Should College Athletes Be Paid? The biggest dispute going around the college world today would probably be the argument about whether or not student athletes should be paid. There are people who do not think student athletes should be paid, and believe they are given enough money as it is through scholarships that provide money for books, housing, and even meals. A lot of people, including the majority of student athletes, believe they should get paid, or at least compensated as employees of the university. The National Collegiate Athletic Association or NCAA manages athletes by making a certain set of rules the athletes, coaches, and college organizations have to follow. If they break one of these rules, they may face serious punishment, …show more content…
These physical stresses can end up causing a substantial amount of mental stress that eventually effect student athletes academically. While struggling to be the best they can be in the class room and off the field, student athletes make millions of dollars every year for their given universities and create a name for their school which creates more incoming freshman every single year. Student athletes sometimes are labeled as lazy in the academic field, however they are graduating at a higher rate than ever while top football schools are on top of graduating rates across the nation. Student athletes do have a lot more benefits than those of the normal student life, but these benefits are created to the amount of work put into their universities. While doing so much for their schools, student athletes are only allowed a certain amount of money and rights, while not having the security of an employee of the university. Student athletes can be released at any moment during their time at the school due to something as simple as a leg injury that can easily happen while practicing every day. The NCAA has some changes to make and the student athletes need to stand up for their own
Tom Farrey, author of Game On, argues in chapter 6 that the NCAA creates scholarships to benefit themselves more than it does the students who receive them. Notably, the students cannot receive four year education deals; more often, they can only receive partial scholarships that only last for half of their college life, and while there are full rides for some, the full rides only cover college costs and not many of the lively expenditures students face. These scholarships incentivize aspiring players as a way to pay for college, even though this option comes with flaws. The myth of athletic scholarships has spread like an epidemic and parents start their children younger to get these scholarships. I agree with Farrey because of the abuse
The organization was founded to protect student athletes but how did the NCAA go from being an agreement to promote safety standards so as to prevent death on the field, to a multi-million dollar enterprise that seems most concerned with ensuring that "student-athletes" do not receive any compensation for their in-demand talents? 1) For example Heisman trophy winner Johnny Manziel generated $37 million worth of exposure for Texas A&M last season, and in the meantime Manziel didn’t get a single penny from the revenue produced by him. V. Hardships of being a student athlete A. After being recruited to play college sports this is where athletes will hear the terms “continuing eligibility” and “progress toward degree” which means that student-athletes need to stay on track in order to maintain progress toward a baccalaureate or equivalent degree to stay eligible to at the NCAA level. 1)
Our society today is so focused on a money filled world that that is all these young, adult, college, athletes care about; they can not see past the real privileges they are undertaking by being an athlete. When an athlete receives a full-ride scholarship from a college, the college pays for the students tuition, fees, room, board, books, supplies, and
There are many different opinions that have developed on this subject. There are good points argued for both sides of this issue. However, college athletes should
Yet, the term “student athlete” seems to always hold these talks back. There is certainly a strong possibility that athletics within the NCAA and its member institutions will no longer be considered either amateur or educational (Smith), but until then athletes will struggle and do what is necessary to survive. The NCAA may still have the edge in this vigorous debate, but it is only a matter of time until their unfair treatment of student athletes comes to an
Should college athletes get paid? People have been asking this question for many years and people still don’t know the answer to it. That are people who are for paying athletes while there’s also a group that are against, some of the people that are for paying athletes are ex-college players and coaches and the people that are against are mostly people that work for the NCAA. Many people have different points of view on rather the athletes should get paid. There is some sport analysis that thinks that college athletes shouldn’t be paid for many reasons, one reason is the fact that the athletes already receive a free scholarship and they believe that covers for all the money they bring in from competitions.
The athletes play a role in the promotion of the team, but do not benefit from doing so. The NCAA and colleges make profit from the athlete’s ability to perform their sport well and please the
Athletes can't keep up with sports if they are not healthy. College athletes also won't have any time getting a job because of all their training and studying. Athletes have gym too which also cost money.most colleges do not require gyms so they do not have them. Without these things athletes will begin to stop being healthy and break down during practice.
With the stereotype that college athletes get special treatment, the prospect that they can get paid and other students in college do not would seem fair. There are students in these schools that work hard every day. Yet as a college athlete everything is harder on them. College athletes have early morning practices and early morning classes. Then they practice again in the afternoon and have to find time to study and complete their school work while having to find time to workout throughout the week as well.
Just think your a college basketball player working hard and the top of your team it all good on the court but outside of basketball you are struggling to get money. A starting freshmen in college was tacked so hard in football the he was parlized. A college basketball player has most his or her time practicing for basketball. Most college basketball players have to skip classes for basketball. College basketball player should be paid because they put their bodies at risk, they don’t have money, and they skip classes for basketball.
Should college athletes be paid? Should student Athletes be paid to play College Football? Well in this essay I will be doing a Rhetorical Analysis on two different essays based on if college athletes should be paid, to play Football. Some say that the student athletes already get a scholarship for school, housing, books and more.
The NCAA profits unfairly from athletes,“ The NCAA, colleges, and universities profit unfairly from the work and likenesses of college athletes”(Procon.org). It shows that colleges profit unfairly from the players and don't give the players any of the money. It is wrong not to pay college athletes because they have expenses to pay for and they need money to
College athletes are required to keep up with a certain GPA and have to take so many credits each semester to be eligible to play that particular sport. The athletes are being pushed more than a student that isn’t in a sport. Students who aren’t in a sport don’t have to worry as much about making sure their grades are constantly up and staying eligible for something. If the player is not keeping up with that end of the deal than they can suffer the consequences like not being able to play a certain amount of games or even being kicked off the team. These athletes have a lot at stake when they go to
True, but to be a student athlete is a tough ‘job’ to manage with going from the field to the library day in and day out: “Players are essentially working full-time football jobs while going to school; they deserve to be paid more than a scholarship” (Gregory). A scholarship isn’t just enough for these hard-working players who get rewarded with nothing at the end of the day. They often get a scholarship with the package, but that doesn’t cover all the expenses that come with college. Think of a college game that people attend often. Think of the money they’ve spent on the ticket(s), the food, the drinks, and even some souvenirs.
This is because the players are the main aspect of college sports so without them the school would be losing money. “The NCAA, in particular, was an enormously complex and decentralized body and was not under the direct governing authority of presidents. Second, the principle of academic integrity aimed to prevent the widespread exploitation of student-athletes(Hearn)”. The NCAA was formed to fight the problem that could happen which is players going on strike. This could still happen if players feel that they have been mistreated, which is why players should not be allowed to unionize.