of flat tax system Before we start to discuss the content in this part, some conceptual issues should be illustrated ahead of the very beginning of this part: What’s the spirit a tax system should convey to the public? What are the functions and goals the government plans to achieve through a tax system? The spirit a tax system should convey to the public. All men are created equally which convey the basic creed that everyone should be equally considered despite the race, color, faith and- which should be specifically focused in this case- income.
The new tax reform bill could negatively affect college universities athletic programs around the world. Coaches at top universities could start to see a decline in their salaries. Sport teams that don’t bring in large revenue could be cut from universities because of funding issues. Athletic programs depend on charitable donations from donors to help pay their coaches, offer scholarships for sports such as fencing, and renovate facilities. The old tax bill allowed for donors to receive an 80% deductible for large donations.